Memory & Cognition

, Volume 7, Issue 6, pp 426–434

Effort toward comprehension: Elaboration or “aha”?

  • Pamela M. Auble
  • Jeffery J. Franks
  • Salvatore A. Soraci
  • Salvatore A. Soraci
  • Salvatore A. Soraci
Article

Abstract

Auble and Franks (1978) found that a process termed “effort toward comprehension” was important in facilitating recall of sentences. Four experiments were conducted to further elucidate the nature of this process. Two hypotheses were considered: (1)Effort toward comprehension involves greater elaboration or deeper processing of the sentence; (2)effort toward comprehension can be viewed as an “aha” experience (i.e., a state of noncomprehension followed by comprehension of the sentence). Results indicated that recall was significantly greater for subjects in conditions producing “aha” reactions. No support was found for the elaboration interpretation of effort toward comprehension.

References

  1. Auble, P. M., &Franks, J. J. The effects of effort toward comprehension on recall.Memory & Cognition, 1978,6, 20–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bransford, J. D., Franks, J. J., Morris, C. D., &Stein, B. S. Some general constraints on learning and memory research. In L. S. Cermak & F. I. M. Craik (Eds.),Levels of processing and human memory. Hillsdale, N.J: Erlbaum, 1979.Google Scholar
  3. Bransford, J. D., &Mccarrell, N. S. A sketch of a cognitive approach to comprehension: Some thoughts about understanding what it means to comprehend. In W. B. Weimer & D. Palermo (Eds.),Cognition and the symbolic processes. Hillsdale, N.J: Erlbaum, 1974.Google Scholar
  4. Clark, H. H. The language-as-fixed-effect fallacy: A critique of language statistics in psychological research.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1973,12, 335–359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. CraiK, F. I. M., &Lockhart, R. S. Levels of processing: A framework for memory research.Journal of Verbal Learmng and Verbal Behavior, 1972,11, 671–684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Craik, F. I. M., &Tulwng, E. Depth of processing and the retention of words in episodic memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 1975,104, 268–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Forster.K. I., &Dickinson, R. G. More on the language-asfixed-effect fallacy: Monte Carlo estimates of error rates for F1, F2, F’, and min F’.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1976,15, 135–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Johnson, M. K., Doll, T. J., Bransford, J. D., &Lapinski, R. H. Context effects in sentence memory.Journal of ExperimentalPsychology, 1974,103, 358–360.Google Scholar
  9. Kirt, R. E.Experimental design: Procedures for the behavioral sciences. Belmont, Calif: Brooks-Cole, 1968.Google Scholar
  10. Tulving, E., &Thomson, D. M. Encoding specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory.Psychological Review, 1973,80, 352–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Psychonomic Society, Inc. 1979

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pamela M. Auble
    • 1
  • Jeffery J. Franks
    • 1
  • Salvatore A. Soraci
    • 1
  • Salvatore A. Soraci
    • 1
  • Salvatore A. Soraci
    • 1
  1. 1.Vanderbiit UniversityNashville

Personalised recommendations