Advertisement

Perception & Psychophysics

, Volume 10, Issue 3, pp 129–132 | Cite as

The effect of a peripheral stimulus on accommodation

  • Robert T. Hennessy
  • H. W. Leibowitz
Article

Abstract

Accommodation was measured by the laser scintillation technique while the S viewed a stationary fixation spot through a series of apertures in a screen located at various distances. The magnitude of accommodation was a compromise between the distance of the fixation spot and the screen. Accommodation was affected significantly by the interaction of the distance of the screen with aperture sizes of 1 and 4 deg and distance of the screen with its order of movement from near to far or far to near. The data are interpreted as implying the importance of the peripheral visual field and/or perceptual factors when conflicting cues to distance coexist in the visual field.

Keywords

Aperture Size Fixation Target Optical Instrument Peripheral Visual Field Perceptual Factor 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. BAKER, J. R. Experiments on the function of the eye in light microscopy. Journal of the Royal Microscopical Society, 1966, 85, 231–254.Google Scholar
  2. BALDWIN, W. R., & STOVER, W. B. Observation of laser standing wave patterns to determine refractive status. American Journal of Optometry, 1968, 45, 143–150.Google Scholar
  3. FINCHAM, E. F. The accommodation reflex and its stimulus. British Journal of Ophthalmology, 1951, 35, 381–393.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. GOGEL, W. C. Size cues and the adjacency principle. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1965a, 70, 289–293.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. GOGEL, W. C. Equidistance tendency and its consequence. Psychological Bulletin, 1965b, 64, 153–163.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. HENNESSY, R. T., & LEIBOWITZ, H. W. Subjective measurement of accommodation with laser light. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 1970, 60, 1700–1701.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. HOFSTETTER, H. W. The proximal factor in accommodation and convergence, American Journal of Optometry, 1942, 19, 66–76.Google Scholar
  8. ITTELSON, W. H., & AMES, A. Accommodation, convergence and their relation to apparent distance. Journal of Psychology, 1950, 30, 43–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. KNOLL, H. A. Measuring ammetropia with a gas laser: A preliminary report. American Journal of Optometry, 1966, 43, 415–418.Google Scholar
  10. LANDOLT, E.The refraction and accommodation of the eye. Philadelphia: Lippincott, 1886.Google Scholar
  11. SCHOBER, H. Über die Akkomodationruhelage. Optik, 1954, 11, 282–290.Google Scholar
  12. SCHOBER, H. A. W., DEHLER, H., & KASSEL, R. Accommodation during observations with optical instruments. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 1970, 60, 103–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. STARK, L.Neurological control systems. New Yolk: Plenum Press, 1968.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Psychonomic Journals, Inc. 1971

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert T. Hennessy
    • 1
  • H. W. Leibowitz
    • 1
  1. 1.The Pennsylvania State UniversityUniversity Park

Personalised recommendations