Memory & Cognition

, Volume 5, Issue 3, pp 335–339 | Cite as

Semantic facilitation without association in a lexical decision task

  • Ira Fischler
Article

Abstract

Subjects were shown pairs of letter strings and had to decide as quickly as possible whether both strings were words. The word pairs included associates (e.g., cat-dog), words not normatively associated that had been rated by other subjects as semantically similar (e.g., nurse-wife), and unrelated control pairs (e.g., bread-stem). Both associates and semantically related pairs were responded to more quickly than were the corresponding control pairs. The magnitude of the facilitation for the associates appeared to be related more to the semantic similarity ratings than to measures of either direct or indirect associative strength. It was concluded that the encoding of a word can be facilitated by the prior processing of a semantically related word.

Reference Notes

  1. 1.
    Meyer, D. E., Schvaneveldt, R. W., & Ruddy, M. G.Activation of lexical memory. Paper presented at the meeting of the Psychonomic Society, St. Louis, Missouri, November 1972.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Fischler, I.Latency of associative facilitation in a lexical decision task. Unpublished manuscript, 1975. (Available from Ira Fischler, Psychology Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611.)Google Scholar

References

  1. Anderson, J. R.Language, memory, and thought. Hillsdale, N.J: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1976.Google Scholar
  2. Anisfeld, M., &Knapp, M. Association, synonymity, and directionality in false recognition.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1968,77, 171–179.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Clark, H. H. Word associations and linguistic theory. In J. Lyons (Ed.),New horizons in linguistics. Baltimore, Md: Penguin, 1970.Google Scholar
  4. Clark, H. H. The language-as-fixed-effect fallacy: A critique of language statistics in psychological research.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1973,12, 335–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Collins, A. M., &Loftus, E. F. A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing.Psychological Review, 1975,82, 407–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Conrad, C. Cognitive economy in semantic memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1972,92, 149–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cramer, P. The determinants of mediated priming: Time interval, semantic and associative relationships.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1969,8, 266–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Elias, C. S., &Perfetti, C. A. Encoding task and recognition memory: The importance of semantic encoding.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1973,99, 151–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Esper, E. A.Analogy and association in linguistics and psychology. Athens, Ga: University of Georgia Press, 1973.Google Scholar
  10. Fillenbaum, S. Words as feature complexes: False recognition of antonyms and synonyms.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1969,82, 400–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fischler, I. Expectancy and associative facilitation in a lexical decision task.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1977,3, 18–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fodor, J. A., Bever, T. G., &Garrett, M. F.The psychology of language.. An introduction to psycholinguistics and generative grammar. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1974.Google Scholar
  13. Grossman, L., &Eagle, M. Synonymity, antonymity, and association in false recognition responses.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1970,83, 244–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Jenkins, P. M., &Cofer, C. N. An exploratory study of discrete free association in compound verbal stimuli.Psychological Reports, 1957,3, 599–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Katz, J. J., &Fodor, J. A. The structure of a semantic theory.Language, 1963,39, 170–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kucera, H., &Francis, W. N.Computational analysis of present day American English. Providence, R.I: Brown University Press, 1967.Google Scholar
  17. LaBerge, D. Perceptual learning and attention. In W. K Estes (Ed.),Handbook of learning and cognitive processes: Attention and memory (Vol. 4). Hillsdale, N.J: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1976.Google Scholar
  18. Landauer, T. K., &Meyer, D. E. Category size and semantic memory retrieval.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1972,11, 539–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Meyer, D. E., &Schvaneveldt, R. W. Facilitation in recognizing pairs of words: Evidence of a dependence between retrieval operations.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1971,90, 227–234.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Meyer, D. E., Schvaneveldt, R. W., &Ruddy, M. G. Loci of contextual effects in visual word recognition. In P. Rabbitt (Ed.),Attention and performance V. New York: Academic Press, 1975.Google Scholar
  21. Mueller, J. G., Yadrick, R. M., Pavur, E. J., &Adkins, C. The effects of instructions on false recognitions.American Journal of Psychology, 1975,88, 65–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Neeley, J. H. Semantic priming and retrieval from lexical memory: The roles of inhibitionless spreading activation and limited-capacity attention.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, in press.Google Scholar
  23. Paivio, A. Latency of verbal associations and imagery to noun stimuli as a function of abstractness and generality.Canadian Journal of Psychology, 1966,20, 378–387.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Posner, M. I., &Snyder, C. R. Attention and cognitive control. In R. L. Solso (Ed.),Information processing and cognition. Hillsdale, N.J: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1975. Pp. 55–85.Google Scholar
  25. Quillian, M. R. A revised design for an understanding machine.Mechanical Translation, 1962,7, 17–29.Google Scholar
  26. Rosch, E. Cognitive representations of semantic categories.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 1975,104, 192–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Smith, E. E., Shoben, E. J., &Rips, L. J. Structure and process in semantic memory: A featural model for semantic decisions.Psychological Review, 1974,81, 214–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Underwood, B. J. False recognition produced by implicit verbal responses.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1985,70, 122–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Psychonomic Society, Inc. 1977

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ira Fischler
    • 1
  1. 1.University of FloridaGainesville

Personalised recommendations