Perception & Psychophysics

, Volume 66, Issue 7, pp 1171–1189 | Cite as

Attention and the subjective expansion of time

  • Peter Ulric TseEmail author
  • James Intriligator
  • Josée Rivest
  • Patrick Cavanagh


During brief, dangerous events, such as car accidents and robberies, many people report that events seem to pass in slow motion, as if time had slowed down. We have measured a similar, although less dramatic, effect in response to unexpected, nonthreatening events. We attribute the subjective expansion of time to the engagement of attention and its influence on the amount of perceptual information processed. We term the effecttime’s subjective expansion (TSE) and examine here the objective temporal dynamics of these distortions. When a series of stimuli are shown in succession, the lowprobabilityoddball stimulus in the series tends to last subjectively longer than the high-probability stimulus even when they last the same objective duration. In particular, (1) there is a latency of at least 120 msec between stimulus onset and the onset of TSE, which may be preceded by subjective temporal contraction; (2) there is a peak in TSE at which subjective time is particularly distorted at a latency of 225 msec after stimulus onset; and (3) the temporal dynamics of TSE are approximately the same in the visual and the auditory domains. Two control experiments (in which the methods of magnitude estimation and stimulus reproduction were used) replicated the temporal dynamics of TSE revealed by the method of constant stimuli, although the initial peak was not apparent with these methods. In addition, a third, control experiment (in which the method of single stimuli was used) showed that TSE in the visual domain can occur because of semantic novelty, rather than image novelty per se. Overall, the results support the view that attentional orienting underlies distortions in perceived duration.


