Perception & Psychophysics

, Volume 48, Issue 4, pp 326–330 | Cite as

Perceptual integration of tertiary taste mixtures

  • Robert L. Mcbride
  • David C. Finlay


Integration psychophysics was used to explore the taste perception of mixtures of sucrose, fructose, and citric acid. Three levels of each stimulus were varied in a 3 × 3 × 3 factorial design. Subjects rated total intensity, sweetness, and acidity of the 27 mixtures on graphic rating scales. Consistent with earlier work, the perceived total intensity of the tertiary mixtures was found to be dictated by the intensity of the (subjectively) stronger component alone (i.e., either the integrated sweetness or the acidity, whichever was the more intense). In contrast, the sweetness and acidity of the mixture were susceptible to mutual suppression: Sweetness suppressed acidity, acidity suppressed sweetness. There was, however, a difference between sucrose and fructose in their interactions with citric acid, fructose being the more susceptible to suppression. This selectivity of suppression indicates that the two sweetnesses could not have been inextricably integrated. Implications for taste coding are discussed, and the findings are reconciled in terms of two separate coding mechanisms: one for taste intensity, another for taste quality.


Acidity Fructose Citric Acid Less Significant Difference Sucrose Concentration 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. De Graaf, C., &Frijters, J. E. (1988). Assessment of the taste interaction between two qualitatively similar—tasting substances: A comparison between comparison rules.Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance,14, 526–538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Frank, R. A., &Archambo, G. (1986). Intensity and hedonic judgments of taste mixtures: An information integration analysis.Chemical Senses,11, 427–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Frijters, J. E. (1987). Psychophysical models for mixtures of tastants and mixtures of odorantsAnnals of the New York Academy of Sctences.,510, 67–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Jakinovich, W. Jr. (1982). Stimulation of the gerbil’s gustatory receptors by saccharin.Journal of Neuroscience,2, 49–56PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Kroeze, J. H. A. (1982). Mixture suppression in taste. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Umversity of Utrecht.Google Scholar
  6. Kroeze, J. H. A. (1989). Is mixture suppression a peripheral or central event? In D. G. Laing., W. S Cain., R. L McBride., & B. W. Ache (Eds.),Perception of complex smells and tastes (pp. 225–243) Sydney: Acadermc PressGoogle Scholar
  7. Kroeze, J. H. A., &Bartoshuk, L. M. (1985) Bitterness suppression as revealed by split-tongue taste shmulation in humansPhysiology & Behavior,35, 779–783CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Laing, D. G., Cain, W. S., McBride, R. L., &Ache, B. W. (Eds.) (1989).Perception of complex smells and tastes. Sydney Academic Press.Google Scholar
  9. Lawless, H. T. (1979) Evidence for neural inhibmon in bittersweet taste mixtures.Journal of Comparattve & Physiological Psychology.,93, 538–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. McBride, R. L. (1982)Toward a unified theory of psychophysics Unpublished doctoral dissertation., Macquarie University, Sydney.Google Scholar
  11. McBride, R. L. (1986). Sweetness of binary mixtures of sucrose, fructose, and glucose.Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception & Performance,12, 584–591CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. McBride, R. L. (1987). Taste psychophysics and the Beidler equation.Chemical Senses,12, 323–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. McBride, R. L. (1988). Taste reception of binary sugar mixturesPsychophysical comparison of two models. Perception & Psychophysics.,44, 167–171.Google Scholar
  14. McBride, R. L. (1989). Three models for taste mixtures. In D. G. Laing., W. S. Cam., R L. McBride., & B. W. Ache (Ed),Perception of complex smells and tastes (pp. 265–282) Sydney: Academic PressGoogle Scholar
  15. McBride, R. L., & Anderson, N. H. (in press). Integration psychophysics. In R. L. McBride & H. J. H. MacFie (Eds.),Psychological basis of sensory evaluanon London: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  16. McBride, R. L., &Booth, D. A. (1986). Using classical psychophysics to determine ideal flavour intensity.Journal of Food Technology,21., 775–780.Google Scholar
  17. McBride, R. L., &Finlay, D. C. (1989). Perception of taste mixtures by experienced and novice assessors.Journal of Sensory Studies.,3, 237–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. McBride, R. L., &Johnson, R. L. (1987). Perception of sugar-acid mixtures in lemon juice drink.International Journal of Food Science and Technology,22, 399–408Google Scholar
  19. Smith, D. V. (1989) Neural and behavioral mechanisms of taste mixture perception in mammals. In D G. Laing., W. S. Cain., R. L., McBride., & B. W. Ache (Ed),Perception of complex smells and tastes (pp. 149–170). Sydney: Acaderruc PressGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Psychonomic Society, Inc. 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert L. Mcbride
    • 1
  • David C. Finlay
    • 2
  1. 1.Sensory Research CentreCSIRO Division of Food ProcessingSydneyAustralia
  2. 2.University of NewcastleNewcastleAustralia

Personalised recommendations