Perception & Psychophysics

, Volume 36, Issue 6, pp 586–592 | Cite as

Effects of the menstrual cycle on vibrotactile sensitivity

  • George A. Gescheider
  • Ronald T. Verrillo
  • Joseph T. Mccann
  • Eric M. Aldrich


Psychophysical thresholds for the detection of vibration delivered to the thenar eminence of the right hands of young males and females were measured every other day for 30–34 days. The frequency of the vibratory stimulus was either 15 or 250 Hz. The sinusoidal stimuli applied through a 3.0-cm2 contactor were 700 msec in duration and had rise-fall times of 25 msec. Stimulus amplitude was measured with a calibrated accelerometer mounted on the moving element of the vibrator. Data were plotted as a function of successive days in the menstrual cycle. Thresholds for detecting the 15-Hz stimulus did not change significantly, whereas thresholds for detecting the 250-Hz stimulus varied significantly over the menstrual cycle. The 250-Hz threshold became progressively lower as subjects approached the onset of menstruation. After the onset of menstruation, the 250-Hz threshold gradually increased, reaching a maximum value approximately 12 or 13 days later. Soon after the 12th or 13th day of the cycle, the threshold again began to decline and continued to decline until the onset of the next menstrual cycle. The thresholds of women taking birth control pills did not change systematically over the testing period.


  1. Barris, M. C., Dawson, W. W., &Theiss, C. L. (1980). The visual sensitivity of women during the menstrual cycle.Documenta Ophthalmologica,49, 293–301.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Bolanowski, S. J., Jr., &Verrillo, R. T. (1982). Temperature and criterion effects in the somatosensory system: A neurophysiological and psychophysical study.Journal of Neurophysiology,48, 837–856.Google Scholar
  3. Gescheider, G. A. (1976). Evidence in support of the duplex theory of mechanoreception.Sensory Processes,1, 68–76.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Gescheider, G. A. (1985).Psychophysics: Method, theory and application. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  5. Gescheider, G. A., Frisina, R. D., &Verrillo, R. T. (1979). Selective adaptation of vibrotactile thresholds.Sensory processes,3, 37–48.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Gescheider, G. A., O’Malley, M. J., &Verrillo, R.T. (1983). Vibrotactile forward masking: Evidence for channel independence.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,74, 474–485.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Gescheider, G. A., &Verrillo, R. T. (1982). Contralateral enhancement and suppression of vibrotactile sensation.Perception & Psychophysics,32, 69–74.Google Scholar
  8. Gescheider, G. A., Verrillo, R. T, Capraro, A. J., &Hamer, R. D. (1977). Enhancement of vibrotactile sensation magnitude and predictions from the duplex model of mechanoreception.Sensory Processes,1, 187–203.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Gescheider, G. A., Verrillo, R. T., &Van Doren, C. L. (1982). Prediction of vibrotactile masking functions.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,72, 1421–1426.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Goolkasian, P. (1980). Cyclic changes m pain perception: An ROC analysis.Perception & Psychophysics,27, 499–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hamer, R. D., Verrillo, R. T., &Zwislocki, J. J. (1983). Vibrotactile masking of Pacinian and non-Pacinian channels.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,73, 1293–1303.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Henkin, R. I. (1974). Sensory changes during the menstrual cycle. In M. Ferin, F. Halberg, R. M. Richart, & R. L. van de Wiele (Eds.),Biorhythms and human reproduction. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  13. Herren, R. Y. (1933). The effect of high and low female sex hormone concentration on the two-point threshold of pare and touch and upon tactile sensitivity.Journal of Experimental Psychology,16, 324–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kenshalo, D. R. (1966). The cool threshold associated with phases of the menstrual cycle.Journal of Applied Physiology,21, 1031–1039.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Labs, S. M., Gescheider, G. A., Fay, R. R., &Lyons, C. H. (1978) Psychophysical tuning curves in vibrotactionSensory Processes,2, 231–247.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Mair, R. G., Bouffard, J. A., Engen, T.. & Morton, T. H. (1978) Olfactory sensitivity during the menstrual cycle.Sensory Processes,2, 90–98.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Millodot, M., &Lamont, A. (1974). Influence of menstruation on corneal sensitivity.British Journal of Ophthalmology,58, 752–756.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Mountcastle, V. B., Lamotte, R. H., &Carli, G. (1972). Detection thresholds for stimuli in humans and monkeys: Comparison with threshold events in mechanoreceptive afferent nerve fibers innervating the monkey handJournal of Neurophysiology,35, 122–136.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. PARLEY, M. B. (1983). Menstrual rhythms in sensory processes: A review of fluctuations in vision, olfaction, audition, taste, and touch.Psychological Bulletin,93, 539–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Robinson, J. E., &Short, R. V. (1977) Changes in breast sensitivity at puberty, during the menstrual cycle, and at parturition.British Medical Journal,1, 1188–1191.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Scher, D., Plonk, M., &Purcell, D. G. (1981). Visual sensitivity fluctuations during the menstrual cycle under dark and light adaptation.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,18, 159–160.Google Scholar
  22. Talbot, W. H., Darian-Smith, I., Kornhuber, H. H., &Mountcastle, V. B. (1968). The sense of flutter-vibration: Comparison of the human capacity with response patterns of mechanoreceptive afferents from the monkey hand.Journal of Neurophysiology,31, 301–334.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Verrillo, R. T. (1963) Effect of contactor area on the vibrotactide threshold.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,35, 1962–1966.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Verrillo, R. T. (1966a). Vibrotactile sensitivity and the frequencyy response of the Pacinian corpuscle.Psychonomic Science, 1966a,4, 135–136.Google Scholar
  25. Verrillo, R T. (1966B). Vibrotactile thresholds for hairy skin.Journal of Experimental Psychology,72, 47–50.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Verrillo, R. T. (1968). A duplex mechanism of mechanoreception. In D. R. Kenshalo (Ed.),The skin senses. Springfield, IL: Thomas.Google Scholar
  27. Verrillo, R. T. (1979). Comparison of vibrotactile threshold and suprathreshold responses in men and women.Perception & Psychophysics,26, 20–24.Google Scholar
  28. Verrillo, R. T., &Gescheider, G. A. (1975). Enhancement and summation in the perception of two successive vibrotactile stimuli.Perception & Psychophysics,18, 128–136.Google Scholar
  29. Vervillo, R. T., &Gescheider, G. A. (1977). Effects of prior stimulation on vibrotactile thresholds.Sensory Processes,1, 292–300.Google Scholar
  30. Verrillo, R. T, Gescheider, G. A., Calman, B. G., &Van Doren, C. L. (1983) Vibrotactde masking: Effects of one- and two-site stimulation.Perception & Psychophysics,33, 379–387.Google Scholar
  31. Zwislocki, J. J., Maire, F., Feldman, A. S., &Ruben, H. (1958). On the effect of practice and motivation on the threshold of audibilityJournal of the Acoustical Society of America,30, 254–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Psychonomic Society, Inc. 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • George A. Gescheider
    • 1
  • Ronald T. Verrillo
    • 2
  • Joseph T. Mccann
    • 1
  • Eric M. Aldrich
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyHamilton CollegeClinton
  2. 2.Institute for Sensory ResearchSyracuse UniversitySyracuse

Personalised recommendations