Perception & Psychophysics

, Volume 41, Issue 1, pp 29–34 | Cite as

Speed of apparent motion and the wagon-wheel effect

  • David J. Finlay
  • Peter C. Dodwell
Article

Abstract

The speed of apparent movement of a stroboscopically illuminated spoked wheel was measured by counting the number of spokes passing a particular position per unit of time. This measure gave very stable values of speed, which compared closely to predicted speeds calculated from stimulus onset asynchrony and angular displacement values. The results provide, for the first time, a reliable measure of speed of one form of apparent motion. The traditional explanation for the wagon-wheel effect in terms of beta motion is discussed in light of several differences between the classical demonstrations of apparent motion and stroboscopic motion as seen on the wagon wheel.

References

  1. Attneave, F., &Block, G. (1973). Apparent movement in tridimensional space.Perception & Psychophysics,13, 301–307.Google Scholar
  2. Bartley, S. H. (1941).Vision. New York: Van Nostrand.Google Scholar
  3. Caelli, T. M., &Dodwell, P. C. (1980). On the contours of apparent motion: A new perspective on visual space-time.Biological Cybernetics,39, 27–35.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Caelli, T. M., &Finlay, D. (1979). Frequency, phase, and colour coding in apparent motion.Perception,8, 59–68.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Clatworthy, J. L., &Frisby, J. P. (1973). Real and apparent movement. Evidence for a unitary mechanism.Perception,2, 161–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Finlay, D. (1982). Stroboscopic motion in depth.Perception,11, 733–741.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Finlay, D., &Caelli, T. M. (1979). Frequency, phase, and colour coding in apparent motion 2.Perception,8, 595–602.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Finlay, D., Dodwell, P. C., &Caelli, T. M. (1984). The waggon wheel effect.Perception,13, 237–248.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Foster, D. H. (1975). Visual apparent motion and some preferred paths in the rotation group SO(3).Biological Cybernetics,18, 81–89.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Green, M., &Von Grunau, M. (1983). Real and apparent motion One mechanism or two?ACM Siggraph/Sigart Newsletter,17, 17–22.Google Scholar
  11. Kaufman, L., Cyrulnik, I., Kaplowitz, J., Melnick, G., &Stoff, D. (1971). The complementarity of apparent and real motion.Psycholoitsche Forschung,34, 343–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kolers, P. A. (1972).Aspects of motion perception. New York: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  13. Neuhaus, W. (1930). Experimentelle Untersuchungen der Scheln bewegung.Archiv für Gesamte Psychologie,75, 315–458.Google Scholar
  14. Rock, I., &Ebenhoitz, S. (1962). Stroboscopic movement based on change of phenomenal location rather than relative location.American Journal of Psychology,75, 193–207CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Ullman, S. (1979).The interpretation of visual motion. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.Google Scholar
  16. Wertheimer, M. (1961). Experimentelle studien uber das sehen von Bewegung. In T. Shipley (Ed.),Classics in psychology (pp 1032–1089). New York Philosophical Library (Reprinted fromZeitschrift für Psychologie, 1912,61, 161–265).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Psychonomic Society, Inc. 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • David J. Finlay
    • 1
  • Peter C. Dodwell
    • 2
  1. 1.University of NewcastleNewcastleAustralia
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyQueen’s UniversityKingstonCanada

Personalised recommendations