Memory & Cognition

, Volume 18, Issue 5, pp 496–506 | Cite as

Vivid memories of emotional events: The accuracy of remembered minutiae

  • Friderike Heuer
  • Daniel Reisberg


It has been claimed that emotional arousal causes a narrowing of attention, and, therefore, impoverished memory encoding. On this view, if details of an emotional event are reported subsequently, these details must be after-the-fact reconstructions that are open to error. Our study challenges these claims. Using a long-term (2-week), incidental learning procedure, wefound that emotion promotes memory both for information central to an event and for peripheral detail. This contrasts with the results of explicit instructions to remember or to attend closely to the event, both of which seem to promote memory for the event’s gist at the expense of detail. The likely mechanisms underlying these effects are discussed.


Emotional Event Neutral Group Intrusion Error Arousal Version Arousal Group 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Bartlett, F. C. (1932).Remembering: A study in experimental and social psychology. Cambndge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Bohlin, G., &Graham, F. K. (1977). Cardiac deceleration and reflex blink facilitation.Psychophysiology,14, 423–430.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Brown, R., &Kuuk, J. (1977). Flashbulb memories.Cognition,5, 73–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bruner, J., Matter, J., &Papanek, M. (1955). Breadth of learning as a function of drive level and mechanization.Psychological Review,42, 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Christianson, S. A. (1984). The relationship between induced emotional arousal and amnesia.Scandinavian Journal of Psychology,25, 147–160.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Christianson, S-A., &Lorrus, E. F. (1987). Memory for traumatic events.Applied Cognitive Psychology,1, 225–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Christianson, S. A., Loftus, E. F., & Nisson, L. (1987, November).Memory for emotional events. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Seattle, WA.Google Scholar
  8. Clark, M. S., Milberg, S., &Ross, J. (1983). Arousal cues arousalrelated material in memory: Implications for understanding effects of mood on memory.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,22, 633–649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Easterbrook, J. (1959). The effect of emotion on cue utilization and the organization of behavior.Psychological Review,66, 183–201.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Eysenck, M. (1982).Attention and arousal: Cognition andperformance. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  11. Gold, P. (1987). Sweet memories.American Scientist,75, 151–155.Google Scholar
  12. Graham, F. K. (1979). Distinguishing among orienting, defense and startle reflexes. In H. D. Kimmel, E. H. van Olst, & J. G. Ortebeke (Eds.),The orienting reflex in humans (pp. 137–167). Hiltsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  13. Kahneman, D. (1973).Attention and effort. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  14. Kleinsmith, L., &Kaplan, S. (1963). Paired associate teaming as a function of arousal and interpolated interval.Journal of Experimental Psychology,65, 190–193.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Lacey, J., &Lacey, B. (1974). On heart rate responses and behavior: A reply to Elliott.Journal of Personality & Social Psychology,30, 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Livingston, R. (1967). Brain circuitry relating to complex behavior. In G. Quarton, T. Melnechuck, & F. Schmitt (Eds.),The neurosciences: A study program (pp. 499–514). New York: Rockefeller University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Lovrus, E. F. (1979).Eyewitness testimony. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Loftus, E. F. (1982). Remembering recent experiences. In L. Cermak (Ed.),Human memory and amnesia (pp. 239–255). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  19. Lovrus, E. F., &Burns, T. (1982). Mental shock can produce retrograde amnesia.Memory & Cognition,10, 318–323.Google Scholar
  20. Mandler, G. (1975).Mind and emotion. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  21. Marks, D. (1972). Individual differences in the vividness of visual imagery and their effect on function. In P. Sheehan (Ed.),The fanction and nature of imagery (pp. 83–108). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  22. Mccloskey, M., &Egeth, H. (1983). Eyewitness identification: What can a psychologist tell a jury?American Psychologist,38, 550–563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. McCloskey, M., Wible, C., &Cohen, N. (1988). Is there a special flashbulb-memory mechanism?Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,117, 171–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mehrabian, A. (1977). Individual differences in stimulus screening and arousability.Journal of Personality,45, 237–250.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Minsky, M. (1975). Aframework for representing knowledge. In P. H. Winston (Ed.),The psychology of computer vision (pp. 211–277). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  26. Neisser, U. (Ed.) (1982).Memory observed: Remembering in natural contexts. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar
  27. Neisser, U. (1986). Remembering Pearl Harbor: Reply to Thompson and Cowan.Cognition,23, 285–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Pillemer, D. (1984). Flashbulb memories of the assassination attempt on President Reagan.Cognition,16, 63–80.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Reisberg, D., Heuer, F., Mclean, J., &O’Shaughnessy, M. (1988). The quantity, not the quality, of affect predicts memory vividness.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,26, 100–103.Google Scholar
  30. Rosch, E. (1978). Principles of categorization. In E. Rosch & B. B. Lloyd (Eds.),Cognition and categorization (pp. 27–48). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  31. Rubin, D., &Kozin, M. (1984). Vivid memories.Cognition,16, 81–95.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Rubin, D. (1986).Autobiographical memory. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Thompson, C., &Cowan, T. (1986). Flashbulb memories: A nicer interpretation of a Neisser recollection.Cognition,22, 199–200.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Psychonomic Society, Inc. 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • Friderike Heuer
    • 1
  • Daniel Reisberg
    • 1
  1. 1.Psychology DepartmentReed CollegePortland

Personalised recommendations