Perception & Psychophysics

, Volume 28, Issue 5, pp 407–412 | Cite as

Influence of preceding liquid on stop-consonant perception

  • Virginia A. Mann
Article

Abstract

Certain attributes of a syllable-final liquid can influence the perceived place of articulation of a following stop consonant. To demonstrate this perceptual context effect, the CV portions of natural tokens of [al-da], [al-ga], [ar-da], [ar-ga] were excised and replaced with closely matched synthetic stimuli drawn from a [da]-[ga] continuum. The resulting hybrid disyllables were then presented to listeners who labeled both liquids and stops. The natural CV portions had two different effects on perception of the synthetic CVs. First, there was an effect of liquid category: Listeners perceived “g” more often in the context of [al] than in that of [ar]. Second, there was an effect due to tokens of [al] and [ar] having been produced before [da] or [ga]: More “g” percepts occurred when stops followed liquids that had been produced before [g]. A hypothesis that each of these perceptual effects finds a parallel in speech production is supported by spectrograms of the original utterances. Here, it seems, is another instance in which findings in speech perception reflect compensation for coarticulation during speech production.

Reference Note

  1. 1.
    GayT.Cinefluorographic and electromyographic studies of articulatory organization (Status Report on Speech Research, SR-50, 77-92). New Haven, Conn: Haskins Laboratories, 1977.Google Scholar

References

  1. Clark, H. H. The language-as-fixed-effect fallacy: A critique of language siatistics in psychological research.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1973,12, 335–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Kuhn, G. M. Stop consonant place perception with single-formant stimuli: Evidence for the role of the front-cavity resonance.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1977,65, 774–788.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Libkrman, A. M., Delattre, P. C., &Cooper, F. S. The role of selected variables in the perception of the unvoiced stop consonants.American Journal of Psychology, 1952,65, 497–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Mann, V. A., &Repp, B. H. Influence of vocalic context on perception of the [∫]-[s] distinction.Perception & Psychophysics, 1980,28, 213–228.Google Scholar
  5. Mann, V. A.. & Repp. B. H. Influence of preceding fricative on stop consonant perception.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, in press.Google Scholar
  6. Öhman, S. E. G. Coarticulation in VCV utterances: Spectrographic measurements.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1966,39, 151–168.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Repp, B. H., Liberman, A. M., Eccardt, T., &Pesetsky, D. Perceptual integration of acoustic cues for stop, fricative, and affricate manner.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1978,4, 621–637.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Repp, B. H., & Mann, V. A. Perceptual assessment of fricativestop coarticulation.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, in press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Psychonomic Society, Inc. 1980

Authors and Affiliations

  • Virginia A. Mann
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Bryn Mawr CollegeBryn Mawr
  2. 2.Haskins LaboratoriesNew Haven

Personalised recommendations