Memory & Cognition

, Volume 18, Issue 4, pp 367–379 | Cite as

Event-related brain potentials dissociate repetition effects of high-and low-frequency words

  • Michael D. Rugg


Event-related brain potentials (ERPs) were recorded while subjects detected nonwords interspersed among sequences of words of high or low frequency of occurrence. In Phase 1, a proportion of the words were repeated after six intervening items. In Phase 2, which followed after a break of approximately 15 min, the words were either repeats of items presented in the previous phase or new. Unrepeated low-frequency words evoked larger N400 components than did high-frequency items. In Phase 1, this effect interacted with repetition, suchthatnofreqiiency effects were observed on N400s evoked by repeated words. In addition, the post-500-msec latency region of the ERPs exhibited a substantial repetition effect for low-frequency words, but did not differentiate unrepeated and repeated high-frequency words. In Phase 2, ERPs evoked by “old” and “new” high-frequency words did not differ in any latency region, while those evoked by old and new low-frequency words differed only after 500 msec. The interactive effects of frequency and repetition suggest that these variables act jointly at multiple loci during the processing of a word. The specificity of the post-500-msec repetition effect for low-frequency words may reflect a process responsive to a discrepancy between words’ intra and extraexperimental familiarity.


  1. Balota, D. A., &Chumbley, J. I. (1984). Are lexical decisions a good measure of lexical access? The role of word frequency in the neglected decision stage.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,10, 340–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bentin, S., Mccarthy, G., &Wood, C. C. (1985). Event-related potentials, lexical decision and semantic priming.Electroencephalography & Clinical Neurophysiology,60, 343–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bentin, S., &Moscovitch, M. (1988). The time course of repetition effects for words and unfamiliar faces.Journal of Experimental Psy-chology: General,117, 148–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Besson, M., Kutas, M., & Van Petten, C. (1989, May).Semantic priming and word repetition effects in sentence context: An event-related potentials study. Poster presented at the Ninth International Conference on Event-Related Potentials of the Brain, Noordwijk, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  5. Coles, M. G. H., Gratton, G., Bashore, T. R., Eriksen, C. W., &Donchin, E. (1985). A psychophysiological investigation of the continuous flow model of human information processing.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception& Performance,11, 529–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Duchek, J. M., &Neely, J. H. (1989). A dissociative word-frequency x levels-of-processing interaction in episodicrecognition and lexical decision tasks.Memory & Cognition,17, 148–162.Google Scholar
  7. Feustel, T. C, Shiffrin, R. M., &Salasoo, A. (1983). Episodic and lexical contributionsto therepetition effect in word identification.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,112, 309–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Forster, K. I. (1976). Accessing the mental lexicon. In R. J. Wales & E. Walker (Eds.),New approaches to language mechanisms (pp. 257–287). Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
  9. Forster, K. I. (1981). Priming and the effects of sentence and lexical contexts on naming time: Evidence for autonomous lexical processing.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,33A, 465–495.Google Scholar
  10. Forster, K. I., &Davis, C. (1984). Repetition priming and frequency attenuation in lexicalaccess.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory , & Cognition,10, 680–698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gernsbacher, M. A. (1984). Resolving 20 years of inconsistent interactions between lexical familiarity and orthography, concreteness and polysemy.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,113, 256–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Glanzer, M., &Bowles, N. (1976). Analysis of the word frequency effect in recognition memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory,2, 21–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gordon, B. (1983). Lexical access and lexical decision: Mechanisms of frequency sensitivity.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,22, 24–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gordon, B. (1985). Subjective frequency and the lexical decision latency function: Implications for mechanisms of lexical access.Journal of Memory & Language,24, 631–645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gorman, A. M. (1961). Recognition memory for nouns as a function of abstractness and frequency.Journal of Experimental Psychology,61, 23–29.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Halgren, E., &Smith, M. E. (1987). Cognitive evoked potentials as modulatory processesin human memory formation and retrieval.Human Neurobiology,6, 129–139.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Hillyard, S. A., &.Kutas, M. (1983). Electrophysiology of cognitive processing.Annual Review of Psychology,34, 33–61.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. HiNtzman, D.L. (1988). Judgments of frequency and recognition memory in a multiple-trace memory model.Psychological Review,95, 528–551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Humphreys, G.W., Besner, D., &Quinlan, P. T. (1988). Event-perception and the word recognition effect.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,117, 51–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jacoby, L. L. (1978). On interpreting the effects of repetition: Solving a problem versus remembering a solution.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,17, 649–667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jacoby, L. L. (1983). Perceptual enhancement:Persistent effects of an experience.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,9, 21–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jacoby, L. L., &Dallas, M. (1981). On the relationship between autobiographical memory and perceptuallearning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,110,306–3400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jasper, H. (1958). The ten twenty system of the International Federation.Electroencephalography & Clinical Neurophysiology,10, 371–375.Google Scholar
