Perception & Psychophysics

, Volume 39, Issue 6, pp 427–436 | Cite as

The effect of speed-accuracy tradeoff on sex differences in mental rotation

  • David F. Lohman
Article
  • 749 Downloads

Abstract

This experiment examined the effects of sex differences in the form of speed-accuracy curves on sex differences in rate of mental rotation. Eighty-nine subjects attempted 1,200 rotation problems similar to those used by Shepard and Metzler (1971). Stimulus exposure was varied systematically over a wide range, and response accuracy was determined at each exposure. Speed-accuracy curves were then fit using an exponential function similar to one proposed by Wickelgren (1977). Results showed that apparent differences between males and females in rate of rotation are explained by sex differences in the shape of the speed-accuracy curves, with females reaching asymptote sooner on trials requiring more rotation. Similar effects were obtained in a comparison of subjects high and low in spatial ability.

References

  1. Alderton, D. L., Pellegrino, J.W., &Lydiatt, S. (1984).Effects of extended practice on spatial information processing ability. Unpublished manuscript, University of California, Santa Barbara.Google Scholar
  2. Berg, C., Hertzog, C., &Hunt, E. (1982), Age differences in the speed of mental rotation.Developmental Psychology,18, 95–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Blom, G. (1958).Statistical estimates and transformed Beta variables New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  4. Caplan, P. J., MacPherson, G. M., &Tobin, P. (1985). Do sex-related differences in spatial abilities exist? A multilevel critique with new data.American Psychologist,40, 786–799.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Cooper, L. A. (1976). Individual differences in visual comparison processes.Perception & Psychophysics,19, 433–444.Google Scholar
  6. Egan, J. P. (1958).Recognition memory and the operating characteristic (Tech. Rep. No. AFCRC-TR-57-50). Bloomington: Indiana University, Hearing and Communication Lab.Google Scholar
  7. Ekstrom, R. B., French, J. W., &Harman, H. H. (1976).Manual for the kit of factor-referenced cognitive tests. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.Google Scholar
  8. Furneaux, W. D. (1961). Intellectual abilities and problem-solving behavior. In H. J. Eysenck (Ed.),Handbook of abnormal psychology (pp. 167–192). New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  9. Harris, L. J. (1978). Sex differences in spatial ability Possible environmental, genetic, and neurological factors. In M. Kinsbourne (Ed.),Asymmetrical function of the brain (pp. 405–522) New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Hyde, J. S. (1981). How large are cognitive gender differences? A metaanalysis using ω2 and d.American Psychologist,36, 892–901.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Just, M. A., &Carpenter, P. A. (1976). Eye fixations and cognitive processesCognitive Psychology,8, 141–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kail, R., Carter, P., &Pellegrino, J. W. (1979). The locus of sex differences in spatial ability.Perception & Psychophysics,26, 182–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kail, R., Stevenson, M. R., &Black, K. N. (1984). Absence of a sex difference in algorithms for spatial problem solving.Intelligence,8, 37–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lansman, M. (1981). Ability factors and the speed of information processing. In M. P. Friedman, J. P. Das, & N. O’Connor (Eds),Intelligence and learning (pp. 441–458). New York: Plenum PressGoogle Scholar
  15. Linn, M.C., &Petersen, A. C. (1985). Emergence and characterization of sex differences in spatial ability: A meta-analysis.Child Development,56, 1479–1498.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Lohman, D F (1979).Spatial ability: A review and reanalysis of the correlation literature (Tech. Rep. No. 8). Stanford, CA Stanford Universitv, School of Education, Aptitude Research Project (NTIS No. AD-A075 972)Google Scholar
  17. Maccoby, E. E., Jacklin, C. N. (1974).Psychology of sex differences Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  18. McGee, M. G. (1979).Human spatial abilities. Sources of sex differences. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
  19. McNichol D. (1972).A primer of signal detection theory. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  20. Metzler, J. (1973). Cognitive analogues of the rotation of three-dimensional objects (Doctoral dissertation, Stanford University, 1973).Dissertation Abstracts International,34, 2973B.Google Scholar
  21. Pachella, R. G. (1974) The interpretation of reaction time in information processing research. In B. Kantowitz (Ed),Human information processing: Tutorials in performance and cognition (pp. 41–82) Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  22. Palmer, S. (1977). Hierarchical structure in perceptual representation.Cognitive Psychology,9, 441–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Pellegrino, J. W., &Kail, R. (1982). Process analyses of spatial aptitude. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.),Advances in the psychology of human intelligence (Vol 1, pp. 311–366). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  24. Regian, J. W., &Pellegrino, J. W. (1984).Practice and transfer effects in two-dimensional mental rotation. Unpublished manuscript, University of California, Santa Barbara.Google Scholar
  25. Shepard, R. N., &Cooper, L. A. (1982).Mental images and their transformations. Cambridge, MA MIT Press.Google Scholar
  26. Shepard, R. N., &Metzler, J. (1971). Mental rotation of three-dimensional objects.Science,171, 701–703.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Sherman, J. A. (1978).Sex-related cognitive differences: An essay on theory and evidence. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.Google Scholar
  28. Tapley, S. M., &Bryden, M. P. (1977). An investigation of sex differences in spatial ability: Mental rotation of three-dimensional objects.Canadian Journal of Psychology,31, 122–130.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Thurstone, L. L. (1937). Ability, motivation, and speed.Psychometrika,2, 249–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Thurstone, T. G. (1958)Manual for the primary mental abilities. Chicago, IL SRA.Google Scholar
  31. Wickelgren, W. A. (1977). Speed-accuracy tradeoff and information processing dynamics.Acta Psychologica,41, 67–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Yuille, J., &Steiger, J. (1982) Nonholistic processing in mental rotation: Some suggestive evidence.Perception & Psychophysics,31, 201–209.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Psychonomic Society, Inc. 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • David F. Lohman
    • 1
  1. 1.366 Lindquist CenterThe University of IowaIowa City

Personalised recommendations