Memory & Cognition

, Volume 15, Issue 3, pp 181–198 | Cite as

A ROWS is a ROSE: Spelling, sound, and reading

  • Guy C. van Orden
Article

Abstract

Skilled readers generally are assumed to make little or no use of words’ phonological features in visual word identification. Contrary to this assumption, college students’ performance in the present reading experiments showed large effects of stimulus word phonology. In Experiments 1 and 2, these subjects produced larger false positive error rates in a semantic categorization task when they responded to stimulus foils that were homophonic to category exemplars (e.g., ROWS for the category A FLOWER) than when they responded to spelling control foils. Additionally, in Experiment 2, this homophony effect was found under brief-exposure pattern-masking conditions, a result consistent with the possibility that phonology is an early source of constraint in word identification. Subjects did, however, correctly reject most homophone foils in Experiments 1 and 2. Experiment 3 investigated the source of this ability. The results of Experiment 3 suggest that subjects detected homophone impostors, such as ROWS, by verifying target foil spellings against their knowledge of the correct spellings of category exemplars, such as ROSE.

References

  1. Aaronson, D., &Ferres, S. (1983). A model for coding lexical categories during reading.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,9, 700–725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allport, D. A. (1977). On knowing the meaning of words that we are unable to report: The effects of visual masking. In S. Dornic (Ed.),Attention and performance IV (pp. 505–533). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  3. Anderson, J. A. (1977). Neural models with cognitive implications In D. LaBerge & S. J. Samuels (Eds.),Basic processes in reading: Perception and comprehension (pp. 27–90). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  4. Anderson, J. A. (1983). Cognitive and psychological computation with neural models.IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, & Cybernetics,13, 799–815.Google Scholar
  5. Anderson, J. A., &Mozer, M. (1981). Categorization and selective neurons. In G. Hinton & J. A. Anderson (Eds.),Parallel models of associative memory (pp. 213–236). Hillsdale, NJ: ErlbaumGoogle Scholar
  6. Andrews, S. (1982). Phonological recoding. Is the regularity effect consistent?Memory & Cognition,10, 565–575Google Scholar
  7. Backman, J., Bruck, M., Hebert, M., &Seidenberg, M. (1984). Acquisition and use of spelling-sound correspondences in reading.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology,38, 114–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Baron, J. (1973). Phonemic stage not necessary for reading.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,25, 241–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Baron, J., &Strawson, C. (1976). Use of orthographic and word specific knowledge m reading words aloud.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,2, 386–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Barron, R. W. (1980). Visual-orthographic and phonological strategies in reading and spelling. In U. Frith (Ed.),Cognitive processes in spelling (pp 195–213). London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  11. Battig, W. F., &Montague, W. E. (1969). Category norms for verbal items in 56 categories: A replication and extension of the Connecticut category norms.Journal of Experimental Psychology Monographs,80(3, Pt. 2).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bauer, D., &Stanovich, K. (1980). Lexical access and the spellingto-sound regularity effect.Memory & Cognition,8, 424–432.Google Scholar
  13. Becker, C. A. (1976). Allocation of attention during visual word recognition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,2, 556–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Becker, C. A. (1980). Semantic context effects in visual word recogration: An analysis of semantic strategies.Memory & Cognition,8, 493–512.Google Scholar
  15. Becker, C. A., &Killion, T. H. (1977) Interaction of visual and cognitive effects in word recognition.Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception & Performance,3, 389–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Besner, D. (1984). Specialized processors subserving visual word recognition: Evidence for local control.Canadian Journal of Psychology,38, 94–101.Google Scholar
  17. Besner, D., Davelaar, E., Alcott, D., &Parry, P. (1984). Wholistic reading of alphabetic print: Evidence from the FDM and the FBI. In L. Henderson (Ed.),Orthographies and reading: Perspectives from cognitive psychology, neuropsychology, and linguistics (pp. 121–135). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  18. Besner, D., Davies, J., &Daniels, S. (1981). Reading for meamng: The effects of concurrent articulation.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,33A, 415–437.Google Scholar
