Memory & Cognition

, Volume 28, Issue 3, pp 341–348 | Cite as

On the interpretation of working memory span in adults

Article
  • 1.5k Downloads

Abstract

Experimental research into children’s working memory span has shown that retention duration contributes substantially to span performance, while processing efficiency need not be related to concurrent memory load (Towse, Hitch, & Hutton, 1998). These findings have been used to argue for a model of working memory span that emphasizes time-based forgetting rather than the popular resource-sharing or tradeoff framework. The present paper considers whether adults perform working memory span tasks in a qualitatively different way. Data from reading span and operation span tasks show that adults’ performance can be distinguished from that of children, but also that a task-switching model of working memory span can explain some important aspects of performance.

References

  1. Adams, J. W., &Hitch, G. J. (1997). Working memory and children’s mental addition.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology,67, 21–38.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Baddeley, A. D. (1986).Working memory. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
  3. Baddeley, A. D., &Hitch, G. J. (1974). Working memory. In G. Bower (Ed.),The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 8, pp. 47–89). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  4. Byrne, M. D. (1998). Taking a computational approach to aging: The SPAN theory of working memory.Psychology & Aging,13, 309–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Caplan, D., &Waters, G. S. (1999). Working memory and sentence comprehension.Behavioral & Brain Sciences,22, 77–126.Google Scholar
  6. Case, R., Kurland, M., &Goldberg, J. (1982). Operational efficiency and the growth of short-term memory span.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology,33, 386–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Conway, A. R. A., &Engle, R. W. (1994). Working memory and retrieval: A resource-dependent inhibition model.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,123, 354–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Conway, A. R. A., &Engle, R. W. (1996). Individual differences in working memory capacity: More evidence for a general capacity theory.Memory,4, 577–590.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Craik, F. I. M., &Tulving, E. (1975). Depth of processing and the retention of words in episodic memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,104, 268–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Daneman, M. (1995). Review of “Working-memory and severe learning difficulties” Hulme, C. & Mackenzie, S.American Journal of Psychology,108, 464–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Daneman, M., &Carpenter, P. A. (1980). Individual differences in working memory and reading.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,19, 450–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Daneman, M., &Carpenter, P. A. (1983). Individual differences in integrating information between and within sentences.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,9, 561–584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Duff, S., & Logie, R. (in press).Processing and storage in working memory span. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology.Google Scholar
  14. Ekstrom, R. B., French, J.W., Harmen, H. H., &Dermen, D. (1976).Manual for kit of factor-referenced cognitive tests. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.Google Scholar
  15. Engle, R. W. (1996). Working memory and retrieval: An inhibitionresource approach. In J. T. E. Richardson, R. Engle, L. Hasher, R. Logie, E. Stolzfus, & R. Zacks (Eds.),Working memory and cognition (pp. 89–120). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Engle, R. W., Cantor, J., &Carullo, J. J. (1992). Individual differences in working memory and comprehension: A test of four hypotheses.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,18, 972–992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Engle, R.W., Tuholski, S.W., Laughlin, J. E., &Conway, A. R. A. (1999). Working memory, short-term memory and general fluid intelligence: A latent variable approach.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,128, 309–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Halford, G. S., Maybery, M. T., O’Hare, A.W., &Grant, P. (1994). The development of memory and processing capacity.Child Development,65, 1330–1348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hasher, L., &Zacks, R. T. (1988). Working memory, comprehension, and aging: A review and a new view. In G. H. Bower (Ed.),The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (pp. 193–225). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  20. Hitch, G. J., &Baddeley, A. D. (1976). Verbal reasoning and working memory.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,28, 603–621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hitch, G. J., Towse, J. N., & Hutton, U. (1999). What limits children’s working memory span? Theoretical accounts and applications for scholastic development.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General.Google Scholar
  22. Hutton, U., Towse, J. N., & Hitch, G. J. (1997).Children’s competence at solving arithmetic operations in a working memory task (Tech. Rep. No. CDRG2). University of London, Royal Holloway.Google Scholar
  23. Kyllonen, P. C., &Christal, R. E. (1991). Reasoning ability is (little more than) working memory capacity?!Intelligence,14, 389–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. La Pointe, L. B., &Engle, R. W. (1990). Simple and complex word spans as measures of working memory capacity.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,16, 1118–1133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Miyake, A., Just, M. A., &Carpenter, P. A. (1994). Working memory constraints on the resolution of lexical ambiguity: Maintaining multiple interpretations in neutral contexts.Journal of Memory & Language,33, 175–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Rosen, V. M., &Engle, R. W. (1998). Working memory capacity and suppression.Journal of Memory & Language,39, 418–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Tirre, W. C., &Peña, C. M. (1992). Investigation of functional working memory in the reading span test.Journal of Educational Psychology,84, 462–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Towse, J. N., &Hitch, G. J. (1995). Is there a relationship between task demand and storage space in tests of working memory capacity?Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,48A, 108–124.Google Scholar
  29. Towse, J. N., Hutton, U., & Hitch, G. J. (1997). Humpty Dumpty had a great … banana? Children’s sentence completions on a working memory reading task (Tech. Rep. No. CDRG1). University of London, Royal Holloway.Google Scholar
  30. Towse, J. N., Hitch, G. J., &Hutton, U. (1998). A reevaluation of working memory capacity in children.Journal of Memory & Language,39, 195–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Towse, J. N., Hitch, G. J., &Hutton, U. (1999). The Resource King is dead! Long live the Resource King!Behavioral & Brain Sciences,22, 111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Turner, M. L., &Engle, R. W. (1989). Is working memory capacity task dependent?Journal of Memory & Language,28, 127–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Waters, G. S., &Caplan, D. (1996). The measurement of verbal working memory capacity and its relation to reading comprehension.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,49A, 51–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Psychonomic Society, Inc. 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Royal HollowayUniversity of LondonLondonEngland
  2. 2.University of LancasterLancasterEngland

Personalised recommendations