Magnitude Estimation Time Perception Constant Stimulus Oddball Paradigm Duration Judgment 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Allan, L. G. (1977). The time-order error in judgments of duration.Canadian Journal of Psychology,31, 24–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allan, L. G. (1979). The perception of time.Perception & Psychophysics,26, 340–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Allan, L. G. (1984). Contingent aftereffects in duration judgments. In J. Gibbon & L. G. Allan (Eds.),Timing and time perception (Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, Vol. 423, pp. 116–130). New York: New York Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
  4. Allan, L. G., &Gibbon, J. (1994). A new temporal illusion or the TOE once again?Perception & Psychophysics,55, 227–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Avant, L. L., Lyman, P. J., &Antes, J. R. (1975). Effects of stimulus familiarity on judged visual duration.Perception & Psychophysics,17, 253–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Baylis, G., &Driver, J. (1995). One-sided edge assignment in vision: 1. Figure-ground segmentation and attention to objects.Current Directions in Psychological Science,4, 140–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brown, S. W. (1985). Time perception and attention: The effects of prospective versus retrospective paradigms and task demands on perceived duration.Perception & Psychophysics,38, 115–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brown, S. W. (1995). Time, change, and motion: The effects of stimulus movement on temporal perception.Perception & Psychophysics,57, 105–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cantor, N. E., &Thomas, E. A. (1977). Control of attention in the processing of temporal and spatial information in complex visual patterns.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,3, 243–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Creelman, C. D. (1962). Human discrimination of auditory stimuli.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,34, 582–593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fechner, G. T. (1860).Elemente der Psychophysik. Leipzig: Breitkopf & Härtel.Google Scholar
  12. Fechner, G. T. (1882).Revision der Hauptpunkte der Psychophysik. Leipzig: Breitkopf & Härtel.Google Scholar
  13. Festinger, L., Coren, S., &Rivers, G. (1970). The effect of attention on brightness contrast and assimilation.American Journal of Psychology,2, 126–150.Google Scholar
  14. Fraisse, P. (1963).The psychology of time. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  15. Fraisse, P. (1984). Perception and estimation of time.Annual Review of Psychology,35, 1–36.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Frankenhauser, M. (1959).Estimation of time. Uppsala, Sweden: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
  17. Garcia-Larrea, L., Lukaszewicz, A.-C., &Mauguiere, F. (1992). Revisiting the oddball paradigm: Non-target vs. neutral stimuli and the evaluation of ERP attentional effects.Neuropsychologia,30, 723–741.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Grondin, S., &Macar, F. (1992). Dividing attention between temporal and nontemporal tasks: A performance operating characteristic— POC—analysis. In F. Macar, V. Pouthas, & W. Friedman (Eds.),Time, action and cognition: Towards bridging the gap (pp. 119–128). Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  19. He, Z. J., &Nakayama, K. (1992). Surfaces versus features in visual search.Nature,359, 231–233.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hellström, Å. (1977). Time errors are perceptual.Psychological Research,39, 345–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hellström, Å. (1979). Time errors and differential sensation weighting.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,5, 460–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hellström, Å. (1985). The time-order error and its relatives: Mirrors of cognitive processes in comparing.Psychological Bulletin,97, 35–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Helson, H. (1947). Adaptation level as frame of reference for prediction of psychophysical data.American Journal of Psychology,60, 1–29.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Helson, H. (1964).Adaptation-level theory. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  25. Hicks, R. E., &Brundige, R. M. (1974). Judgments of temporal duration while processing verbal and physiognomic stimuli.Acta Psychologica,38, 447–453.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hicks, R. E., Miller, G. W., Gaes, G., &Bierman, K. (1977). Concurrent processing demands and the experience of time-in-passing.American Journal of Psychology,90, 431–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hicks, R. E., Miller, G. W., &Kinsbourne, M. (1976). Prospective and retrospective judgments of time as a function of amount of information processed.American Journal of Psychology,89, 719–730.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hikosaka, O., Miyauchi, S., &Shimojo, S. (1993). Focal visual attention produces illusory temporal order and motion sensation.Vision Research,33, 1219–1240.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hollingworth, H. L. (1910). The central tendency of judgment.Journal of Philosophy, Psychology, & Scientific Methods,7, 461–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hülser, C. (1924). Zeitauffassung und Zeitschätzung verschieden ausgefüllter Intervalle unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Aufmerksamkeitsablenkung.Archiv der Gesamten Psychologie,49, 363–378.Google Scholar
  31. Irwin, D. E., Colcombe, A. M., Kramer, A. F., &Hahn, S. (2000). Attentional and oculomotor capture by onset, luminance and color singletons.Vision Research,40, 1443–1458.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. James, W. (1950).The principles of psychology. New York: Dover. (Original work published 1890)Google Scholar
  33. Jamieson, D. G., &Petrusic, W. M. (1975). Pairing effects and time-order errors in duration discrimination.Perception & Psychophysics,18, 107–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Jonides, J., &Yantis, S. (1988). Uniqueness of abrupt visual onset in capturing attention.Perception & Psychophysics,43, 346–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kahneman, D. (1973).Attention and effort. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  36. Katz, D. (1906). Experimentelle Beiträge zur Psychologie des Vergleichs im Gebiete des Zeitsinns [Experimental contributions to the psychology of our sense of time].Zeitschrift für Psychologie, Physiologie der Sinnesorgane,42, 302–340.Google Scholar
