Perception & Psychophysics

, Volume 36, Issue 2, pp 131–145 | Cite as

Effects of discrimination training on the perception of /r-l/ by Japanese adults learning English

  • Winifred Strange
  • Sibylla Dittmann


Native Japanese speakers learning English have difficulty perceptually differentiating the liquid consonants /r/ and /l/, even after extensive conversational instruction. Using a same-different discrimination task with immediate feedback, eight adult female Japanese were given extensive training on a synthetic “rock”-“lock” stimulus series. Performance improved gradually for all subjects over the 14 to 18 training sessions. Comparisons of pretraining and posttraining categorical perception tests with the training stimuli indicated transfer of training to the more demanding identification and oddity discrimination tasks for seven of the eight subjects. Five of seven subjects also improved in identification and oddity discrimination of an acoustically dissimilar “rake”-“lake” synthetic series. However, transfer did not extend to natural speech words contrasting initial /r/ and /V/, It was concluded that modification of perception of some phonetic contrasts in adulthood is slow and effortful, but that improved laboratory training tasks may be useful in establishing categorical perception of these contrasts.


Speech Perception Categorical Perception Acoustical Society ofAmerica Voice Onset Time Natural Speech 


  1. Abramson, A. S., & Lisker, L. (1967). Discriminability along the voicing continuum: Cross-language tests.Proceedings of the 6th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, 569–573.Google Scholar
  2. Aslin, R. N., &Pisoni, D. B. (1980). Some developmental processes in speech perception. In G. H. Yeni-Komshian, J. F. Kavanagh, & C. A. Ferguson (Eds.),Child phonology: Vol 2. Perception (4th ed.). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  3. Aslin, R. N., Pisoni, D. B., &Jusczyk, P. W. (1983). Auditory development and speech perception in infancy. In P. Müssen (Ed.),Carmichael’s manual of child psychology: Vol. 2. Infancy and the biology of development (4th ed., pp. 573–687; M. M. Haith & J. J. Campos, Vol. 2 Eds.). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  4. Beddor, P. S., &Strange, W. (1982). Cross-language study of the perception of the oral-nasal distinction.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,71, 1551–1561.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Best, C. T., Mackain, K. S., &Strange, W. (1982). A cross-language study of categorical perception for semi-vowel and liquid glide contrasts.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,71, Supplement 1, S76. (Abstract)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Briere, E. (1966). An investigation of phonological interference.Language,44, 786–796.Google Scholar
  7. Caramazza, A., Yeni-Komshian, G. H., Zurif, E. B., &Carbone, E. (1973). The acquisition of a new phonological contrast: The case of stop consonants in French-English bilinguals.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,54, 421–428.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Carney, A. E., Widin, G. P., &Viemeister, N. F. (1977). Noncategorical perception of stop consonants differing in VOT.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,62, 961–970.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Edman, T. R. (1980).Learning of intraphonemic discrimination for several synthetic speech continua. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota.Google Scholar
  10. Fledge, J. E. (in press). The effect of linguistic experience on Arabs’ perception of the English /s/ vs /z/ contrast.Folia Linguistica,18.Google Scholar
  11. Goto, H. (1971). Auditory perception by normal Japanese adults of the sounds “1” and “r”.Neuropsychologia,9, 317–323.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gottfried, T. L. (1984). Effects of consonant context on the perception of French vowels.Journal of Phonetics,12, 91–114.Google Scholar
  13. Keating, P. A., Mikos, M. J., &Ganong, W. F. (1981). A cross-language study of range of voice onset time in the perception of initial stop voicing.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,70, 1261–1271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lisker, L. (1970).On learning a new contrast (Status Report on Speech Research, SR-24, pp. 1–15). New Haven, Conn: Haskins Laboratories.Google Scholar
  15. Mackain, K. S., Best, C. T., &Strange, W. (1981). Categorical perception of English /r/ and /l/ by Japanese bilinguals.Applied Psycholinguistics,2, 369–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Marckwardt, A. H. (1944). An experiment in aural perception.The English Journal,33, 212–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Marckwardt, A. H. (1946). Phonemic structure and aural perception.American Speech,21, 106–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mcclasky, C. L., Pisoni, D. B., &Carrell, T. D. (1983). Transfer of training of a new linguistic contrast in voicing.Perception & Psychophysics,34, 323–330.Google Scholar
