Behavior Research Methods & Instrumentation

, Volume 3, Issue 1, pp 16–18 | Cite as

Content filtering human speech: A simple electronic system

  • Peter L. Rogers
  • Klaus R. Schererf
  • Robert Rosenthal
Instrumentation & Techniques


The use of electronic bandpass filtering for content-masking speech samples in studies on expressive aspects of vocal behavior is discussed. A simple electronic filtering system, which can be built easily and which can be adopted readily for a variety of applications, is described.


Nonverbal Communication Speech Sample Speech Intelligibility Human Speech Vocal Behavior 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. ALPERT, M., KURTZBERG, R. L., & FRIEDHOFF, A. F. Transient voice changes associated with emotional stimuli. General Psychiatry, 1963, 8, 362–365.Google Scholar
  2. COHEN, A. Estimating the degree of schizophrenic pathology from recorded interview samples. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 1961, 17, 403–406.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. DUNCAN, S. Nonverbal communication. Psychological Bulletin, 1969, 72, 118–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. EKMAN, P., & FRIESEN, W. V. Non-verbal behavior in psychotherapy research. In J. Shlien (Ed.),Research in psychotherapy. Vol. 3. Washington, D.C: American Psychological Association, 1968.Google Scholar
  5. FLETCHER, H.Speech and hearing in communication. New York: Van Nostrand. 1953.Google Scholar
  6. KRAMER, E. The judgment of personal characteristics and emotions from non-verbal properties of speech. Psychological Bulletin, 1963, 60, 408–420.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. KRAMER, E. Elimination of verbal cues in judgments of emotion from voice. Journal of Abnormal & Social Psychology, 1964, 68, 390–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. LICKLIDER, J. C. R., & MILLER, G. A. The perception of speech. In S. S. Stevens (Ed.),Handbook of experimental psychology. New York: Wiley, 1951. Pp. 1040–1074.Google Scholar
  9. MAHL, G. F., & SCHULZE, G. Psychological research in the extralinguistic area. In T. A. Sebeok, A. S. Hays, and M. C. Bateson (Eds.),Approaches to semiotics. The Hague: Mouton, 1964. Pp. 51–124.Google Scholar
  10. MILMOE, S. Characteristics of speakers and listeners as factors in nonverbal communication. Unpublished senior honors thesis. Harvard University, Department of Social Relations, 1965.Google Scholar
  11. MILMOE, S., ROSENTHAL, R., BLANE, H., CHAFETZ, M., & WOLF, I. The doctor’s voice: Postdictor of successful referral of alcoholic patients. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 1967, 72, 78–84.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. MILMOE, S., NOVEY, M. S., KAGAN, J., & ROSENTHAL, R. The mother’s voice: Postdictor of aspects of her baby’s behavior. Proceedings, 76th Annual Convention, APA, 1968, 463-464.Google Scholar
  13. SCHERER, K. R. Techniken zur Mikro-A nal y se Kommunikativer Verhaltensweisen. In J. Koolwijk (Ed.),Handbuch der Sozialforschung. Oldenbourg, 1970.Google Scholar
  14. SOSKIN, W., & KAUFFMAN, P. Judgment of emotion in word-free voice samples. Journal of Communication, 1961, 11, 73–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. STARKWEATHER, J. A. Content-free speech as a source of information about the speaker. Journal of Abnormal & Social Psychology, 1956, 52, 394–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. STARKWEATHER, J. A. Vocal behavior as an information channel of speaker status. In K. Salzinger and S. Salzinger (Eds.),Research in verbal behavior and some neurophysiological implications. New York: Academic Press, 1967. Pp. 253–262.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Psychonomic Society, Inc. 1971

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peter L. Rogers
    • 1
  • Klaus R. Schererf
    • 1
  • Robert Rosenthal
    • 1
  1. 1.Harvard UniversityCambridge

Personalised recommendations