Advertisement

Memory & Cognition

, Volume 9, Issue 4, pp 422–433 | Cite as

Problem solving and the development of abstract categories in programming languages

  • Beth Adelson
Article

Abstract

The question of how novice and expert computer programmers represent and use programming concepts is addressed here. Lines of programming code forming three complete programs were presented one at a time and in random order in a multitrial free recall procedure. Qualitative and quantitative measures revealed clear but different subjective organization in the two groups. The novices used a syntax-based organization, whereas the experts used a more abstract hierarchical organization based on principles of program function.

Keywords

Free Recall Expert Group Cluster Solution Subjective Organization Syntactic Category 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Bhaskar, R., &Simon, H. A. Problem solving in semantically rich domains: An example from engineering thermodynamics.Cognitive Science, 1977,1, 193–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Chase, W. C., &Simon, H. A. Perception in chess.Cognitive Psychology, 1973,4, 55–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Craik, F. I. M., &Lockhart, R. C. Levels of processing: A framework for memory research.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1972,11, 671–684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Crowder, R. G.Principles of learning and memory. Hillsdale, N.J: Erlbaum, 1976.Google Scholar
  5. De Groot, A. D.Thought and choice in chess. The Hague: Mouton, 1965.Google Scholar
  6. Egan, D. E., &Schwartz, B. J. Chunking in recall of symbolic drawings.Memory & Cognition, 1979,7, 149–158.Google Scholar
  7. Friendly, M. L. In search of the M-gram: The structure of organization in free recall.Cognitive Psychology, 1977,9, 188–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kruskal, J. B. The relationship between multi-dimensional scaling and clustering. In Van Ryzin (Ed.),Classification and clustering. New York: Academic Press, 1977.Google Scholar
  9. Kruskal, J. B., &Wish, M.Multidimensional scaling. Beverly Hills, Calif: Sage, 1978.Google Scholar
  10. Reitman, J. S. Skilled perception in go: Deducing memory structures from inter-response times.Cognitive Psychology, 1976,8, 336–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Reitman, J. S., &Rueter, H. Organization revealed by recall orders and confirmed by pauses.Cognitive Psychology, 1980,12, 559–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Rosch, E., &Mervis, C. B. Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categories.Cognitive Psychology, 1975,7, 573–605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Rosch, E., Mervis, C. B., Gray, W. D., Johnson, D. M., &Boyes-Braem, P. Basic objects in natural categories.Cognitive Psychology, 1976,8, 382–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Shneiderman, B. Exploratory experiments in programmer behavior.International Journal of Computer and Information Sciences, 1976,5, 123–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Simon, D. P., &Simon, H. A. Individual differences in solving physics problems. In R. S. Siegler (Ed.),Children’s thinking: What develops? Hillsdale, N.J: Erlbaum, 1978.Google Scholar
  16. Simon, H. A. Information processing models of cognition.Annual Review of Psychology, 1979,30, 383–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Sternberg, R. J., &Tulving, E. The measurement of subjective organization in free recall.Psychological Bulletin, 1977,84, 539–556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Tulving, E. Subjective organization in the free recall of “unrelated” words.Psychological Review, 1962,69, 344–354.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Wolfe, J. M. An interim validity report on the Wolfe Programming Aptitude Test.Computer Personnel, 1977,6, 1–2.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Psychonomic Society, Inc. 1981

Authors and Affiliations

  • Beth Adelson
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Psychology and Social RelationsHarvard UniversityCambridge

Personalised recommendations