  19. Miyawaki, K., Strange, W., Verbrugge, R. R., Liberman, A. M., Jenkins, J. J., &Fujimura, O. (1975). An effect of linguistic experience: The discrimination of /r/ and /l/ by native speakers of Japanese and English.Perception & Psychophysics,18, 331–340.Google Scholar
  20. Mochizuki, M. (1981). The identification of /r/ and /l/ in natural and synthesized speech.Journal of Phonetics,9, 283–303.Google Scholar
  21. Nemser, W. (1971).An experimental study of phonological interference in the English of Hungarians. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Oller, D. K., &Eilers, R. E. (1983). Speech identification in Spanish- and English-learning 2-year-olds.Journal of Speech and Hearing Research,26, 50–53.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Pisoni, D. B. (1971).On the nature of categorical perception of speech sounds. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan.Google Scholar
  24. Pisoni, D. B., Asun, R. N., Perey, A. J., &Hennessy, B. L. (1982). Some effects of laboratory training on identification and discrimination of voicing contrasts in stop consonants.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performances,8, 297–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Price, P. J. (1981).A cross-linguistic study of flaps in Japanese and in American English. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
  26. Samuel, A. G. (1977). The effect of discrimination training on speech perception: Noncategorical perception.Perception & Psychophysics,22, 321–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Sapon, S. M., &Carroll, J. B. (1958). Discrimination perception of speech sounds as a function of native language.General Linguistics,3, 62–72.Google Scholar
  28. Sheldon, A., &Strange, W. (1982). The acquisition of /r/ and /l/ by Japanese learners of English: Evidence that speech production can precede speech perception.Applied Psycholinguistics,3, 243–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Singh, S., &Black, J. W. (1966). Study of twenty-six intervocalic consonants as spoken and recognized by four language groups.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,20, 372–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Soli, S. D. (1983). The role of spectral cues in discrimination of voice onset time differences.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,73, 2150–2165.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Stevens, K. N., Liberman, A. M., Studdert-Kennedy, M., &Öhman, S. E. G. (1969). Cross language study of vowel perception.Language and Speech,12, 1–23.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Strange, W. (1972).The effects of training on the perception of synthetic speech sounds: Voice onset time. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota.Google Scholar
  33. Strange, W., &Broen, P. A. (1980). Perception and production of approximant consonants by three-year-olds: A first study. In G. H. Yeni-Komshian, J. F. Kavanagh, & C. A. Ferguson (Eds.),Child phonology: Vol. 2. Perception (pp. 117–154). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  34. Strange, W., &Broen, P. A. (1981). The relationship between perception and production of /w/, /r/, and /I/ by three-year-old children.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology,31, 81–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Streeter, L. A., &Iandauer, T. K. (1976). Effects of learning English as a second language on the acquisition of a new phonemic contrast.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,59, 448–451.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Trehub, S. E. (1976). The discrimination of foreign speech contrasts by infants and adults.Child Development,47, 466–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Werker, J. F. (1982).The development of cross-language speech perception: The effect of age, experience, and context on perceptual organization. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of British Columbia.Google Scholar
  38. Werker, J. F., Gilbert, J. H. V., Humphrey, K., &Tees, R. C. (1981). Developmental aspects of cross-language speech perception.Child Development,52, 349–355.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Williams, L., (1977). The perception of stop consonant voicing by Spanish-English bilinguals.Perception & Psychophysics,21, 289–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Williams, L. (1979). The modification of speech perception and production in second-language learning.Perception &. Psychophysics,26, 95–104.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Psychonomic Society, Inc. 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • Winifred Strange
    • 1
  • Sibylla Dittmann
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of CommunicologyUniversity of South FloridaTampa
  2. 2.University of MinnesotaMinneapolis

Personalised recommendations