  37. Leuba, A. (1892). A new instrument for Weber’s law; with indications of a law of sense memory.American Journal of Psychology,5, 370–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Macar, F., Grondin, S., &Casini, L. (1994). Controlled attention sharing influences time estimation.Memory & Cognition,22, 673–686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Mackeben, M., &Nakayama, K. (1993). Express attentional shifts.Vision Research,33, 85–90.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Mattes, S., &Ulrich, R. (1998). Directed attention prolongs the perceived duration of a brief stimulus.Perception & Psychophysics,60, 1305–1317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. McKee, S. P., Klein, S. A., &Teller, D. Y. (1985). Statistical properties of forced-choice psychometric functions: Implications of probit analysis.Perception & Psychophysics,37, 286–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Michon, J. A. (1978). The making of the present: A tutorial review. In J. Requin (Ed.),Attention and performance VII (pp. 89–109). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  43. Nakajima, Y., ten Hoopen, G., Hilkhuysen, G., &Sasaki, T. (1992). Time-shrinking: A discontinuity in the perception of auditory temporal patterns.Perception & Psychophysics,51, 504–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Nakajima, Y., ten Hoopen, G., &van der Wilk, R. G. H. (1991). A new illusion of time perception.Music Perception,8, 431–448.Google Scholar
  45. Nakayama, K., &Mackeben, M. (1989). Sustained and transient components of focal visual attention.Vision Research,29, 1631–1647.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Ornstein, R. E. (1969).On the experience of time. Baltimore: Penguin.Google Scholar
  47. Petrusic, W. M. (1984). Explicit counting and time-order errors in duration discrimination. In J. Gibbon & L. Allan (Eds.),Timing and time perception (Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, Vol. 423, pp. 630–633). New York: New York Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
  48. Polich, J. (1986). Attention, probability, and task demands as determinants of P300 latency from auditory stimuli.Electroencephalography & Clinical Neurophysiology,63, 251–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Potts, G. F., Liotti, M., Tucker, D. M., &Posner, M. I. (1996). Frontal and inferior temporal cortical activity in visual target detection: Evidence from high spatially sampled event-related potentials.Brain Topography,9, 3–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Pratt, C. C. (1933). Time-errors in the method of single stimuli.Journal of Experimental Psychology,16, 798–814.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Predebon, J. (1996). The relationship between the number of presented stimuli and prospective duration estimates: The effect of concurrent task activity.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,3, 376–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Quasebarth, K. (1924). Zeitschätzung und Zeitauffassung optisch und akustisch ausgefüllter Intervalle.Archiv der Gesamten Psychologie,49, 379–432.Google Scholar
  53. Remington, R. W., Johnston, J. C., &Yantis, S. (1992). Involuntary attentional capture by abrupt onsets.Perception & Psychophysics,51, 279–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Rensink, R. A., &Enns, J. T. (1995). Preemption effects in visual search: Evidence for low-level grouping.Psychological Review,102, 101–130.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Rose, D., &Summers, J. (1995). Duration illusions in a train of visual stimuli.Perception,24, 1177–1187.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Schab, F. R., &Crowder, R. G. (1988). The role of succession in temporal cognition: Is the time-order error a recency effect of memory?Perception & Psychophysics,44, 233–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Schiffman, H. R., &Bobko, D. J. (1974). Effects of stimulus complexity on the perception of brief temporal intervals.Journal of Experimental Psychology,103, 156–159.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Shiu, L.-P., &Pashler, H. (1995). Spatial attention and vernier acuity.Vision Research,35, 337–343.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Stelmach, L. B., Herdman, C. M., &McNeil, K. R. (1994). Attentional modulation of visual processes in motion perception.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,20, 108–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Thomas, E. A. C., &Brown, T. I., Jr. (1974). Time perception and the filled-duration illusion.Perception & Psychophysics,16, 449–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Thomas, E. A. C., &Cantor, N. E. (1978). Interdependence between the processing of temporal and non-temporal information. In J. Requin (Ed.),Attention and performance VII (pp. 43–62). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  62. Thomas, E. A. C., &Weaver, W. B. (1975). Cognitive processing and time perception.Perception & Psychophysics,17, 363–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Treisman, M. (1963). Temporal discrimination and the indifference interval: Implications for a model of the “internal clock”.Psychological Monographs,77, 1–31.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Tse, P. U., Sheinberg, D. L., &Logothetis, N. K. (2003). Attentional enhancement opposite a peripheral flash revealed using change blindness.Psychological Science,14, 91–99.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Underwood, G., &Swain, R. A. (1973). Selectivity of attention and the perception of duration.Perception,2, 101–105.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Vierordt, K. von (1868).Der Zeitsinn nach Versuchen. Tübingen: Laupp.Google Scholar
  67. Weinberg, L. (1991–1995).Poser [Computer software]. Fractal Design Corp.Google Scholar
  68. Woodrow, H. (1930). The reproduction of temporal intervals.Journal of Experimental Psychology,13, 473–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Woodrow, H. (1951). Time perception. In S. S. Stevens (Ed.),Handbook of experimental psychology (pp. 1224–1236). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  70. Yantis, S., &Egeth, H. E. (1999). On the distinction between visual salience and stimulus-driven attentional capture.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,25, 661–676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Yantis, S., &Jonides, J. (1990). Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: Voluntary versus automatic allocation.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,16, 121–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Zakay, D. (1993). Time estimation methods: Do they influence prospective duration estimates?Perception,22, 91–101.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Zakay, D., &Tsal, Y. (1989). Awareness of attention allocation and time estimation accuracy.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,27, 209–210.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Psychonomic Society, Inc. 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peter Ulric Tse
    • 4
    Email author
  • James Intriligator
    • 1
  • Josée Rivest
    • 2
  • Patrick Cavanagh
    • 3
  1. 1.University of WalesBangorWales
  2. 2.York UniversityTorontoCanada
  3. 3.Harvard UniversityCambridge
  4. 4.Department of Psychological and Brain SciencesDartmouth CollegeHanover

Personalised recommendations