Perception & Psychophysics

, Volume 31, Issue 1, pp 13–25 | Cite as

Transformation processes upon the visual code

  • Francesca Simion
  • Sebastiano Bagnara
  • Sergio Roncato
  • Carlo Umilta


Seven experiments investigated whether orientation-dependent latency functions for the visual code resemble those observed in studies of mental rotations of visual images. The subjects were required to perform “same-different” classifications of two simultaneously presented letters. The dependent variables considered were reaction time IRT and accuracy. Experiments 1, 2, 4, 5, and 6 showed that subjects could correctly classify two different letters on the basis of the visual code without preceding transformations. Experiments 1, 2, and 7 showed orientationdependent effects for “same“ responses. It appeared, however, that orientation functions for the visual cede were clearly different from those previously observed for visual images. In addition, the findings of Experiments 4, 5, and 6 indicated that a frame that jointly rotated with the disoriented letters could eliminate the orientation-dependent effects for “same” responses. Experiment 7 showed that the results of Experiments 4, 5, and 6 must be attributed to the structural characteristics of the frame and not to a directional cue. The results of Experiment 3 seemed to demonstrate that transformations did not occur when the subjects used the phonetic code to classify the letters. Overall, the results of the seven experiments were considered to provide a demonstration of the importance of the distinction between the operations on visual images and those on the visual code.

Reference Note

  1. 1.
    Blount, J.The effect of depth cues and pictorial size on “sameness“ judgments. Paper presented at the Psychonomic Society 20th Annual Meeting, Phoenix, Arizona, November 1979.Google Scholar


  1. Ambler, B. A., &Proctor, J. D. The familiarity effect for single letter pairs.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1976,2, 222–234.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Attneave, F., &Olson, R. K. Discriminability of stimuli varying in physical and retinal orientation.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1967,74, 149–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Attneave, F., &Reid, K. Voluntary control of frame of reference and shape equivalence under head rotation.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1968,78, 153–159.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Besnee, D., &Coltheart, M. Same-different judgments with words and nonwords: The differential effects of relative size.Memory & Cognition, 1975,3, 673–677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Besner, D., &Coltheart, M. Mental size scaling examined.Memory & Cognition, 1976,4, 525–531.Google Scholar
  6. Bundesen, C., &Larsen, A. Visual transformation of size.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1975,1, 214–220.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Chase, W. G. Elementary information processes. In W. K. Estes (Ed.),Handbook of learning and cognitive processes (Vol. 5): Human information processing. Hillsdale, N.J: Erlbaum, 1978.Google Scholar
  8. Cooper, L. A. Mental rotation of random two-dimensional shapes.Cognitive Psychology, 1975,7, 20–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cooper, L. A. Demonstration of a mental analog of an external rotation.Perception & Psychophysics, 1976,19, 296–302.Google Scholar
  10. Cooper, L. A., &Podooarny, P. Mental transformations and visual comparison processes: Effects of complexity and similarity.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1976,2, 503–514.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Cooper, L. A., &Shepard, R. N. Chronometric studies of the rotation of mental images. In W. G. Chase (Ed.),Visual information processing. New York: Academic Press, 1973. (a)Google Scholar
  12. Cooper, L. A., &Shepard, R. N. The time required to prepare for a rotated stimulus.Memory & Cognition, 1973,1, 246–250. (b)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Corrallis, M. C., Nagourney, B. A., Shetzer, L. I., &Stefanatos, G. Mental rotation under head tilt: Factors influencing the location of the subjective reference frame.Perception & Psychophysics, 1978,24, 263–273.Google Scholar
  14. Corballis, M. C., &Roldan, C. E. Detection of symmetry as a function of the angular orientation.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1975,1, 221–230.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Corrallis, M. C., Zbodroff, N. J., &Roldan, C. E. What’s up in mental rotation.Perception & Psychophysics, 1976,19, 525–530.Google Scholar
  16. Corrallls, M. C., Zbodroff, N. J., Shetzer, L. I., &Butler, P. B. Decision about identity and orientation of rotated letters and digits.Memory & Cognition, 1978,6, 98–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Corcoran, D. W., &Besner, D. Application of the Posner technique to the study of size and brightness irrelevancies. In P. M. A. Rabbitt & S. Dornic (Eds.),Attention and performance V. London: Academic Press, 1975.Google Scholar
  18. Egerrt, H., &Blecker, R. Differential effects of familiarity on judgments of sameness and difference.Perception & Psychophysics, 1971,9, 321–326.Google Scholar
  19. Hochberg, J., &Gellman, L. The effect of landmark features on mental rotation times.Memory & Cognition, 1977,5, 23–26.Google Scholar
  20. Koleas, P. A., &Perkins, D. N. Orientation of letters and errors in their recognition.Perception & Psychophysics, 1969,5, 265–269.Google Scholar
  21. Kroll, N. E. A., Kellicut, M. H., Berrian, R. W., &Kreisler, A. F. The effect of irrelevant color change on speed of visual recognition following short retention intervals.Journal of ExperimentalPsychology, 1974,103, 97–106.Google Scholar
  22. Larsen, A., &Bundesen, C. Size scaling in visual pattern recognition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1978,4, 1–20.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Missky, M. A. A framework for representing knowledge. In P. Winston (Ed.),The psychology of computer vision. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1975.Google Scholar
  24. Myers, J. L.Fundamentals of experimental design. Boston: Allyn & Bacon, 1972.Google Scholar
  25. Olson, D. R., &Hildyard, A. On the mental representation of oblique orientation.Canadian Journal of Psychology, 1977,21, 3–13.Google Scholar
  26. Pachella, R. G., &Miller, J. O. Stimulus probability and same-different classification.Perception & Psychophysics, 1976,19, 29–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Posnea, M. I. Abstraction and the process of recognition. In G. Bower (Ed.),Advances in learning. New York: Academic Press, 1969.Google Scholar
  28. Porker, M. I.Chronometric explorations of mind. Hillsdale, N.J: Erlbaum, 1978.Google Scholar
  29. Posner, M. I., &Rogers, M. G. K. Chronometric analysis of abstraction and recognition. In M. K. Estes (Ed.),Handbook of learning and cognitive processes (Vol. 5): Human information processing. Hillsdale, N.J: Erlbaum, 1978.Google Scholar
  30. Rock, I.Orientation and form, New York: Academic Press, 1973.Google Scholar
  31. Santee, J. L., &Egeth, H. E. Selective attention in speeded classification and comparison of multidimensional stimuli.Perception & Psychophysics, 1980,28, 191–204.Google Scholar
  32. Shepard, R. N. Form, formation, and transformation of internal representation. In R. Solso (Ed.),Information processing and cognition: The Loyola Symposium. Hilisdale, N.J: Erlbaum, 1975.Google Scholar
  33. Simion, F., Bagnaita, S., Bisiacchi, P., Roncato, S., &Umiltà, C. Laterality effects, levels of processing, and stimulus properties.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1980,6, 184–195.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Stanovich, K. E., &Pachella, R. G. Encoding stimulusresponse compatibility, and stages of processing.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1977,3, 411–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Theios, J. Reaction time measurements in the study of memory processes: Theory and data. In G. Bower (Ed.),The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 7). New York: Academic Press, 1973.Google Scholar
  36. Taeios, J. The components of response latency in simple human information processing tasks. In P. Rabbitt & S. Dornic (Eds.),Attention and performance V. New York: Academic Press, 1975.Google Scholar
  37. Winv.Rt, B. J.Statistical principles in experimental design. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1971.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Psychonomic Society, Inc. 1982

Authors and Affiliations

  • Francesca Simion
    • 1
  • Sebastiano Bagnara
    • 2
  • Sergio Roncato
    • 3
  • Carlo Umilta
    • 4
  1. 1.Institute of Developmental PsychologyUniversity of PaduaPaduaItaly
  2. 2.Institute of PsychologyNational Research CouncilRomeItaly
  3. 3.Institute of PsychologyUniversity of PaduaPaduaItaly
  4. 4.Institute of Human PhysiologyUniversity of ParmaParmaItaly

Personalised recommendations