Perception & Psychophysics

, Volume 18, Issue 1, pp 1–8 | Cite as

Discrimination of short temporal intervals: A comparison of two models

  • David J. Getty


Duration-discrimination data from an experiment using empty auditory intervals in a two-alternative forced-choice paradigm are presented. The observed functional relationship between standard deviation of the psychometric density function and stimulus duration is shown to be fit significantly better by a Weber’s law model of duration discrimination than by Creelman’s counter model. Both models fail to predict the rapid rise in the Weber fraction observed for durations longer than about 2 sec. However, the Weber’s law model, based on a generalization of Weber’s law, accurately predicts the initial drop in the Weber fraction for very short durations and the observed constancy of the Weber fraction for durations up to 2 sec.


  1. Abel, S. M. Duration discrimination of noise and tone bursts.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1972,51, 1219–1223. (a)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Abel, S. M. Discrimination of temporal gaps.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1972,52, 519–524. (b)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Allan, L. G., &Kristofferson, A. B. Psychophysical theories of duration discrimination.Perception & Psychophysics. (1974,16, 26–34.Google Scholar
  4. Allan, L. G., Kristofferson, A. B., &Rice, M. E. Some aspects of perceptual coding of duration in visual duration discrimination.Perception & Psychophysics, 1974,15, 83–88.Google Scholar
  5. Allan, L. G., Kristofferson, A. B., &Wiens.E. W. Duration discrimination of brief light flashes.Perception & Psychophysics, 19719, 327–334.Google Scholar
  6. Blakely, W. A. The discrimination of short empty temporal intervals. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Illinois. 1933.Google Scholar
  7. Creelman, C. D. Human discrimination of auditory durations.Journal or the Acoustical Society or America, 1962,34, 582–593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Holway, A. H., &Pratt, C. C. The Weber-ratio for intensive discrimination.Psychological Review, 1936,43, 322–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kinchla, J. Duration discrimination of acoustically defined intervals in the 1- to 8-sec range.Perception & Psychophysics, (1972,12, 318–320.Google Scholar
  10. Luce, R. D., &Galanter, E. Discrimination. In R. D. Luce, R. R. Bush. and E. Galanter (Eds.),Handbook of mathematical psychology (Vol, 1). New York: Wiley. 1963.Google Scholar
  11. Miller.G. A. Sensitivity to changes in the intensity of white noise and its relation to masking and loudness.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1947,19, 609–619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Small, A. M., Jr,. &Campbell, R. A. Temporal differential sensitivity for auditory stimuli.American Journal of Psychology, (1962,75, 401–410.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Stott, L. H. The discrimination of short tonal durations. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois, 1933.Google Scholar
  14. Stott, L. H. Time-order errors in the discrimination of short tonal durations.Journal of Experimental Psychology, (1935,18, 741–766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Woodrow, H. The effect of practice upon time-order errors in the comparison of temporal intervals.Psychological Review, 1935,42, 127–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Woodrow, H. Time perception. In S. S. Stevens (Ed.),Handbook of experimental psychology, New York: Wiley. 1951.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Psychonomic Society, Inc. 1975

Authors and Affiliations

  • David J. Getty
    • 1
  1. 1.Psychology DepartmentBrown UniversityProvidence

Personalised recommendations