The role of guessing and boundaries on date estimation biases
This study investigates the causes of event-dating biases. Two hundred participants provided knowledge ratings and date estimates for 64 news events. Four independent groups dated the same events under different boundary constraints. Analysis across all responses showed that forward telescoping decreased with boundary age, concurring with the boundary-effects model. With guesses removed from the data set, backward telescoping was greatly reduced, but forward telescoping was unaffected by boundaries. This dissociation indicates that multiple factors (e.g., guessing and reconstructive strategies) are responsible for different dating biases and argue against a boundary explanation of forward telescoping.
- Baddeley, A., Lewis, V., &Nimmo-Smith, I. (1978). When did you last … ? In M. Gruneberg, P. Morris, & R. Sykes (Eds.),Practical aspects of memory (pp. 77–83). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Brown, N. R. (2002). Real-world estimation: Estimation modes and seeding effects.Psychology of Learning & Motivation,41, 321–359.Google Scholar
- Goldstein, D. G., &Gigerenzer, G. (1999). The recognition heuristic: How ignorance makes us smart. In G. Gigerenzer & P. Todd (Eds.),Simple heuristics that make us smart (pp. 37–57). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Schwarz, N. (1996).Cognition and communication: Judgmental biases, research methods and the logic of conversation. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Siegler, R. S. (1987b). Strategy choices in subtraction. In J. A. Sloboda & John D. Rogers (Eds.),Cognitive processes in mathematics: Seminar proceedings (Keele Cognition Seminars Vol. 1, pp. 81–106). Oxford: Oxford University Press, Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
- Thompson, C. P., Skowronski, J. J., Larsen, S. F., &Betz, A. (Eds.) (1996).Autobiographical memory: Remembering what and remembering when. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar