The bits and bytes of computer/internet addiction: A factor analytic approach

  • Marc E. Pratarelli
  • Blaine L. Browne
  • Kimberly Johnson
Clinical Applications

Abstract

A factor analytic approach was used to explore possible constructs underlying so-called computer/Internet addiction. A 94-item survey was developed, from which two major and two minor factors were derived. Factor 1 focused on problematic computer-related behaviors in heavy users of the Internet, whereas Factor 2 focused on the usefulness and general purpose nature of computers and the Internet. Factor 3 isolated a combination of use of the Internet for sexual gratification and shyness/introversion, and Factor 4 focused on an absence of problems related to Internet use that were coupled with a mild aversion or a disinterest in this technology. These data support the notion that some individuals have a mixture of obsessive-like characteristics related specifically to their computer/Internet use but that, not surprisingly, they also exhibit a preference for on-line, rather than in-person, interactions.

References

  1. Anderson, R. H., Bikson, T. K., Law, S. A., &Mitchell, B. M. (Eds.) (1995).Universal access to e-mail: Feasibility and societal implications. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation.Google Scholar
  2. Brenner, V. (1997).An initial report on the on-line assessment of internet addiction: The first 30 days of the Internet usage survey [Online]. Available: http://www.ccsnet.com/prep/pap/pap8b/638b012.txtGoogle Scholar
  3. Douse, N. A., &McManus, I. C. (1993). The personality of fantasy.British Journal of Psychology,84, 505–509.Google Scholar
  4. Fearing, J. (1997).Hooked on the Net [On-line]. Available: http://www.nationalcounseling.com/cmpadict.htmlGoogle Scholar
  5. Fizel, D. (1997).Pathological internet use: Psychologists examine who is hooked on the Net and why [On-line American Psychological Association news release]. Available: http://www.apa.org/releases/interadd.htmlGoogle Scholar
  6. Griffiths, M. D. (1995a, April 7). Netties anonymous.Times Higher Educational Supplement, p. 18.Google Scholar
  7. Griffiths, M. D. (1995b). Technological addictions.Clinical Psychology Forum,76, 14–19.Google Scholar
  8. Griffiths, M. D. (1996). Internet “addiction”: An issue for clinical psychology?Clinical Psychology Forum,97, 32–36.Google Scholar
  9. Griffiths, M. D. (1997). Psychology of computer use: XLIII. Some comments on ‘Addictive use of the Internet’ by Young.Psychological Reports,80, 81–82.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Griffiths, M. D. (1998). Internet addiction: Does it really exist? In J. E. Gackenbach (Ed.),Psychology and the Internet: Intrapersonal, interpersonal, and transpersonal implications (pp. 61–75). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  11. Healy, J. M. (1998).Failure to connect: How computers affect our children’s minds, for better and worse. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  12. Henderson, D. (1996, March 1). I’m Kris: I’m a Webaholic: Use of online computer services can be addictive.Seattle Times, pp. A1, A9.Google Scholar
  13. Jacobson, H. B., &Roucek, J. S. (1959).Automation and society. New York: Philosophical Library.Google Scholar
  14. Katz, J. E., &Aspden, P. (1997). A nation of strangers?Communications of the ACM,40, 81–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. King, J. L., &Kraemer, K. L. (1995). Information infrastructure, national policy, and global competitiveness.Information Infrastructure & Policy,4, 5–28.Google Scholar
  16. Kraut, R., Patterson, M., Lundmark, V., Kiesler, S., Mukopadhyay, T., &Scherlis, W. (1998). Internet paradox: A social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological wellbeing?American Psychologist,53, 1017–1031.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. O’Neill, M. (1995, March 8). The lure and addiction of life on line.New York Times, pp. B1, B7.Google Scholar
  18. Orzack, M. H. (1998).Computer addiction services [On-line]. Available: http://www.cse.stanford.edu/classes/cs201/current/Projects/computer-addiction/index.htmlGoogle Scholar
  19. Rheingold, H. (1993).The virtual community: Homesteading on the electronic frontier. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  20. Roberts, L. (1997).Electronic opium: Computer addiction in the Internet age [On-line]. Available: http://www.cse.stanford.edu/classes/cs201/current/Projects/computer-addiction/index.htmlGoogle Scholar
  21. Shotton, M. A. (1989).Computer addiction? London: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  22. Shotton, M. A. (1991). The costs and benefits of computer addiction.Behaviour & Information Technology,10, 219–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Sleek, S. (1998). Isolation increases with Internet use.American Psychological Association Monitor,29, 1, 30.Google Scholar
  24. Sproull, L., &Faraj, S. (1995). Atheism, sex, and databases: The Net as a social technology. In B. Kahin & J. Keller (Eds.),Public access to the Internet (pp. 62–81). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  25. Young, K. S. (1996). Psychology of computer use: XL. Addictive use of the Internet: A case that breaks the stereotype.Psychological Reports,79, 899–902.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Psychonomic Society, Inc. 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marc E. Pratarelli
    • 1
  • Blaine L. Browne
    • 1
  • Kimberly Johnson
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyOklahoma State UniversityStillwater

Personalised recommendations