Advertisement

Perception & Psychophysics

, Volume 21, Issue 6, pp 575–580 | Cite as

Recognizing the sex of a walker from a dynamic point-light display

  • Lynn T. Kozlowski
  • James E. Cutting
Article

Abstract

The sex of human walkers can be recognized without familiarity cues from displays of pointlight sources mounted on major joints. Static versions of these abstract displays do not permit accurate recognition of sex. Variation in the degree of armswing or in walking speed generally interferes with recognition, except that faster speeds are associated somewhat with improved recognition of females. Lights on upper-body joints permit more accurate guesses than do Lights on lower-body joints, but identification is possible even from minimal displays, with lights placed only on the ankles. No feedback was given to observers. Confidence judgments of sex relate to the accuracy of responses in a manner that suggests that viewers know what they are doing.

Keywords

Motion Perception Static Display Test Tape Dynamic Display Visual Motion Perception 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Cutting, J. E., &Kozlowski, L. T. Recognizing friends by their walk: Gait perception without familiarity cues.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 1977,9, 353–356.Google Scholar
  2. Johansson, G. Visual perception of biological motion and a model for its analysis.Perception & Psychophysics, 1973,14, 201–211.Google Scholar
  3. Johansson, G. Projective transformations as determining visual space perception. In R. B. MacLeod & H. L. Pick (Eds.).Perception: Essays in honor of J. J. Gibson. Ithaca, N.Y: Cornell University Press, 1974.Google Scholar
  4. Johansson, G. Visual motion perception.Scientific American, 1975,232(6), 76–89.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Johansson, G. Spatio-temporal differentiation and integration in visual motion perception.Psychological Research, 1976,38. 379–393.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Maas, J. B., &Johansson, G.Motion perception I: 2-dimensional motion perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1971 (film), (a)Google Scholar
  7. Maas, J. B., &Johansson, G.Motion perception II: 3-dimensional motion perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1971 (film). (b)Google Scholar
  8. Shaw, R. E., McIntyre, M., &Macf, W. M. The role of symmetry in event perception. In R. B. MacLeod & H. L. Pick (Eds.),Perception: Essays in honor of J. J. Gibson. Ithaca, N.Y: Cornell University Press, 1974.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Psychonomic Society, Inc. 1977

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lynn T. Kozlowski
    • 1
  • James E. Cutting
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyWesleyan UniversityMiddletown

Personalised recommendations