Advertisement

Memory & Cognition

, Volume 27, Issue 6, pp 956–961 | Cite as

Priming in a free association task as a function of association directionality

  • René Zeelenberg
  • Richard M. Shiffrin
  • Jeroen G. W. Raaijmakers
Article

Abstract

Two experiments investigated priming in free association, a conceptual implicit memory task. The stimuli consisted of bidirectionally associated word pairs (e.g.,beach-sand) and unidirectionally associated word pairs that have no association from the target response back to the stimulus cue (e.g.,bone-dog). In the study phase, target words (e.g.,sand, dog) were presented in an incidental learning task. In the test phase, participants generated an associate to the stimulus cues (e.g.,beach, bone). In both experiments, priming was obtained for targets (e.g.,sand) that had an association back to the cue, butnot for targets (e.g.,dog) for which such a backward association was absent. These results are problematic for theoretical accounts that attribute priming in free association to the strengthening oftarget responses. It is argued that priming in free association depends on the strengthening of cuetargetassociations.

Keywords

Target Word Journal ofExperimental Psychology Study Phase Implicit Memory Free Association 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anderson, J. R. (1983). A spreading activation theory of memory.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,22, 261–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Basden, B. H., Basden, D. R., &Gargano, G. J. (1993). Directed forgetting in implicit and explicit memory tasks: A comparison of methods.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,19, 603–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Blaxton, T. A. (1989). Investigating dissociations among memory measures: Support for a transfer appropriate processing framework. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,15, 657–668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Burnage, G. (1990).CELEX: A guide for users. Nijmegen: SSN.Google Scholar
  5. Cabeza, R. (1994). A dissociation between two implicit conceptual tests supports the distinction between types of conceptual processing.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,1, 505–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. De Groot, A. M. B. (1980).Mondelinge Woordassociationormen: 100 woordassociaties op 460 Nederlandse zelfstandige naamwoorden [Oral word association norms: 100 word associations to 460 Dutch nouns]. Lisse, The Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger.Google Scholar
  7. Diamond, R., &Rozin, P. (1984). Activation of existing memories in anterograde amnesia.Journal of Abnormal Psychology,93, 98–105.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Graf, P., &Mandler, G. (1984). Activation makes words more accessible, but not necessarily more retrievable.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,23, 553–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Graf, P., Shimamura, A. P., &Squire, L. R. (1985). Priming across modalities and priming across category levels: Extending the domain of preserved function in amnesia.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,11, 386–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Graf, P., Squire, L. R., &Mandler, G. (1984). The information that amnesic patients do not forget.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,10, 164–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Humphreys, M. S., Bain, J. D., &Pike, R. (1989). Different ways to cue a coherent memory system: A theory for episodic, semantic and procedural tasks.Psychological Review,96, 208–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Jacoby, L. L., &Dallas, M. (1981). On the relationship between autobiographicalPsychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,13, 306–340.Google Scholar
  13. Kučera, H., &Francis, W. N. (1967).Computational analysis of present-day American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Lauteslager, M., Schaap, T., &Schievels, D. (1986).Schriftelijke woordassociatienormen voor 549 Nederlandse zelfstandige naamwoorden [Written word association norms for 549 Dutch nouns]. Lisse, The Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger.Google Scholar
  15. McNamara, T. P. (1992). Theories of priming: I. Associative distance and lag.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,18, 1173–1190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Morton, J. (1969). Interaction of information in word recognition.Psychological Review,76, 163–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Nelson, D. L., McEvoy, C. L., & Schreiber, T. A. (1994).The University of South Florida word association, rhyme and word fragment norms. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
  18. Rappold, V. A., &Hashtroudi, S. (1991). Does organization improve priming?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,17, 103–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Roediger, H. L., III (1990). Implicit memory: Retention without remembering.American Psychologist,45, 1043–1056.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Roediger, H. L., III, &McDermott, K. B. (1993). implicit memory in normal human subjects. In F. Boller & J. Grafman (Eds.),Handbook of neuropsychology (Vol. 8, pp. 63–131). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  21. Roediger, H. L., III,Weldon, M. S., Stadler, M. L., &Riegler, G. L. (1992). Direct comparison of two implicit memory tests: Word fragment and word stem completion.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,18, 1251–1269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Salasoo, A., Shiffrin, R. M., &Feustel, T. C. (1985). Building permanent memory codes: Codification and repetition effects in word identification.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,114, 50–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Shimamura, A. P., &Squire, L. R. (1984). Paired-associate learning and priming in amnesia: A neuropsychological study.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,113, 556–570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Storms, L. H. (1958). Apparent backward associations: A situational effect.Journal of Experimental Psychology,55, 390–395.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Vaidya, C. J., Gabrieli, J. D. E., Keane, M. M., &Monti, L. A. (1995). Perceptual and conceptual memory processes in global amnesia.Neuropsychology,9, 580–591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Vaidya, C. J., Gabrieli, J. D. E., Keane, M. M., Monti, L. A., Gutiérrez-Rivas, H., Zarella, M. M. (1997). Evidence for multiple mechanisms of conceptual priming on implicit memory tests.Journal of experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition,23, 1324–1343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. van Loon-Vervoorn, W. A., &Van Bekkum, I. J. (1991).Woordassociatie lexicon [Word association lexicon]. Lisse, The Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger.Google Scholar
  28. Weldon, M. S., &Coyote, K. C. (1996). Failure to find the word picture superiority effect in implicit conceptual memory tests.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,22, 670–686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Psychonomic Society, Inc. 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • René Zeelenberg
    • 1
  • Richard M. Shiffrin
    • 2
  • Jeroen G. W. Raaijmakers
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychonomicsUniversity of AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Indiana UniversityBloomington

Personalised recommendations