Memory & Cognition

, Volume 15, Issue 3, pp 199–207 | Cite as

Phonological coding in word reading: Evidence from hearing and deaf readers

  • Vicki L. Hanson
  • Carol A. Fowler
Article

Abstract

The ability of prelingually, profoundly deaf readers to access phonological information during reading was investigated in three experiments. The experiments employed a task, developed by Meyer, Schvaneveldt, and Ruddy (1974), in which lexical decision response times (RTs) to orthographically similar rhyming (e.g., WAVE-SAVE) and nortrhyming (e.g., HAVE-CAVE) word pairs were compared with RTs to orthographically and phonologically dissimilar control word pairs. The subjects of the study were deaf college students and hearing college students. In Experiments 1 and 2, in which the nonwords were pronounceable, the deaf subjects, like the hearing subjects, were facilitated in their RTs to rhyming pairs, but not to nonrhyming pairs. In Experiment 3, in which the nonwords were unpronounceable, both deaf and hearing subjects were facilitated in their RTs to both rhyming and nonrhyming pairs, with the facilitation being significantly greater for the rhyming pairs. These results indicate that access to phonological information is possible despite prelingual and profound hearing impairment. As such, they run counter to claims that deaf individuals are limited to the use of visual strategies in reading. Given the impoverished auditory, experience of such readers, these results suggest that the use of phonological information need not be tied to the auditory modality.

References

  1. Blanton, R. L., Nunnally, J. C., &Odom, P. B. (1967). Graphemic, phonetic, and associative factors in the verbal behavior of deaf and hearing subjects.Journal of Speech & Hearing Research,10, 225–231.Google Scholar
  2. Chomsky, N., &Halle, M. (1968).The sound pattern of English. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  3. Conrad, R. (1979).The deaf school child. London: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  4. Crowder, R. G. (1982).The psychology of reading: An introduction. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Evett, L. J., &Humphreys, G. W. (1981). The use of abstract graphemic information in lexical access.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,33A, 325–350.Google Scholar
  6. Gates-MacGinitie Reading Tests. (1969). New York: Columbia Teachers’ College Press.Google Scholar
  7. Gates-MacGinitie Reading Tests (2nd ed.) (1978). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  8. Gleitman, L. R., &Rozin, P. (1977). The structure and acquisition of reading: I. Relations between orthographies and the structure of language. In A. S. Reber & D. L. Scarborough (Eds.),Toward a psychology of reading. Hillsdale, NJ: ErlbaumGoogle Scholar
  9. Hanson, V. L. (1982). Short-term recall by deaf signers of American Sign Language: Implications for order recall.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, &Cognition.8, 572–583CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hanson, V. L., Liberman, I. Y., &Shankweiler, D. (1984). Linguistic coding by deaf children in relation to beginning reading success.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology,37, 378–393.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Lichtsnstein, E. H. (in press). The relationships between reading processes and English skills of deaf college students: Part If.Applied Psycholinguistics.Google Scholar
  12. Linell, P. (1979).Psychological reality in phonology. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Meyer, D. E., Schvaneveldt, R. W., &Ruddy, M. G. (1974). Functions of graphemic and phonemic codes in visual word-recognition.Memory & Cognition,2, 309–321.Google Scholar
  14. Schulman, H. G., Hornak, R., &Sanders, E. (1978). The effects of graphemic, phonetic, and semantic relationships on access to lexical structures.Memory & Cognition,6, 115–123.Google Scholar
  15. Steinberg, D. (1973). Phonology, reading and Chomsky’s optimal orthography.Journal of Psycholinguistic Research,2, 239–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Wike, E. L., &Church, J. D. (1976). Comments on Clark’s “The language-as-fixed-effect fallacy”.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,15, 249–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Psychonomic Society, Inc. 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • Vicki L. Hanson
    • 1
  • Carol A. Fowler
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Haskins LaboratoriesNew Haven
  2. 2.Dartmouth CollegeHanover

Personalised recommendations