  19. Bower, T. G. R. (1970). Reading by eye. In H. Levin & J. P. Williams (EMs.),Basic studies on reading (pp. 134–146). New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  20. Carpenter, P. A., &Just, M. A. (1981). Cognitive processes in reading: Models based on readers’ eye fixations. In A. M. Lesgold & C. A. Perfetti (Eds.),Interactive processes in reading (pp. 177–213). Hillsdale, NJ: Edbaum.Google Scholar
  21. Chomsky, C. (1970). Reading, writing, and phonology.Harvard Educational Review,40, 287–309Google Scholar
  22. Coltheart, M. (1978). Lexical access in simple reading tasks. In G. Underwood (Ed.),Strategies in information processing (pp. 151–216). London: Academic PressGoogle Scholar
  23. Coltheart, M., Davelaar, E., Jonasson, J. T., &Besner, D. (1977). Access to the internal lexicon. In S. Dornic (Ed.),Attention and performance VI (pp. 535–555). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  24. Crowder, R. G. (1982).The psychology of reading. New York: Oxford Press.Google Scholar
  25. Danks, J. H., &Hill, G. O. (1981). An interactive analysis of oral reading. In A. M. Lesgold & C. A. Perfetti (Eds.),Interactive processes in reading (pp. 131–153). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  26. Davelaar, E., Coltheart, M., Besner, D., &Jonasson, J. T. (1978). Phonological recoding and lexical access.Memory & Cognition,6, 391–402.Google Scholar
  27. Doctor, E. A., &Coltheart, M. (1980). Children’s use of phonological encoding when reading for meaning.Memory & Cognition,8, 195–209.Google Scholar
  28. Ellis, A W. (1984).Reading, writing and dyslexia. A cognitive analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbanm.Google Scholar
  29. Fowler, C. A., Napps, S. E., &Feldman, L. (1985). Relations among regular and irregular morphologically related words in the lexicon as revealed by repetition priming.Memory & Cognition,13, 241–255.Google Scholar
  30. Glushko, R. (1979). The organization and activation of orthographic knowledge in reading aloud.Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception & Performance,5, 674–691CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Glussko, R. (1981) Principles for pronouncing print: The psychology of phonology. In A. M. Lesgold & C. A. Perfetti (Eds.),Interactive processes in reading (pp. 61–84). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  32. Goodman, K S. (1969). Analysis of reading miscues. Applied psycholinguistics.Reading Research Quarterly,5, 9–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Gough, P. (1972). One second of reading. In J. K. Kavanaugh & I. G. Mattingly (Eds.),Language by ear and by eye (pp 331–358). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  34. Green, P. B., &Cosky, M. J. (1977) One second of reading again In N. J. Castellan, D. B. Pisoni, & G. R. Potts (Eds.),Cognitive theory 2 (pp 271–288). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  35. Green, D. M., &Swets, J. A. (1966).Signal detection theory and psychophysics. New York. Wiley.Google Scholar
  36. Grossberg, S., &,Stone, G. (1986). Neural dynamics of word recognition and recall: Priming, learning, and resonance.Psychological Review,93, 46–74.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Hawkins, H. L., Reicher, G. M., Rogers, M., &,Peterson, L. (1976). Flexible coding in word recognition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,2, 380–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Henderson, L. (1982).Orthography and word recognition in reading. New York. Academic Press.Google Scholar
  39. Henderson, L., &Chard, J. (1980). The reader’s implicit knowledge of orthographic structure. In U. Frith (Ed.),Cognitive processes in spelling (pp. 85–116). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  40. Johnston, J. C. (1981). Understanding word perception. Clues from studying the word-superiority effect. In O. Tzeng & H. Singer (Eds.),Perception of print: Reading research in experimental psychology. (pp. 65–84). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  41. Johnston, J. C., &,McClelland, J. L. (1980). Experimental tests of a hierarchical model of word identification.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,7, 560–572Google Scholar
