Memory & Cognition

, Volume 29, Issue 5, pp 745–756 | Cite as

A dissociation between object manipulation spatial ability and spatial orientation ability



We developed psychometric tests of spatial orientation ability, in which people are shown a two dimensional array of objects, imagine taking a perspective within the array, and indicate the direction to a target object from this perspective. Patterns of errors on these tests were consistent with experimental studies of perspective taking. Characteristic errors and verbal protocols supported the validity of the perspective-taking tests, suggesting that people encoded the objects in the display with respect to a body-centered coordinate system when the imagined perspective was more than 90° different from the orientation of the display. By comparing alternative models in a confirmatory factor analysis, we found that the ability to mentally rotate and manipulate an imagined object (as measured by tests of spatial visualization and spatial relations) and the ability to reorient the imagined self (as measured by the perspective-taking tests) are separable spatial abilities.


  1. Barratt, E. S. (1953). An analysis of verbal reports of solving spatial problems as an aid in defining spatial factors.Journal of Psychology,36, 17–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Borich, G. D., &Bauman, P.M. (1972). Convergent and discriminant validation of the French and Guilford-Zimmerman spatial orientation and spatial visualization factors.Educational & Psychological Measurement,32, 1029–1033.Google Scholar
  3. Bryant, D., &Tversky, B. (1999). Mental representations of perspective and spatial relations from diagrams and models.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,25, 137–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bryant, K. (1982). Personality correlates of sense of direction and geographical orientation.Journal of Personality & Social Psychology,43, 1318–1324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Carpenter, P.A., &Just, M.A. (1986). Spatial ability: An informationprocessing approach to psychometrics. In R. J. Stenberg (Ed.),Advances in the psychology of human intelligence (Vol. 3, pp. 221–252). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  6. Carroll, J. (1993).Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factoranalytical studies. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Easton, R. D., &Sholl, M. J. (1995). Object-array structure, frames of reference, and retrieval of spatial knowledge.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,21, 483–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ekstrom, R. B., French, J.W., &Harman, H. H. (1976).Manual for Kit of Factor Referenced Cognitive Tests. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.Google Scholar
  9. Eliot, J., &Smith, I. M. (1983).An international directory of spatial tests. Windsor Berkshire, U.K.: NFER-Nelson.Google Scholar
  10. Guilford, J. P., &Zimmerman, W. S. (1948). The Guilford-Zimmerman Aptitude Survey.Journal of Applied Psychology,32, 24–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hegarty, M., Richardson, A. E., Montello, D.R., Lovelace, K., &Subbiah, I. (2001).The Santa Barbara Sense of Direction Scale. Unpublished manuscript, University of California, Santa Barbara.Google Scholar
  12. Hintzman, D. L., O’Dell, C. S., &Arndt, D. R. (1981). Orientation in cognitive maps.Cognitive Psychology,13, 149–206.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Huttenlocher, J., &Presson, C. C. (1973). Mental rotation and the perspective problem.Cognitive Psychology,4, 277–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Huttenlocher, J., &Presson, C. C. (1979). The coding and transformation of spatial information.Cognitive Psychology,11, 375–394.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Kline, R. B. (1998).Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  16. Lohman, D. F. (1988). Spatial abilities as traits, processes, and knowledge. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.),Advances in the psychology of human intelligence (pp. 181–248). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  17. McGee, M. G. (1979). Human spatial abilities: Psychometric studies and environmental, genetic, hormonal, and neurological influences.Psychological Bulletin,86, 889–918.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Muller, R. U., Kubie, J. L., Bostock, E. M., Taube, J. S., &Quirk, G. J. (1991). Spatial firing correlates of neurons in the hippocampus formation of freely moving rats. In J. Paillard (Ed.),Brain and space (pp. 269–333). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  19. O’Keefe, J., &Nadel, L. (1978).The hippocampus as a cognitive map. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Paillard, J. (1991).Brain and space. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Presson, C. C. (1982). Strategies in spatial reasoning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,8, 243–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Price, L., &Eliot, J. (1975). Convergent and discriminant validities of two sets of measures of spatial orientation and visualization.Educational & Psychological Measurement,35, 975–977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Rieser, J. J. (1989). Access to knowledge of spatial structure at novel points of observation.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,15, 1157–1165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Shelton, A. L., &McNamara, T. P. (1997). Multiple views of spatial memory.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,4, 102–106.Google Scholar
  25. Sholl, M. J. (1988). The relation between sense of direction and mental geographic updating.Intelligence,12, 299–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Simons, D. J., &Wang, R. F. (1998). Perceiving real-world viewpoint changes.Psychological Science,9, 315–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Wraga, M., Creem, S.H., &Profitt, D. R. (2000). Updating displays after imagined object and viewer rotations.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,26, 151–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Zacks, J., Rypma, B., Gabrieli, J.D. E., Tversky, B., &Glover, G.H. (1999). Imagined transformations of bodies: An fMRI investigation.Neuropsychologia,37, 1029–1040.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Psychonomic Society, Inc. 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of CaliforniaSanta Barbara
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyRutgers UniversityNewark

Personalised recommendations