Animal Learning & Behavior

, Volume 26, Issue 2, pp 210–218 | Cite as

Memory for recent actions in the bottlenosed dolphin (Tursiops truncatus): Repetition of arbitrary behaviors using an abstract rule

  • Eduardo Mercado
  • Scott O. Murray
  • Robert K. Uyeyama
  • Adam A. Pack
  • Louis M. Herman
Article
  • 648 Downloads

Abstract

Little is known about how animals represent their own actions in working memory. We investigated whether bottlenosed dolphins could recall actions they had recently performed and reveal those recollections using an abstract rule. Two dolphins were trained to respond to a specific gestural command by repeating the last behavior performed. Both dolphins proved to be able to repeat a wide variety of behaviors on command and were able to generalize the repeating rule to novel behaviors and situations. One dolphin was able to repeat all 36 behaviors she was tested on, including behaviors involving multiple simultaneous actions and self-selected behaviors. These results suggest that dolphins can flexibly access memories of their recent actions and that these memories are of sufficient detail to allow for reenactments. The repeating task can potentially be used to investigate short-term action and event representations in a variety of species.

References

  1. Beninger, R. J., Kendall, S. B., &Vanderwolf, C. H. (1974). The ability of rats to discriminate their own behavior.Canadian Journal of Psychology,28, 79–91.Google Scholar
  2. Braslau-Schneck, S. (1994).Innovative behaviors and synchronization in bottlenosed dolphins. Unpublished master’s thesis, University of Hawaii, Honolulu.Google Scholar
  3. Custance, D. M., Whiten, A., &Bard, K. A. (1995). Can young chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) imitate arbitrary actions? Hayes & Hayes (y1952) revisited.Behaviour,132, 837–859.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Di Pellegrino, G., Fadiga, L., Fogassi, L., Gallese, V., &Rizzolatti, G. (1992). Understanding motor events: A neurophysiological study.Experimental Brain Research,91, 176–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Galef, B. G., Jr. (1988). Imitation in animals: History, definitions and interpretation of data from the psychological laboratory. In T. Zentall & B. Galef (Eds.),Social learning: Psychological and biological perspectives (pp. 3–28). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  6. Gallese, V., Fadiga, L., Fogassi, L., &Rizzolatti, G. (1996). Action recognition in the premotor cortex.Brain,119, 593–609.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hayes, K. J., &Hayes, C. (1952). Imitation in a home-raised chimpanzee.Journal of Comparative Physiology & Psychology,45, 31–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Herman, L. M., &Forestell, P. H. (1985). Reporting presence or absence of named objects by a language trained dolphin.Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews,9, 667–691.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Herman, L. M., Morrel-Samuels, P., &Pack, A. A. (1990). Bottlenosed dolphin and human recognition of veridical and degraded displays of an artificial gestural language.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,119, 215–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Herman, L. M., Pack, A. A., &Morrel-Samuels, P. (1993). Representational and conceptual skills of dolphins. In H. R. Roitblat, L. M. Herman, & P. Nachtigall (Eds.),Language and communication: Comparative perspectives (pp. 299–308). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  11. Herman, L. M., Pack, A. A., &Wood, A. M. (1994). Bottlenosed dolphins can generalize rules and develop abstract concepts.Marine Mammal Science,10, 70–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Herman, L. M., Richards, D. G., &Wolz, J. P. (1984). Comprehension of sentences by bottlenosed dolphins.Cognition,16, 129–219.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Heyes, C. M. (1994). Social learning in animals: Categories and mechanisms.Biological Review,69, 207–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Jeannerod, M. (1994). The representing brain: Neural correlates of motor intention and imagery.Behavioral & Brain Sciences,17, 187–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Killeen, P. R. (1994). Mathematical principles of reinforcement.Behavioral & Brain Sciences,17, 105–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kramer, S. P. (1982). Memory for recent behavior in the pigeon.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,38, 71–85.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Mitchell, R. W., &Anderson, J. R. (1993). Discrimination learning of scratching, but failure to obtain imitation and self-recognition in a long-tailed macaque.Primates,34, 301–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Morgan, M. J., &Nicholas, D. J. (1979). Discrimination between reinforced action patterns in the rat.Learning & Motivation,10, 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Pack, A. A., &Herman, L. M. (1995). Sensory integration in the bottlenosed dolphin: Immediate recognition of complex shapes across the senses of echolocation and vision.