  42. Jorm, A. F, &Share, D. L. (1983) Phonological recoding and reading acqmsition.Apphed Psychohnguistics,4, 103–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Kleiman, G. M. (1975). Speech recoding in reading.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,14, 323–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Kohonen, T. (1977).Associative memory. A system-theoretical approach. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  45. Kohonen, T. (1984).Self-organization and associative memory. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  46. Kolers, P. A. (1970). Three stages of reading. In H. Levin & J. P. Williams (Eds.),Basic studies on reading (pp. 90–118). New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  47. Kučera, H., &Francis, W. (1967).Computational analysis of present-day American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Lewicki, P. (1986). Processing information about covariations that cannot be articulated.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,12, 135–146,CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Lima, S. D., &Ollatsek, A. (1983) Lexical access wa an orthographic code? The basic orthographic syllabic structure (BOSS) reconsidered.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,22, 310–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. McClelland, J. L., &Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 1 An account of basic findings.Psychological Review,88, 375–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. McClelland, J. L, &Rrumelhart, D. E. (1985). Distributed memory and the representation of general and specific information.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,114, 159–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. McCusker, L. X., Hillinger, M. L., &Bias, R. G. (1981). Phonological recoding and reading.Psychological Bulletin,89, 217–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. McQuade, D. V. (1981) Variable reliance on phonological information in visual word recognition.Language & Speech,24, 99–109Google Scholar
  54. Meyer, D. E., & Gutschera, K. D. (1975, November).Orthographic versus phonemic processing of printed words. Paper presented at the meeting of The Psychonomic Society, Denver.Google Scholar
  55. Meyer, D. E., & Ruddy, M. G. (1973, November)Lexical-memory retrieval based on graphemic and phonemic representation of printed words. Paper presented at the meeting of The Psychonomic Society, St. Louis.Google Scholar
  56. Morris, W. (Ed.) (1976).The American Heritage dictionary of the English language. Boston. Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  57. Morton, J. (1969). Interaction of informatlon in word recognitionPsychological Review,76, 165–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Murrell, G. A., &Morton, J. (1974). Word recognition and morphemic structure.Journal of Experimental Psychology,102, 963–968.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Norris, D., &Brown, G. (1985). Race models and analogy theories: A dead heat?Cognition,20, 155–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Paap, K. R., Newsome, S. L., McDonald, J. E., &Schvaneveldt, R. W. (1982). An activation-verification model for letter and word recogmtion: The word-superiority effect.Psychological Review,89, 573–594.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Perfetti, C. A. (1985).Reading ability. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  62. Reicher, G. M. (1969). Perceptual recognition as a function or meaningfulness of stimulus material.Journal of Experimental Psychology,81, 275–280CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Rosenberg, C R., & Sejnowski, T. J. (1986).The effects of distributed vs. massed practice on NETtalk, a massively-parallel network that learns to read aloud. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
  64. Rosson, M. B. (1985). The interaction of pronunciation rules and lexical representations m reading aloud.Memory & Cognition,13, 90–99.Google Scholar
  65. Rubenstein, H., Lewis, S. S., &Rubenstein, M. A. (1971). Evidence for phonemic recoding in visual word recognition.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,10, 645–657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Rumelhart, D. E., Hinton, G. E., &McClelland, J. L. (1986). A general framework for parallel distributed processing. In D. E. Rumelhart, J. L. McClelland, & the PDP Research Group (Eds.),Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition: Vol. 1. Foundations (pp. 45–76). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  67. Rumelhart, D. E., Hinton, G. E., &Williams, R. J. (1986). Learning internal representations by error propagation. In D. E. Rumelhart, J. L. McClelland, & the PDP Research Group (Eds.),Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition: Vol. 1. Foundations (pp. 318–362). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  68. Rumelhart, D. E., &McClelland, J. L. (1982). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 2. The contextual enhancement effect and some tests and extensions of the model.Psychological Review,89, 60–94.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Rumelhart, D. E., &McClelland, J. L. (1986). On learning the past tenses of English verbs. In J. L. McClelland, D. E. Rumelhart, & the PDP Research Group (Eds.),Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition: Vol. 2. Applications (pp. 216–271). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  70. Schvaneveldt, R. W., &McDonald, J. E. (1981). Semantic context and the encoding of words: Evidence for two modes of stimulus analysis.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,7, 673–687CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Seidenberg, M. S. (1985). The time course of phonological code activation in two writing systems.Cognition,19, 1–30.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. Seidenberg, M. S., Waters, G. S., Barnes, M., &Tanenhaus, M. K. (1984). When does irregular spelling or pronunciation influence word recognition?Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,23, 383–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Sejnowski, T J., &Rosenberg, C. R. (1986).NETtalk A parallel network that learns to read aloud (Tech. Rep No. JHU/EECS-86/01). Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University, Electrical Engineering and Computer Science.Google Scholar
  74. Smith, F. (1971).Understanding reading. A psycholinguistic analysis of reading and learning to read. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
  75. Snodgrass, J. G., &Jarvella, R. J. (1972). Some linguistic determinants of word classification time.Psychonomic Science,27, 220–222Google Scholar
  76. Spoehr, K., &Smith, E. (1973). The role of syllables in perceptual processingCognitive Psychology,5, 71–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Stanovich, K E, &Bauer, D. W. (1978) Experiments on the spelling-to-sound regularity effect in word recognition.Memory & Cognition,6, 410–415Google Scholar
  78. Stone, G. O. (1986). An analysis of the delta rule and the learning of statistical associations. In D. E. Rumelhart, J. L. McClelland, & the PDP Research Group (Eds.),Parallel distributed processing. Explorations m the microstructure of cognition. Vol I. Foundations (pp 444–459) Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  79. Sutton, R. S., &Barto, A. G. (1981). Toward a modern theory of adaptive networks: Expectation and prediction.Psychological Review,88, 135–170.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. Taft, M. (1979). Recognition of affixed words and the word frequency effect.Memory & Cognition,7, 263–272.Google Scholar
  81. Taft, M. (1981). Prefix stripping revisited.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,20, 289–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Taft, M., &Forster, K. I. (1975). Lexical storage and retrieval of prefixed words.Journal of Verbal Learning & Behavior,14, 638–647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Underwood, G., &Thwaites, S. (1982). Automatic phonological coding of attended printed words.Memory & Cognition,10, 434–442.Google Scholar
  84. Uyeda, K. M., &Mandler, G. (1980). Prototypicality norms for 28 semantic categories.Behavior Research Methods & Instrumentation,12, 587–595.Google Scholar
  85. Van Orden, G. C. (1984).A ROWS is a/ROZ/is a ROSE: Visual, phonological, developmental and strategic influences upon lexical access. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California at San Diego.Google Scholar
  86. Van Orden, G. C., Johnston, J. C., & Hale, B. L. (in press). Word identification in reading proceeds from spelling to sound to meaning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition.Google Scholar
  87. Waters, G. S., &Seidenberg, M. S. (1985). Spelling-sound effects in reading: Time-course and decision criteria.Memory & Cognition,13, 557–572.Google Scholar
  88. Waters, G. S., Seidenberg, M. S., &Bruck, M. (1984). Children’s and adults’ use of spelling-sound information in three reading tasks.Memory & Cognition,12, 293–305.Google Scholar
  89. Weber, R. M. (1970). A linguistic analysis of first-grade reading errors.Reading Research Quarterly,5, 427–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Wheeler, D. (1970). Processes in word recognition.Cognitive Psychology,1, 59–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Winer, B. J. (1971).Statisticalprinciples in experimental design. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Psychonomic Society, Inc. 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • Guy C. van Orden
    • 1
  1. 1.University of California at San DiegoLa Jolla

Personalised recommendations