Perception & Psychophysics

, Volume 26, Issue 1, pp 53–68

On utrocular discrimination

  • Randolph Blake
  • Robert H. Cormack

DOI: 10.3758/BF03199861

Cite this article as:
Blake, R. & Cormack, R.H. Perception & Psychophysics (1979) 26: 53. doi:10.3758/BF03199861


Observers with good stereoacuity judged which eye received sine-wave grating patterns in a two-category forced-choice procedure. Large individual differences were found, but for most observers reliable discrimination was achieved at low spatial frequencies. No observer could perform the task above chance levels at high spatial frequencies. Discrimination was unaffected by retinal location, grating orientation, grating contrast, stimulus duration, or practice with feedback. Among observers who could perform the task, the following results were obtained: (1) Introduction of high spatial frequency components did not interfere with performance so long as a low spatial frequency component was present. (2) When gratings of low equal spatial frequency were presented to both eyes simultaneously at different contrast levels, observers could identify which eye received the higher contrast. (3) At low spatial frequencies, observers could distinguish monocular from binocular presentation. (4) Temporal frequency variations (counterphase flicker) influenced performance for some observers. Binocular summation and interocular transfer were unaffected by the spatial frequency variations which modulate utrocular discrimination. A new procedure for measuring stereopsis was developed which made possible comparison of utrocular discrimination with stereopsis at specific spatial frequencies. Stereopsis appeared mildly affected by spatial frequency.

Copyright information

© Psychonomic Society, Inc. 1979

Authors and Affiliations

  • Randolph Blake
    • 1
  • Robert H. Cormack
    • 2
  1. 1.Cresap Neuroscience LaboratoryNorthwestern UniversityEvanston
  2. 2.New Mexico Institute of Mining and TechnologySocorro

Personalised recommendations