Memory & Cognition

, Volume 15, Issue 2, pp 109–118 | Cite as

Interevent differences in event memory: Why are some events more recallable than others?

  • Ronald L. Cohen
  • Michele Peterson
  • Toni Mantini-Atkinson
Article

Abstract

Interitem differences in the free recall of action events were studied in five experiments. The action events were presented in three different formats: minitasks performed by the subjects in response to verbal instructions from the experimenter (SPTs), minitasks performed by the experimenter (EPTs), and task instructions (TIs). Not only were reliable interevent differences in recall probability demonstrated within each format, but these differences tended to correlate across formats, especially between the SPTs and EPTs; thus, a highly recallable SPT also tended to be a highly recallable EPT. Attempts to explain interitem recall differences in terms of differences in familiarity, vividness, and the availability of environmental cues were largely unsuccessful. An experimental analysis of the action events into action and object components showed the recall probabilities of our events to be mainly dependent on the recall probabilities of their action components, with only a minor dependence on the recall probabilities of their object components.

References

  1. Backman, L. (1985). Further evidence for the lack of age differences on free recall of subject-performed tasks: The importance of motor action.Human Learning,4, 79–87.Google Scholar
  2. Bäckman, L., &Nilsson, L.-G. (1984). Aging effects in free recall: An exception to the rule.Human Learning,3, 53–69.Google Scholar
  3. Bäckman, L., &Nilsson, L,-G. (1985). Prerequisites for lack of age differences in memory performance.Experimental Aging Research,11, 67–83.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Cohen, R. L. (1981). On the generality of some memory laws.Scandinavian Journal of Psychology,22, 267–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cohen, R. L. (1983). The effect of encoding variables on the free recall of words and action events.Memory & Cognition,11, 575–582.Google Scholar
  6. Cohen, R. L. (1985). On the generality of laws of memory. In L.-G Nilsson & T. Archer (Eds.),Perspectives on learning and memory (pp. 247–277). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  7. Cohen, R. L., &Bean, G. (1983). Memory in educable mentally retarded adults. Deficit in subject or experimenter?Intelligence,7, 287–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cohen, R. L., &Stewart, M. (1982). How to avoid developmental effects m free recall.Scandinavian Journal of Psychology,23, 9–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Craik, F. I. M., &Tulving, E. (1975). Depth of processing and the retention of words in episodic memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General.104, 268–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Engelkamp, J., &Zimmer, H. D. (1984). Motor program information as a separable memory unit.Psychological Research,46, 283–299.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Hall, J. F. (1954). Learning as a function of word frequency.American Journal of Psychology,67, 138–140.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Paivio, A., Yuille, J. C., &Madigan, S. (1968). Concreteness, imagery, and meaningfulness values for 925 nouns.Journal of Experimental Psychology Monographs,76(1, Pt. 2).Google Scholar
  13. Paivio, A., Yuille, J. C., &Rogers, T. B. (1969). Noun imagery and meaningfulness in free and serial recall.Journal of Experimental Psychology,79, 509–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Raymond, B. (1969). Short-term storage and long-term storage in free recall.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,8, 567–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Saltz, E., &Donnenwerth-Nolan, S. (1981). Does motoric imagery facilitate memory for sentences? A selective interference test.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,20, 322–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Smith, S. M. (1979). Remembering in and out of context.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory,5, 460–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Smith, S. M. (1984). A comparison of two techniques for reducing context-dependent forgetting.Memory & Cognition,12, 477–482.Google Scholar
  18. Sumby, W. H. (1963). Word frequency and the serial position effect.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,1, 443–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Tulving, E., McNulty, J. A., &Ozier, M. (1965). Vividness of words and learning to learn in free-recall learning.Canadian Journal of Psychology,19, 242–252.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Zimmer, H. D., &Engelkamp, J. (1985). An attempt to distinguish between kinematic and motor components.Acta Psychologica,58, 81–106.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Psychonomic Society, Inc. 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ronald L. Cohen
    • 1
  • Michele Peterson
    • 1
  • Toni Mantini-Atkinson
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyGlendon CollegeTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations