Psychonomic Bulletin & Review

, Volume 11, Issue 4, pp 748–754 | Cite as

The role of guessing and boundaries on date estimation biases

Brief Reports

Abstract

This study investigates the causes of event-dating biases. Two hundred participants provided knowledge ratings and date estimates for 64 news events. Four independent groups dated the same events under different boundary constraints. Analysis across all responses showed that forward telescoping decreased with boundary age, concurring with the boundary-effects model. With guesses removed from the data set, backward telescoping was greatly reduced, but forward telescoping was unaffected by boundaries. This dissociation indicates that multiple factors (e.g., guessing and reconstructive strategies) are responsible for different dating biases and argue against a boundary explanation of forward telescoping.

References

  1. Baddeley, A., Lewis, V., &Nimmo-Smith, I. (1978). When did you last … ? In M. Gruneberg, P. Morris, & R. Sykes (Eds.),Practical aspects of memory (pp. 77–83). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  2. Blair, E., &Burton, S. (1987). Cognitive processes used by survey respondents to answer behavioral frequency questions.Journal of Consumer Research,14, 280–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brown, N. R. (1990). Organization of public events in long-term memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,119, 297–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brown, N. R. (1995). Estimation strategies and the judgment of event frequency.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,21, 1539–1553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brown, N. R. (2002). Real-world estimation: Estimation modes and seeding effects.Psychology of Learning & Motivation,41, 321–359.Google Scholar
  6. Brown, N. R., Rips, L. J., &Shevell, S. K. (1985). The subjective dates of natural events in very-long-term memory.Cognitive Psychology,17, 139–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brown, N. R., &Sinclair, R. C. (1999). Estimating number of lifetime sexual partners: Men and women do it differently.Journal of Sex Research,36, 292–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Burt, C. D. B. (1992). Retrieval characteristics of autobiographical memories: Event and date information.Applied Cognitive Psychology,6, 389–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Burt, C. D. B., Kemp, S., &Conway, M. (2001). What happens if you retest autobiographical memory 10 years on?Memory & Cognition,29, 127–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Crawley, S. E., &Pring, L. (2000). When did Mrs. Thatcher resign? The effects of aging on the dating of public events.Memory,8, 111–121.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ferguson, R. P., &Martin, P. (1983). Long-term temporal estimation in humans.Perception & Psychophysics,33, 585–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Friedman, W. J. (1993). Memory for the time of past events.Psychological Bulletin,35, 1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gentner, D., &Collins, A. (1981). Studies of inference from lack of knowledge.Memory & Cognition,9, 434–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Goldstein, D. G., &Gigerenzer, G. (1999). The recognition heuristic: How ignorance makes us smart. In G. Gigerenzer & P. Todd (Eds.),Simple heuristics that make us smart (pp. 37–57). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Huttenlocher, J., Hedges, L. V., &Duncan, S. (1991). Categories and particulars: Prototype effects in estimating spatial location.Psychological Review,98, 352–376.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Huttenlocher, J., Hedges, L. V., &Prohaska, V. (1988). Hierarchical organization in ordered domains: Estimating the dates of events.Psychological Review,95, 471–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kemp, S. (1993). Bias in dating news and historical events.Acta Psychologica,86, 69–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kemp, S. (1999). An associative theory of estimating past dates and past prices.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,6, 41–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Larsen, S. F., Thompson, C. P., &Hansen, T. (1996): Time in autobiographical memory. In D. C. Rubin (Ed.),Remembering our past: Studies in autobiographical memory (pp. 129–156). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lieury, A., Caplain, P., Jacquet, A., &Jolivet, C. (1979). The contraction of time in dating old events.L’Année Psychologique,79, 7–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Rubin, D. C., &Baddeley, A. D. (1989). Telescoping is not time compression: A model of the dating of autobiographical events.Memory & Cognition,17, 653–661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Schwarz, N. (1996).Cognition and communication: Judgmental biases, research methods and the logic of conversation. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  23. Siegler, R. S. (1987a). The perils of averaging data over strategies: An example from children’s addition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,116, 250–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Siegler, R. S. (1987b). Strategy choices in subtraction. In J. A. Sloboda & John D. Rogers (Eds.),Cognitive processes in mathematics: Seminar proceedings (Keele Cognition Seminars Vol. 1, pp. 81–106). Oxford: Oxford University Press, Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  25. Thompson, C. P. (1982). Memory for unique personal events: The roommate study.Memory & Cognition,10, 324–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Thompson, C. P., Skowronski, J. J., &Betz, A. (1993). The use of partial temporal information in dating personal events.Memory & Cognition,21, 352–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Thompson, C. P., Skowronski, J. J., Larsen, S. F., &Betz, A. (Eds.) (1996).Autobiographical memory: Remembering what and remembering when. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  28. Thompson, C. P., Skowronski, J. J., &Lee, D. J. (1988). Telescoping in dating naturally occurring events.Memory & Cognition,16, 461–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Psychonomic Society, Inc. 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of AlbertaEdmontonCanada

Personalised recommendations