  24. Karis, D., Fabiani, M., &Donchin, E. (1984). “P300” and memory; Individual differences in the von Restorff effect.Cognitive Psychology,16, 177–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Keselman, H. J., &Rogan, J. C. (1980). Repeated measuresF tests and psychophysiologicalresearch: Controlling the numberof false positives.Psychophysiology,17, 499–503.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Kinsbourne.M., &George, J. (1974). The mechanism of the word frequency effect on recognition memory.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,13, 63–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kučera, H., &Francis, W. N. (1967).Computational analysis of present-day American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Kutas, M., &Htllyard, S. A. (1980). Reading senseless sentences: Brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity.Science,207, 202–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kutas, M., &Hillyard, S. A. (1984), Brain potentials during reading reflect word expectancy and semantic association.Nature,307, 161–163.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Kutas, M., &Van Petten, C. (1988). ERP studies of language. In P. K. Ackles, J.R. Jennings, & M. G.H. Coles (Eds.),Advances in psychophysiology (pp.139–188). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  31. Magliero, A., Bashore, T., Coles, M. G. H., &Donchin, E. (1983). On the dependence of P300 latency on stimulus evaluation processes.Psychophysiology,21, 171–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Mandler, G. (1980). Recognizing: The judgment of previous occurrence.Psychological Review,87, 252–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Mandler, G., Goodman, G. O.,&Wilkes-Gibbs, D. L. (1982). The word-frequency paradox in recognition.Memory & Cognition,10, 33–42.Google Scholar
  34. Mccann, R. S., &Besner, D. (1987). Reading pseudohomophones: Implications for models of pronunciation assembly and the locus of the word frequency effect in naming.Journal of Experimental Psychology: HumanPerception & Performance,13, 13–24,Google Scholar
  35. Mcclelland, J. L., &Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part I. An account of basic findings.Psychological Review,88, 375–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Mcclelland, J. L., &Rumelhart, D. E. (1985). Distributed memory and the representation of general and specific information.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,114, 159–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Monsell, S. (1985). Repetition and the lexicon. In A. W. Ellis (Ed.),Progress in the psychology of language (Vat. 2, pp. 147–195), London: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  38. Monsell, S., Doyle, M.C, &Haggard, P.N. (1989). Effects of frequency on visual word recognition tasks: Where are they?Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,118, 43–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Morton.J. (1969). The interaction of information in wordrecognition.Psychological Review,76, 340–354,CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Nagy, M. E., &Rucg, M. D. (1989). Modulation of ERPs by word repetition: Theeffects of inter-itemlag.Psychophysiology,26, 431–436.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Norris, D. (1984). The effects of frequency, repetition and stimulus quality in visual word recognition.Quarterly Journal of Experimen-tal Psychology,36A, 507–518.Google Scholar
  42. Picton, T. W. (1981). The use of human event-related potentials in psychology. In I. Martin & P. H. Venables (Eds.),Techniques in psychophysiology (pp. 357–395). Chichester, England: Wiley.Google Scholar
  43. Polich, J., &Donchin, E. (1988). P300 and the wordfrequency effect.Electroencephalography & Clinical Neurophysiology,70, 33–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Pritchard, W. (1981). Psychophysiology of P300.Psychological Bulletin,89, 506–540.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Rao, K. V., &Proctor, R. W. (1984). Study-phase processing and the word frequencyeffect in recognition memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,10, 386–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Ratcliff.,R., Hockley, W., &Mckoon, G. (1985). Components of activation: Repetition and priming effects in lexical decision and recognition.Journalof Experimental Psychology: General,114, 435–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Rugg, M. D. (1987). Dissociation of semantic priming, word and non-word repetition by event-related potentials.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,39A, 123–148.Google Scholar
  48. Rugg, M. D., &. Doyle, M. (1990).Event-related potentials and recognition memory for high and low frequency words. Manuscript in preparation.Google Scholar
  49. Rugg, M. D., Furda, J., &Lorist, M. (1988). The effects of task on the modulation of event-related potentials by word repetition.Psychophysiology,25, 55–63,CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Rugg, M. D., Kok, A., Barrett, G., &Fischler, I. (1986). ERPs associated with language and hemisphere specialisation. In W. C. McCallum, R. Zappoli, & F. Denoth (Eds.),Cognitive psychophysiology: Studies in ERPs (pp. 273–301). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  51. Rugg, M. D., &Nagy, M. E. (1987). Lexical contribution to nonwordrepetition effects: Evidence from event-related potentials.Memory & Cognition,15, 473–481.Google Scholar
  52. Rugg, M. D., &Nagy, M. E. (1989). Event-related potentials and recognition memory for words.Electroencephalography & Clinical Neurophysiology,72, 395–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Scarborough, D. L., Cortese, C., &Scarborough, H. J. (1977). Frequency and repetition effects in lexical memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,3, 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Seidenberg, M. S., Waters, G. S., Sanders, M., &Langer, P. (1984). Pre- and postlexical loci ofcontextual effects on word recognition.Memory & Cognition,12, 315–328.Google Scholar
  55. Smith, M. E., &Halgren, E. (1987). Event-related potentials during lexical decision: Effects of repetition, word frequency, pronounceability, and concreteness. In R. Johnson, J. W. Rohrbaugh, & R. Parasuraman (Eds.),Current trends in ERP research (pp. 417–421). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  56. Stanovich, K. E., &West, R. F. (1983). On priming by a sentence context.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,112, 1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Psychonomic Society, Inc. 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael D. Rugg
    • 1
  1. 1.Wellcome Brain Research Group, Department of PsychologyUniversity of St. AndrewsSt. AndrewsUK

Personalised recommendations