Perception & Psychophysics

, Volume 28, Issue 1, pp 19–27 | Cite as

Dynamic visual noise and the stereophenomenon: Interocular time delays, depth, and coherent velocities

  • David S. Falk
  • Robert Williams
Article
  • 220 Downloads

Abstract

This study concerns the stereophenomenon obtained with binocular viewing of dynamic visual noise with a neutral density filter over one eye. Such a display offers the opportunity to study quantitatively the way in which perceptions are organized when the stimulus provides virtually no organization. Measurements are reported of interocular delay times, apparent depth, and horizontal streaming velocity. The effects of changes in filter density, viewing distance, and dot rate are discussed within the context of various theoretical models that have been proposed. These models attribute the stereophenomenon to temporal disparity, the Pulfrich effect, and random spatial disparity. None is shown to account fully for all aspects of the phenomenon. Finally, the effects of tracking are explained as a property of dynamic visual noise.

Reference Note

  1. 1.
    Ward, R. M., & Morgan, M. J.Eye tracking without a target in random noise. Unpublished manuscript, University of Cambridge, 1977.Google Scholar

References

  1. Diener, H. C., Wist, E. R., Dichgans, J., &Brandt, Th. The spatial frequency effect on perceived velocity.Vision Research, 1976,16, 169–176.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Julesz, B., &Payne, R. A. Differences between monocular and binocular stroboscopic movement perception.Vision Research, 1968,8, 433–444.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Julesz, B., &Tyler, C. W. Neurontropy, an entropy-like measure of neural correlation, in binocular fusion and rivalry.Biological Cybernetics, 1976,23, 23–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Kase, M., Noda, H., Suzuki, D. A., &Miller, D. C. Target velocity signals of visual tracking in vermal Purkinje cells of the monkey.Science, 1979,205, 717–720.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Kaufman, L.Sight and mind. New York: Oxford University Press, 1974.Google Scholar
  6. Kelly, D. H. Motion and vision. I1. Stabilized spatio-temporal threshold surface.Journal of the Optical Society of America, 1979,69, 1340–1349.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Levick, W. R., Cleland, B. G., &Coombs, J.S. On the apparent orbit of the Pulfrich pendulum.Vision Research, 1972,12, 1381–1388.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. MacDonalo, R. I. Temporal stereopsis and dynamic visual noise.Vision Research, 1977,17, 1127–1128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Mezrich, J. J., &Rose, A. Coherent motion and stereopsis in dynamic visual noise.Vision Research, 1977,17, 903–910.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Morgan, M.J. Pulfrich effect and the filling in of apparent motion.Perception, 1976,5, 187–195.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Morgan, M. J., &Thompson, P. Apparent motion and the Pulfrich effect.Perception, 1975,4, 3–18.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Murphy, B. J., Kowler, E., &Steinman, R. M. Slow oculomotor control in the presence of moving backgrounds.Vision Research, 1975,15, 1263–1268.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Pantle, A. Motion aftereffect magnitude as a measure of the spatio-temporal response properties of direction-sensitive analyzers.Vision Research, 1974,14, 1229–1236.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Rogers, B. J., &Anstis, S. M. Intensity vs. adaptation and the Pulfrich stereophenomenon.Vision Research, 1972,12, 909–928.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ross, J. Stereopsis by binocular delay.Nature, 1974,248, 363–364.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ross, J. The resources of binocular perception.Scientific American, 1976,234, 80–86.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Tyler, C. W. Stereopsis in dynamic visual noise.Nature, 1974,250, 781–782.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Tyler, C. W. Stereomovement from interocular delay in dynamic visual noise: A random spatial disparity hypothesis.American Journal of Optometry and Physiological Optics, 1977,54, 374–386.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Watanabe, A., Mori, T., Nagata, S., &Hiwatashi, K. Spatial sine-wave responses of the human visual system.Vision Research, 1968,8, 1245–1263.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Williams, R. Investigation of temporal integration by video sampling.Perception, 1973,2, 441–490.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Wist, E. R., Brandt, Th., Diener, H.-C., &Dichgans, J. Spatial frequency effect on the Pulfrich stereophenomenon.Vision Research, 1977,17, 391–397.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Psychonomic Society, Inc. 1980

Authors and Affiliations

  • David S. Falk
    • 1
  • Robert Williams
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Physics and AstronomyUniversity of MarylandCollege Park
  2. 2.Brain and Perception LaboratoryBristol UniversityBristolEngland

Personalised recommendations