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,98, 722–733.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Premack, D. (1976).Intelligence in ape and man. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  21. Premack, D. (1986).Gavagai! Or the future history of the animal language controversy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  22. Pryor, K., Haag, R., &O’Reilly, J. (1969). The creative porpoise: Training for novel behavior.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,12, 653–661.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Richards, D. G. (1986). Dolphin vocal mimicry and vocal object labeling. In R. J. Schusterman, J. A. Thomas, & F. G. Wood (Eds.),Dolphin cognition and behavior: A comparative approach (pp. 273–288). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  24. Richards, D. G., Wolz, J. P., &Herman, L. M. (1984). Vocal mimicry of computer-generated sounds and vocal labeling of objects by a bottlenosed dolphin,Tursiops truncatus.Journal of Comparative Psychology,98, 10–28.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Rizzolatti, G., Fadiga, L., Gallese, V., &Fogassi, L. (1996). Premotor cortex and the recognition of motor actions.Cognitive Brain Research,3, 131–141.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Roitblat, H. L. (1982). The meaning of representation in animal memory.Behavioral & Brain Sciences,5, 353–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Roitblat, H. L. (1987).Introduction to comparative cognition. New York: Freeman.Google Scholar
  28. Schusterman, R. J., Gisiner, R., Grimm, B. K., &Hanggi, B. (1993). Behavior control by exclusion and attempts to establish semanticity in marine mammals using match-to-sample paradigms. In H. R. Roitblat, L. M. Herman, & P. Nachtigall (Eds.),Language and communication: Comparative perspectives (pp. 249–274). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  29. Shimp, C. P. (1981). The local organization of behavior: Discrimination of and memory for simple behavioral patterns.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,36, 303–315.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Shimp, C. P. (1982). On metaknowledge in the pigeon: An organism’s knowledge about its own behavior.Animal Learning & Behavior,10, 358–364.Google Scholar
  31. Shimp, C. P. (1983). The local organization of behavior: Dissociations between a pigeon’s behavior and self-reports of that behavior.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,39, 61–68.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Shimp, C. P. (1984). Self reports by rats of the temporal patterning of their behavior: A dissociation between tacit knowledge and knowledge. In H. R. Roitblat, T. G. Bever, & H. S. Terrace (Eds.),Animal cognition (pp. 215–229). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  33. Tayler, C. K., &Saayman, G. S. (1973). Imitative behavior of Indian Ocean bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops aduncus) in captivity.Behaviour,44, 286–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Taylor, K. B. (1995).Self-selection and self-monitoring of behavior by bottlenosed dolphins (Tursiops truncatus). Unpublished master’s thesis, University of Hawaii, Honolulu.Google Scholar
  35. Tomasello, M., Savage-Rumbaugh, S., &Kruger, A. C. (1994). Imitative learning of actions on objects by children, chimpanzees, and enculturated chimpanzees.Child Development,64, 1688–1705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Urcuioli, P. J. (1984). Overshadowing in matching-to-sample: Reduction in sample-stimulus control by differential sample behaviors.Animal Learning & Behavior,12, 256–264.Google Scholar
  37. Urcuioli, P. J., &DeMarse, T. (1994). On the relationship between differential outcomes and differential sample responding in matching-to-sample.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,20, 249–263.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Urcuioli, P. J., &Honig, W. K. (1980). Control of choice in conditional discriminations by sample-specific behaviors.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,6, 251–277.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Whiten, A., &Hamm, R. (1992). On the nature and evolution of imitation in the animal kingdom: Reappraisal of a century of research.Advances in the Study of Behavior,21, 239–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Xitco, M. J., Jr. (1988).Mimicry of modeled behaviors by bottlenosed dolphins. Unpublished master’s thesis, University of Hawaii, Honolulu.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Psychonomic Society, Inc. 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eduardo Mercado
    • 1
  • Scott O. Murray
    • 1
  • Robert K. Uyeyama
    • 1
  • Adam A. Pack
    • 1
  • Louis M. Herman
    • 1
  1. 1.Kewalo Basin Marine Mammal LaboratoryUniversity of HawaiiHonolulu

Personalised recommendations