Memory & Cognition

, Volume 10, Issue 6, pp 540–545 | Cite as

Imaging while reading text: A study of individual differences

  • Michel Denis


In a series of four experiments, reading time of texts and memory for their informational content were studied in relation to readers’ imagery abilities. The main prediction was that if high imagers (HIs) tend to elaborate images expressing the semantic content of the text while reading, then they should require more time to read imageable material than low imagers (LIs). And in fact, when subjects read a descriptive/narrative text, HIs not only read more slowly, but remembered the text better than LIs. In contrast, when subjects read abstract, nonimageable material, there was no difference between the two groups in reading times or memory. Additional experiments provided further support for the claim that HIs spent more time elaborating images while they read descriptive/narrative text.

Reference Note

  1. 1.
    Simpson, H. M., & Bergin, J. C.Imagery latency and duration. Paper presented at the meetings of the Canadian Psychological Association, St. John’s, Newfoundland, June 1971.Google Scholar


  1. Anderson, J. R., &Bower, G. H.Human associative memory. Washington, D.C: Winston, 1973.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, R. C., &Kulhavy, R.W. Imagery and prose learning.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1972,63, 242–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chaguiboff, J., &Denis, M. Activité d’imagerie et reconnaissance de noms provenant d’un texte narratif.L’Année Psychologique, 1981,81, 69–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Denis, M.Les images mentales. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1979.Google Scholar
  5. Denis, M. Les aspects temporels de l’activité d’imagerie.Psychologie Française, 1982,27, 134–145.Google Scholar
  6. Ernest, C. H. Imagery ability and cognition: A critical review.Journal of Mental Imagery, 1977,1, 181–216.Google Scholar
  7. Ernest, C. H., &Paivio, A. Imagery and verbal associative latencies as a function of imagery ability.Canadian Journal of Psychology, 1971,25, 83–90.Google Scholar
  8. Guillaume, P.Manuel de psychologie. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1963.Google Scholar
  9. Kulhavy, R. W., &Swenson, I. Imagery instructions and the comprehension of text.British Journal of Educational Psychology, 1975,45, 47–51.Google Scholar
  10. Lesgold, A. M., McCormick, C., &Golinkoff, R. M. Imagery training and children’s prose learning.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1975,67, 663–667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Levin, J. R., &Divine-Hawkins, P. Visual imagery as a prose-learning process.Journal of Reading Behavior, 1974,6, 23–30.Google Scholar
  12. Marks, D. F. Visual imagery differences in the recall of pictures.British Journal of Psychology, 1973,64, 17–24.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Mowrer, O. H. Mental imagery: An indispensable psychological concept.Journal of Mental Imagery, 1977,1, 303–325.Google Scholar
  14. Paivio, A.Imagery and verbal processes. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston, 1971.Google Scholar
  15. Pressley, G. M. Mental imagery helps eight-year-olds remember what they read.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1976,68, 355–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Pylyshyn, Z. W. What the mind’s eye tells the mind’s brain: A critique of mental imagery.Psychological Bulletin, 1973,80, 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Rehm, L. P. Relationships among measures of visual imagery.Behavior Research and Therapy, 1973,11, 265–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Steig, W.Falmer Palmer’s wagon ride. New York: Farrar, Straus, & Giroux, 1974.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Psychonomic Society, Inc. 1982

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michel Denis
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratoire de Psychologie , E.R.A. au C.N.R.S. No. 235Université de Paris VIIISaint-Denis Cedcx 2France

Personalised recommendations