Memory & Cognition

, Volume 10, Issue 3, pp 216–224 | Cite as

Dimensions of lexical coding in Chinese and English

  • Hsuan-Chih Chen
  • James F. Juola


Phonology and orthography are closely related in some languages, such as English, and they are nearly unrelated in others, such as Chinese. The effects of these differences were assessed in a study of the roles of phonemic, graphemic, and semantic information on lexical coding and memory for Chinese logographs and English words. Some of the stimuli in the two languages were selected such that the natural confounding between phonemic and graphemic information in English was matched in the set of Chinese words used. An initial scaling study indicated that this attempt to equate degree of phonemic-graphemic confounding was successful. A second experiment used a recognition memory task for English and Chinese words with separate subject groups of native speakers of the two languages. Subjects were to select one of a pair of test words that was phonemically, graphemically, or semantically similar to a word on a previously studied list. Differences in the dimensions of lexical coding in memory were demonstrated in significant Stimulus Type by Decision Type interactions in the recognition data. Chinese-speaking subjects responded most rapidly and accurately in the graphemic recognition task, whereas performance was generally equivalent in all three tasks for the English-speaking subjects. Alphabetic and logographic writing systems apparently activate different coding and memory mechanisms such that logographic characters produce significantly more visual information in memory, whereas alphabetic words result in a more integrated code involving visual, phonological, and semantic information.


  1. Biederman, I., &Tsao, Y. C. On processing Chinese ideographs and English words: Some implications from Stroop-test results.Cognitive Psychology, 1979,11, 125–132.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Chapman, T. L.Roget’s international thesaurus (4th ed.). New York: Crowell, 1977.Google Scholar
  3. Davelaar, E., Coltheart, M., Besner, D., &Jonasson, J. T. Phonological recoding and lexical access.Memory & Cognition, 1978,6, 391–402.Google Scholar
  4. Gibson, E. J., &Levin, H.The psychology of reading. Cambridge, Mass: M.I.T. Press, 1975.Google Scholar
  5. Haber, R. N. How we remember what we see.Scientific American, 1970,222, 104–112.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Hatta, T. Recognition of Japanese Kanji in the left and right visual field.Neuropsychologia, 1977,15, 685–688.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Hung, D. L., & Tzeng, O. J. L. Orthographic variations and visual information processing.Psychological Bulletin, in press.Google Scholar
  8. Juola, J. F., Fischler, I., Wood, C. T., &Atkinson, R. C. Recognition time for information stored in long-term memory.Perception & Psychophysics, 1971,10, 8–14.Google Scholar
  9. Kučera, H., &Francis, W. H.Computational analysis of present-day American English. Providence, R.I: Brown University Press, 1967.Google Scholar
  10. Makita, K. The rarity of reading disability in Japanese children.American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 1968,38, 599–614.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Meyer, D. E., Schvaneveldt, R. W., &Ruddy, M. G. Functions of graphemic and phonemic codes in visual word-recognition.Memory & Cognition, 1974,2, 309–321.Google Scholar
  12. National Institute for Compilation and Translation.A study on the high frequency words used in Chinese elementary school reading materials. Taipei: Chung Hwa, 1967.Google Scholar
  13. Pabk, S., &Arbuckle, T. Y. Ideograms versus alphabets: Effects of scripts on memory in (“biscriptual”) Korean subjects.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 1977,3, 631–642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Sasanuma, S. Kana and Kanji processing in Japanese aphasics.Brain and Language, 1975,2, 369–383.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Sasanuma, S., Itoh, M., Kobayashi, Y., &Mori, K. The nature of the task-stimulus interaction in the tachistoscopic recognition of Kana and Kanji words.Brain and Language, 1980,9, 298–306.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Sasanuma, S., Itoh, M., Mori, K., &Kobayashi, Y. Tachisto-scopic recognition of Kana and Kanji words.Neuropsychologia, 1977,15, 547–553.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Shepard, R. N. Recognition memory for words, sentences, and pictures.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1967,6, 156–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Standing, L. Learning 10,000 pictures.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1973, 25, 207–222.Google Scholar
  19. Tarnopol, L., &Tarnopol, M. Reading and learning problems worldwide. In L. Tarnopol & M. Tarnopol (Eds.),Reading dïsabilities: An international perspective. Baltimore, Md: University Park Press, 1976.Google Scholar
  20. Turnage, T. W., &Mcginnies, E. A cross-cultural comparison of the effects of presentation mode and meaningfulness in short-term recall.American Journal of Psychology, 1973,86, 869–881.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Tzeng, O. J. L., &Hung, D. L. Reading in a nonalphabetic writing system: Some experimental studies. In J. F. Kavanagh & R. L. Venezky (Eds.),Orthography, reading and dyslexia. Baltimore, Md: University Park Press, 1980.Google Scholar
  22. Vanderplas, J. M., &Garvin, E. A. The association value of random shapes.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1959,57, 147–154.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Vik, G. H. Reading disabilities in Norwegian elementary grades. In L. Tarnopol & M. Tarnopol (Eds.),Reading disabilities: An international perspective. Baltimore, Md: University Park Press, 1976.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Psychonomic Society, Inc 1982

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hsuan-Chih Chen
    • 1
  • James F. Juola
    • 1
  1. 1.Departmerit of PsychologyUniversity of KansasLawrence

Personalised recommendations