Perception & Psychophysics

, Volume 44, Issue 3, pp 211–221 | Cite as

Judged displacement in apparent vertical and horizontal motion

  • Timothy L. Hubbard
  • Jamshed J. Bharucha
Article

Abstract

The judged vanishing point of a target traveling along a vertical or horizontal trajectory at uniform velocity was examined. In Experiments 1 and 2, subjects indicated the vanishing point by positioning a cross hair. Judged vanishing point was displaced forward in the direction of motion, and the magnitude of the displacement increased with the apparent velocity of the target. Displacement was greater for horizontal than for vertical motion. In Experiment 3, similar patterns were found using a forced-choice paradigm. Experiments 4 and 5 assessed the role of knowledge of the target’s likely behavior. In Experiment 4, the target bounced within the confines of a square frame. Judged vanishing point was displaced in the anticipated direction, even 9 when the anticipated direction was opposite to the current path of motion. Experiment 5 was a control experiment that ruled out the presence of the frame as the sole cause for displacement. The results suggest that displacement from the true vanishing point is due to a high-level cognitive mechanism capable of utilizing knowledge about probable target location.

References

  1. Beverley, K. I., &Regan, D. (1979). Separable aftereffects of changing-size and motion-in-depth: Different neural mechanisms.Vision Research,11, 833–840.Google Scholar
  2. Bharucha, J. J., & Hubbard, T. L. (1988).Anticipated collision along an oblique path: Effects on judged displacement. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
  3. Finke, R. A., &Freyd, J. J. (1985). Transformations of visual memory induced by implied motions of pattern elements.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,11, 780–794.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Fodor, J. A. (1983).The modularity of mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  5. Foster, D.H., &Gravano, S. (1982). Overshoot of curvature in visual apparent motion.Perception & Psychophysics,31, 411–420.Google Scholar
  6. Freyd, J. J. (1987). Dynamic mental representations.Psychological Review,94, 427–438.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Freyd, J. J., &Finke, R. A. (1984). Representational momentum.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,10, 126–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Freyd, J. J., &Finke, R. A. (1985). A velocity effect for representational momentum.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,23, 443–446.Google Scholar
  9. Freyd, J. J., &Johnson, J. Q. (1987). Probing the time course of representational momentum.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,13, 259–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kelly, M., &Freyd, J. J. (1987). Explorations of representational momentum.Cognitive Psychology,19, 369–401.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Matin, L. (1986). Visual localization and eye movements. In K. R. Boff, L. Kaufman, & J. P. Thomas (Eds.),Handbook of perception and human performance: Vol. I. Sensory processes and perception (pp. 20.1–20.45). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  12. Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1981). The imagery debate: Analogue media versus tacit knowledge.Psychological Review,87, 16–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1984).Compulation and cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  14. Runeson, S. (1974). Constant velocity-Not perceived as such.Psychological Research,37, 3–23.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Runeson, S. (1975). Visual prediction of collision with natural and nonnatural motion functions.Perception & Psychophysics,18, 261–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Shepard, R. N. (1984). Ecological constraints on internal representation: Resonant kinematics of perceiving, imaging, thinking, and dreaming.Psychological Review,91, 417–447.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Skavenski, A. A., &Hansen, R. M. (1978). Role of eye position information in visual space perception. In J. W. Senders, D. F. Fisher, & R. A. Monty (Eds.),Eye movements and the higher cognitive functions (pp. 15–34). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Psychonomic Society, Inc. 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • Timothy L. Hubbard
    • 1
  • Jamshed J. Bharucha
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyDarmouth CollegeHanover

Personalised recommendations