The category inclusion rule specifies that categories inherit the properties of their superordinates. For example, given thatall metals are pentavalent, it can be concluded thatall iron is pentavalent. Sloman (1998) showed that people do not fully endorse conclusions that follow from the category inclusion rule. He claims that people rely on the similarity between the premise and the conclusion categories (metals andiron), rather than applying the category inclusion rule. By allowing reasoners to rate their certainty for category relations (e.g.,iron is metal), as well as for conclusions, the present study shows that similarity has only an indirect effect on the certainty of conclusions: Reasoners are more certain that similar categories have a category inclusion relation, and this in turn affects the certainty of conclusions based on this relation.
Conditional Probability Natural Kind Similar Item Probability Rating Categorical Inference
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Areni, C. S. (2002). The proposition-probability model of argument structure and message acceptance.Journal of Consumer Research,29, 168–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baron, R. M., &Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations.Journal of Personality & Social Psychology,51, 1173–1182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braine, M. D. S., &O’Brien, D. P. (1998).Mental logic. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar