Animal Learning & Behavior

, Volume 24, Issue 3, pp 300–309 | Cite as

Intratrial proactive interference in rats’ serial alternation performance in the radial maze



Rats acquired a serial alternation task in an eight-arm radial maze that was partitioned into four pairs of arms. Each pair was associated with a different distal stimulus. Rats were initially forced to the left or right arm in each pair (the study segment) before being exposed to both arms in each pair (the free-choice or test segment). Only the previously blocked arm of each pair remained baited. Following initial training, proactive interference (PI) was induced by presenting rats with a forced-choice (prestudy) segment containing arm positions opposite those in the subsequent study segment. Such trials generated poorer free-choice accuracy than did trials without a prestudy segment. Forcing rats to both arms in the pair in a prestudy segment produced only transient PI. A slight improvement in rats’ free-choice performance was obtained by forcing them to the same arm position, but only when the test segment was delayed by 30 min. Increasing the interval between the prestudy and study segments from 2 to 30 min eliminated PI, but only when free-choice testing was delayed by 2 min rather than by 30 min. These results suggest that intratrial PI in this preparation was primarily due to confusion about which arm position in each pair had been visited during the last forced-choice segment.


Serial Position Proactive Interference Radial Maze Test Segment Interval Sequence 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Beatty, W. W., &Shavalia, D. A. (1980). Rat spatial memory: Resistance to retroactive interference at long retention intervals.Animal Learning & Behavior,8, 550–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cohen, J. S., Reid, S., &Chew, K. (1994). Effects of varying trial distribution, intra- and extramaze cues, and amount of reward on proactive interference in the radial maze.Animal Learning & Behavior,22, 134–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Dale, R. H. I., &Roberts, W. A. (1986). Variations in radial maze performance under different levels of food and water deprivation.Animal Learning & Behavior,14, 60–64.Google Scholar
  4. D’Amato, M. R. (1973). Delayed matching and short-term memory in monkeys. In G. H. Bower (Ed.),The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 7, pp. 227–269). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  5. Gordon, W. C., Brennan, M. J., &Schlesinger, J. L. (1976). The interaction of memories in the rat: Effects on short-term retention performance.Learning & Motivation,7, 406–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gordon, W. C., &Feldman, D. T. (1978). Reactivation-induced interference in a short-term retention paradigm.Learning & Motivation,9, 164–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Grant, D. S. (1975). Proactive interference in pigeon short-term memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,1, 207–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Grant, D. S. (1980). Delayed alternation in the rat: Effect of contextual stimuli on proactive interference.Learning & Motivation,11, 339–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Grant, D. S. (1981). Intertrial interference in rat short-term memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,7, 217–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Grant, D. S., &Roberts, W. A. (1973). Trace interaction in pigeon short-term memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology,101, 21–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hoffman, N., &Maki, W. S. (1986). Two sources of proactive interference in spatial working memory: Multiple effects of repeated trials on radial maze performance by rats.Animal Learning & Behavior,14, 65–72.Google Scholar
  12. Jitsumori, M., Wright, A. A., &Cook, R. G. (1988). Long-term proactive interference and novelty enhancement effects in monkey list memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,14, 146–154.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Jitsumori, M., Wright, A. A., &Shyan, M. R. (1989). Build up and release from proactive interference in a rhesus monkey.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,15, 329–337.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kendrick, D. F., &Rilling, M. E. (1986). AIM: A theory of active and inactive memory. In D. F. Kendrick, M. E. Rilling, & M. R. Denny (Eds.),Theories of animal memory (pp. 129–152). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  15. Maki, W. S. (1985). Differential effects of electroconvulsive shock on concurrent spatial memories: “Old” memories are impaired while “new” memories are spared.Behavioral & Neural Biology,43, 162–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Maki, W. S., Beatty, W. W., Hoffman, N., Bierley, R. A., &Clouse, B. A. (1984). Spatial memory over long retention intervals: Nonmemorial factors are not necessary for accurate performance on the radial arm maze by rats.Behavioral & Neural Biology,41, 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Olton, D. S., &Samuelson, R. J. (1976). Remembrance of places passed: Spatial memory in rats.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,2, 97–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Postman, L., &Underwood, B. J. (1973). Critical issues in interference theory.Memory & Cognition,1, 19–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Roberts, W. A. (1974). Spaced repetition facilitates short-term retention in the rat.Journal of Comparative & Physiological Psychology,86, 164–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Roberts, W. A., &Dale, R. H. I. (1981). Remembrance of places lasts: Proactive inhibition and patterns of choice in rat spatial memory.Learning & Motivation,12, 261–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Santiago, H. C., &Wright, A. A. (1984). Pigeon memory:Same/different concept learning, serial probe recognition acquisition, and probe delay effects on the serial-position function.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,10, 498–512.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Suzuki, S., Augerinos, G., &Black, A. H. (1980). Stimulus control of spatial behavior on the eight-arm maze in rats.Learning & Motivation,11, 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Terry, W. S. (1992, November).Effects of nonreward in a serial-maze task. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychonomic Society, St. Louis.Google Scholar
  24. Winograd, E. (1971). Some issues relating animal memory to human memory. In W. K. Honig & P. H. R. James (Eds.),Animal memory (pp. 259-278). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  25. Wright, A. A., Santiago, H. C., &Sands, S. F. (1984). Monkey memory:Same/different concept learning, serial-probe acquisition, and probe delay effects.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,10, 513–529.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Wright, A. A., Urcuioli, P. J., &Sands, S. F. (1986). Proactive interference in animal memory. In D. F. Kendrick, M. E. Rilling, & M. R. Denny (Eds.),Theories of animal memory (pp. 101–125). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  27. Zentall, T. R., &Hogan, D. E. (1977). Short-term proactive inhibition in the pigeon.Learning & Motivation,8, 367–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Zoladek, L., &Roberts, W. A. (1978). The sensory basis of spatial memory in the rat.Animal Learning & Behavior,6, 77–81.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Psychonomic Society, Inc. 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of WindsorWindsorCanada

Personalised recommendations