Advertisement

Animal Learning & Behavior

, Volume 18, Issue 1, pp 97–108 | Cite as

Object permanence in four species of psittacine birds: An African Grey parrot (Psittacus erithacus), an Illiger mini macaw (Ara maracana), a parakeet (Melopsittacus undulatus), and a cockatiel (Nymphicus hollandicus)

  • Irene M. Pepperberg
  • Mildred S. Funk
Article

Abstract

Four psittacids—an African Grey parrot, an Illiger macaw, a cockatiel, and a parakeet—were tested on object-permanence tasks that are commonly used to assess levels of understanding in human infants during their first 2 years. These birds showed Stage 6 competence, demonstrating that object permanence is not limited to mammals. The results for these birds were comparable to those of an African Grey parrot that had been trained in interspecies communication prior to object-permanence testing. Our findings thus suggest that although language-like behavior provides a communication channel that facilitates testing, such language training is unlikely to affect the outcome of the tests.

Keywords

Object Permanence Hide Object Invisible Displacement African Grey Parrot Melopsittacus Undulatus 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Balda, R. P. (1980). Recovery of cached seeds by a captiveNucifraga caryocatastes.Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie,52, 331–346.Google Scholar
  2. Bateson, P. (1979). How do sensitive periods arise and what are they for?Animal Behaviour,27, 470–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bjork, E. L., &Cummings, E. M. (1984). Infant search errors: Stage of concept development or stage of memory development.Memory & Cognition,12, 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bossema, I. (1979). Jays and oaks: An eco-ethological study of a symbiosis.Behaviour,70, 1–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bower, T. G. R. (1982).Development in infancy. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar
  6. Braggio, J. T., Hall, A. D., Buchanan, J. P., &Nadler, R. D. (1982). Logical and illogical errors made by apes and children on a cognitive task.Journal of Human Evolution,11, 159–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Burghardt, G. M. (1984). Animal awareness: Current perceptions and historical perspective.American Psychologist,40, 905–919.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chardard-Segurel, C. (1984).Possibilités d’abstraction de diffèrentes qualités sensibles chez le perroquet gris (Psittacus erithacus) en référence à l’enfant humain. Doctoral dissertation, Université de Sorbonne, Paris.Google Scholar
  9. Chevalier-Skolnikoff, S. (1976). The ontogeny of primate intelligence and its implications for communicative potential. In S. Harnad, H. Steklis, & J. Lancaster (Eds.),Origins and evolution of language and speech (pp. 173–211). New York: Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
  10. Chevalier-Skolnikoff, S. (1981). The Clever Hans phenomenon, cuing and ape signing: A Piagetian analysis of methods for instructing animals. In T. A. Sebeok & R. Rosenthal (Eds.),The Clever Hans phenomenon (pp. 60–93). New York: Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
  11. Chevalier-Skolnikoff, S. (1989). Spontaneous tool use and sensori-motor intelligence inCebus compared with other monkeys and apes.Behavioral & Brain Sciences,12, 561–627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chevalier-Skolnikoff, S., &Poirier, F. E. (1977).Primate bio-social development: Biological, social, and ecological determinants. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
  13. Cornell, E. H. (1978). Learning to find things: A reinterpretation of object permanence studies. In L. S. Siegel & C. J. Brainerd (Eds.),Alternatives to Piager: Critical essays on the theory (pp. 1–10). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  14. Doré, F. Y., &Dumas, C. (1987). Psychology of animal cognition: Piagetian studies.Psychological Bulletin,102, 219–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Etienne, A. S. (1973a). Developmental stages and cognitive structures as determinants of what is learned. In R. A. Hinde & J. Stevenson (Eds.),Constraints on learning (pp. 371–395). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  16. Etienne, A. S. (1973b). Searching behavior towards a disappearing prey in the domestic chick as affected by preliminary experience.Animal Behaviour,21, 749–761.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Etienne, A. S. (1976–1977). L’étude comparative de la permanence d’objet chez l’animal.Bulletin de Psychologie,327, 187–197.Google Scholar
  18. Flavell, J. H. (1985).Cognitive development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  19. Fletcher, H. (1965). The delayed response problem. In A. Schrier, H. Harlow, & F. Stollnitz (Eds.),Behavior of nonhuman primates (pp. 129–166). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  20. Forshaw, J. (1969).Australian parrots. Melbourne: Lansdowne Press.Google Scholar
  21. Forshaw, J. (1973).Parrots of the world. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  22. Gollin, E. S. (1985). Ontogeny, phylogeny, and causality. In E. S. Gollin (Ed.),The comparative development of adaptive skills: Evolutionary implications (pp. 1–17). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  23. Hall, A. D., Braggio, J. T., Buchanan, J. P., &Nadler, R. D. (1982). Partitioning the influence of level from rate factors on the performance of children and apes on a cognitive task.Journal of Human Evolution,11, 335–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hall, A. D., Braggio, J. T., Buchanan, J. P., Nadler, R. D., Karan, D., &Sams, J. B. (1980). Multiple classification performance of juvenile chimpanzees, normal children, and retarded children.International Journal of Primazology,1, 345–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hallock, M. B., &Worobey, J. (1984). Cognitive development in chimpanzee infants (Pan troglodytes).Journal of Human Evolution,13, 441–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Harriman, A., &Berger, R. (1986). Olfactory acuity in the common raven (Corvus corns).Physiology & Behavior,36, 257–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Harris, P. L. (1983). Infant cognition. In M. M. Haith & J. J. Campos (Eds.),Handbook of child psychology: Infancy and developmental psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 689–782). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  28. Hediger, H. K. P. (1981). The Clever Hans phenomenon from an animal psychologist’s point of view. In T. A. Sebeok & R. Rosenthal (Eds.),The Clever Hans phenomenon (pp. 1–17). New York: Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
  29. Kamil, A. C., &Balda, R. P. (1985). Cache recovery and spatial memory in Clark’s nutcrackers (Nucifraga columbiana).Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,11, 95–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Koehler, O. (1943). “Zahl”-Versuche an einem Kolkraben und Vergleichsversuche an Menschen.Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie,5, 575–712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Koehler, O. (1950). The ability of birds to “count.”Bulletin of Animal Behaviour,9, 41–45.Google Scholar
  32. Kolar, K. (1972). Der Papageien. InGrzimek’s Tierleben VIII, Munich: Kindler-Verlag; English translation, van Nostrand Reinhold.Google Scholar
  33. Kroodsma, D. E. (1982). Learning and the ontogeny of sound signals in birds. In D. E. Kroodsma & E. H. Miller (Eds.),Acoustic communication in birds (Vol. 2, pp. 1–23). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  34. Kroodsma, D. E., Baker, M. C., Baptista, L. F., &Petrinovich, L. (1984). Vocal “dialects” in Nuttall’s white-crowned sparrows.Current Ornithology,2, 103–133.Google Scholar
  35. LeCompte, G. K., &Gratch, G. (1972). Violation of a rule as a method of diagnosing infants’ levels of object concept.Child Development,43, 385–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lorenz, K. (1970).Studies in animal and human behavior (Vol. 1), Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Macphail, E. (1982).Brain and intelligence in vertebrates. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Macphail, E. (1987). The comparative psychology of intelligence.Behavioral & Brain Sciences,10, 645–695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Parker, S. T., &Gibson, K. R. (1977). Object manipulation, tool use and sensorimotor intelligence as feeding adaptations in Cebus monkeys and great apes.Journal of Human Evolution,6, 623–641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Pepperberg, I. M. (1979, June).Functional word use in an African Grey parrot. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Animal Behavior Society, New Orleans.Google Scholar
  41. Pepperberg, I. M. (1981). Functional vocalizations by an African Grey parrot (Psittacus erithacus).Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie,55, 139–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Pepperberg, I. M. (1983). Cognition in the African Grey parrot: Preliminary evidence for auditory/vocal comprehension of the class concept.Animal Learning & Behavior,11, 179–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Pepperberg, I. M. (1987a). Evidence for conceptual quantitative abilities in the African Grey parrot: Labeling of cardinal sets.Ethology,75, 37–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Pepperberg, I. M. (1987b). Interspecies communication: A tool for assessing conceptual abilities in the African Grey parrot (Psittacus erithacus). In G. Greenberg & E. Tobach (Eds.),Language, cognition, consciousness: Integrative levels (pp. 31–56). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  45. Pepperberg, I. M. (1989). Tool use in birds: An avian monkey wrench?Behavioral & Brain Sciences,12, 604–605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Pepperberg, I. M., &Kozak, F. A. (1986). Object permanence in the African Grey parrot (Psittacus erithacus).Animal Learning & Behavior,14, 322–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Piaget, J. (1953).Origin of intelligence in the child. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  48. Piaget, J. (1954).The construction of reality in the child. New York: Basic Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Piaget, J. (1971).Biology and knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  50. Piaget, J. (1978).Behavior and evolution. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
  51. Piaget, J. (1980).Adaptation and intelligence: Organic selection and phenocopy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  52. Premack, D. (1983). The codes of man and beasts.Behavioral & Brain Sciences,6, 125–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Premack, D. (1984). Upgrading a mind. In T. G. Bever, J. M. Carroll, & G. A. Miller (Eds.),Talking minds (pp. 181–206). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  54. Premack, D. (1986).Gavagai. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  55. Redshaw, M. (1978). Cognitive development in human and gorilla infants.Journal of Human Evolution,7, 133–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Rensch, B. (1956). Increase of learning capability with increase in brain size.American Naturalist,90, 81–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Rozin, P. (1976). The evolution of intelligence and access to the cognitive unconscious. In J. M. Sprague & A. N. Epstein (Eds.),Progress in psychobiology and physiological psychology (Vol. 6, pp. 245–280). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  58. Scarr-Salapatek, S. (1976). An evolutionary perspective on infant intelligence: Species patterns and individual variations. In M. Lewis (Ed.),Origins of intelligence (pp. 165–197). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  59. Sherry, D. F. (1982). Food storage, memory, and marsh tits.Animal Behaviour,30, 631–633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Sherry, D. F. (1984). Food storage by black-capped chickadees: Memory for the location and contents of caches.Animal Behaviour,32, 451–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Shettleworth, S., &Krebs, J. (1982). How marsh tits find their hoards: The roles of site preference and spatial memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,8, 354–375.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Shetrleworth, S., &Krebs, J. (1986). Stored and encountered seeds: A comparison of two spatial memory tasks in marsh tits and chickadees.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,12, 248–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Stettner, L. J., &Matyniak, K. (1968). The brain of birds.Scientific American,218, 64–76.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Thinus-Blanc, C., Poucet, B., &Chapuis, N. (1982). Object permanence in cats: Analysis in locomotor space.Behavioural Processes,7, 81–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Thinus-Blanc, C., &Scardigli, P. (1981). Object permanence in the golden hamster.Perceptual & Motor Skills,53, 1010.Google Scholar
  66. Thomas, R. K., &Walden, E. L. (1985). The assessment of cognitive development in human and nonhuman primates. In E. Watts (Ed.),Nonhuman primate models for human growth and development (pp. 187–215). Atlanta: Alan R. Liss.Google Scholar
  67. Tinklepaugh, O. T. (1928). An experimental study of representative factors in monkeys.Journal of Comparative Psychology,8, 197–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Tinklepaugh, O. T. (1932). Multiple delayed reaction with chimpanzees and monkeys.Journal of Comparative Psychology,13, 207–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Triana, E., &Pasnak, R. (1981). Object permanence in cats and dogs.Animal Learning & Behavior,9, 135–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Uzgiris, I. C., &Hunt, J. McV. (1966).Ordinal scales of infant development, No. 1 — Object permanence [Film]. Champaign, IL: University of Illinois Films.Google Scholar
  71. Uzgiris, I. C., &Hunt, J. McV. (1975).Assessment in infancy: Ordinal scales of psychological development. Champaign-Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  72. Vander Wall, S. B. (1982). An experimental analysis of cache recovery in Clark’s nutcrackers.Animal Behaviour,30, 84–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Vauclair, J. (1982). Sensorimotor intelligence in human and non-human primates.Journal of Human Evolution,11, 257–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Vygotsky, L. (1962).Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Wadsworth, B. J. (1984).Piaget’s theory of cognitive and affective development. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
  76. Wellman, H. M., Cross, D., & Bartsch, K. (1986). Infant search and object permanence: A meta-analysis of the A-not-B error.Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development,51(3, Serial No. 214).Google Scholar
  77. Wood, S., Moriarty, K. M., Gardner, B.T., &Gardner, R. A. (1980). Object permanence in child and chimpanzee.Animal Learning & Behavior,8, 3–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Zentall, T. R., Edwards, C. A., Moore, B. S., &Hogan, D. E. (1981). Identity: The basis for both matching and oddity learning in pigeons.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,7, 70–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Zentall, T. R., &Hogan, D. E. (1974). Abstract concept learning in the pigeon.Journal of Experimental Psychology,102, 393–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Psychonomic Society, Inc. 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • Irene M. Pepperberg
    • 1
  • Mildred S. Funk
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of AnthropologyNorthwestern UniversityEvanston

Personalised recommendations