Memory & Cognition

, Volume 22, Issue 1, pp 85–94 | Cite as

Forgetting of verbatim information in discourse

  • Gregory L. Murphy
  • Amy M. Shapiro


In tree experiments, the causes of forgetting of verbatim information in discourse were investigated. In experiment 1, we tested the view that the surface form of a sentence decays when linguistic elements are integrated into larger discourse structures. Contrary to such a view, the results showed that when text could be integrated, both content and verbatim memory improved. In Experiment 2, we examined the possibility that task instructions could influence the level of memory for exact wording and content. The results showed that although task did influence the amount of verbatim memory, it did not affect memory for content. Experiment 3 was an investigation of the degree to which subjects would spontaneously encode surface information on the basis of the social interactiveness of the sentences. Past research has shown that verbatim memory for insults, jokes, and other personal utterances is quite good. In this experiment, identical sentences were tested in texts that had high versus low interactiveness. Verbatim memory was much higher for the same sentences in the highly interactive context. A pragmatic account of verbatim memory is given to explain how content and instructions influence the encoding of surface form.


  1. Anderson, J R (1474) Verbatim and propositional representation of sentences in immediate and long-term memoryJournal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,13, 149–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson, J R, &Bower, G H (1973)Human associative memory Washington, DC Winston & SonsGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderson, J R, &Paulson, R (1977). Representation and retention of verbatim information.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,16, 439–451CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Anderson, R C, &Pichert, J. W (1978). Recall of previously unrecallable information following a shift m perspectiveJournal of Verbal Learning of Verbal Behavior,17, 1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barlett, F C (1932)Remembering. A study in experimental and social psychology Cambridge. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Birch, S (1993).Focus effects in sentence comprehension. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois.Google Scholar
  7. Bock.J. K, &Brewer, W. F (1974) Reconctructive recall in sentences with alternative surface structuresJournal of Experimental Psychology,103, 837–843CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bower, G H, Black, J B, &Tuxnea, T J (1979) Scripts in memory for textCognitive Psychology,11, 177–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bransford, J D, Barclay, R J, &Franks, J. J (1972). Sentence memory A constructive versus interpretive approachCognitive Psychology,3, 193–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bransford, J D, &Franks, J J (1971) The abstraction of linguistic ideasCognitive Psycholagy,2, 331–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bransford, J D., &Johnson, M K. (1973) Considerations of some problems of comprehension. In W G. Chase (Ed.),Visual information processing (pp. 383–438). New York. Academic PressGoogle Scholar
  12. Clark.H. H. &Sengul, C J. (1979) In search of referents for nouns and pronouns.Memory & Cognition,7, 35–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Craik, F. I M, &Lockhart, R. S. (1972) Levels of processing. A framework for memory research.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,12, 599–607CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Craik, F I M., &Tulving, E (1975) Depth of processing and the retention of words in episodic memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology General,104, 268–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gernsbacher, M A. (1985) Surface information loss in comprehensionCognitive Psychology,17, 324–363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gibbs, R. W, Jr. (1981) Memory for requests to conversationJournal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,20, 630–640CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gibbs, R W, Jr. &Nagaoka, A. (1985) Getting file hang of American slang Studies on understanding and remembering slang metaphorsLanguage & Speech,28, 182–194.Google Scholar
  18. Graesser, A., II, &Mandler, G (1975). Recognition memory for the meaning and surface structure of sentencesJournal of Experimental Psychology Human Learning & Memory,1, 238–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jarvella, R J (1971). Syntactic processing of connecxed speech.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,14, 409–416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jarvella, R J (1979) Immediate memory and discourse processing In G H. Bower (Ed.),The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 13, pp. 379–421). New York Academic PressGoogle Scholar
  21. Johnson-Lard, P. N., &Stevenson, R (1970). Memory for syntax.Nature,227, 472.Google Scholar
  22. Keevan, I M. MacWhinney, B, &Mayhew, D (1977) Pragmaties in memory: A study of natural conversauonJournal of Vernal Learning & Verbal Behavior,16, 549–560CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kintsch, W, &Bates, E. (1977). Recognition memory for statements from a classroom lectureJournal of Experimental Psychology Human Learning & Memory,3, 150–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kolers, P A (1975) Memorial consequences of automized encodingJournal of Experimental Psychology Hunan Learning & Meman,1, 689–701CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Levelt, W. J. M, &Keiter.S (1982) Surface form and memory in question answering.Cognitive Psychology,14, 78–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. MacWhinney, B, Keenan, J. M., &Reinke, P (1982) The rote of arousal in memory for conversationMemory & Cognition,19, 308–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mali, B. C (1985) The role of discourse structure in understanding anaphoraJournal of Memory & Language,24, 271–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mani, K, &Johnson-Laird, P N (1982). The mental representation of spinal descriptionsMemory & Cognition,10, 181–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Morris, C. D, Bransford, J. D. &Franks, J J (1977) Levels of processing versus transfer appropriate processingJournal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,16, 519–533CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Murphy, G. L. (1985a). Processes of understanding anaphora.Journal of Memory & language,24, 290–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Murphy, G L (1985b). Psychological explanations of deep and surface anaphora.Journal of Pragmatics,9, 785–813CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Murphy, G L (1992) Comprehension and memory for personal reference The use of social information in language processing.Discourse Processes,25, 337–356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Noice, H. (1992) Elabortive memory strategies of professional actorsApplied Cognitive Psychology,6, 417–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Owens, J., Bower, G H., &Black, J B (1979). The “soap opera” effect in story recallMemory & Cognition,7, 185–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Peterson, R. G., &McIntvite, C W. (1973) The influence of semantic “relatedness” on linguistic integration and retention AmericanJournal of Psychology,86, 547–706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Pompi, K F, &Lachman, R. (1967) Surrogate processes in the short-term retention of connected discourseJournal of Experimental Psychology,75, 143–150.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Roediger, H L., III, &Blaxton, T. A (1987) Effects of varying modality, surface features, and retention interval on printing in word-fragment completion.Memory & Cognition,15, 374–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sacks, J. S (1967). Recognition memory for syntactic and semantic aspects of connected discourse.Perception & Psychophysies,2, 437–442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Sachs, J S (1974). Memory in reading and listening to discourseMemory & Cognition,2, 95–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sag, I. A. &Hankamer, J (1984) Toward a theory of anaphonc processingLaguistics & Philosophy,7, 325–345CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Psychonomic Society, Inc. 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gregory L. Murphy
    • 1
  • Amy M. Shapiro
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of IllinoisChampaign
  2. 2.University of CaliforniaBerkeley

Personalised recommendations