Psychonomic Bulletin & Review

, Volume 11, Issue 2, pp 338–342 | Cite as

Spelling and dialect: Comparisons between speakers of African American vernacular English and White speakers

Brief Reports


One characteristic of African American vernacular English (AAVE) is final obstruent devoicing, where the final consonant of a word likerigid is pronounced more like /t/ than /d/. To determine whether this dialect characteristic influences adults’ spelling, African American and White college students spelled words such asrigid andballot, pronounced by either a speaker of their own dialect or a speaker of the other dialect. African Americans, especially those who often devoiced final /d/, were more likely than Whites to confused andt. Both African American and White spellers made mored/t confusions when the words were spoken by an African American experimenter than by a White experimenter. Thus, the different phonological systems of AAVE and White speakers can cause them to make different types of spelling errors. Discussions of AAVE and literacy have focused on its syntax, but its phonology must also be considered.


  1. Bailey, G., &Thomas, E. (1998). Some aspects of African American vernacular English phonology. In S. S. Mufwene, J. R. Rickford, G. Bailey, & J. Baugh (Eds.),African-American English: Structure, history, and use (pp. 85–109). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Burt, J. S., &Fury, M. B. (2000). Spelling in adults: The role of reading skills and experience.Reading & Writing,13, 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Frith, U. (1985). Beneath the surface of developmental dyslexia. In K. E. Patterson, J. C. Marshall, & M. Coltheart (Eds.),Surface dyslexia: Neuropsychological and cognitive studies of phonological reading (pp. 301–330). Hove, U.K.: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  4. Groff, P. (1978). Children’s spelling of features of Black English.Research in the Teaching of English,12, 21–28.Google Scholar
  5. Labov, W. (1995). Can reading failure be reversed? A linguistic approach to the question. In V. Gadsden & D. Wagner (Eds.),Literacy among African-American youth (pp. 39–68). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton.Google Scholar
  6. National Center for Education Statistics (2002).The condition of education 2002. Retrieved September 30, 2002 from Scholar
  7. Pennington, B. F., Lefly, D. L., Van Orden, G. C., Bookman, M. O., &Smith, S. D. (1987). Is phonology bypassed in normal or dyslexic development?Annals of Dyslexia,37, 62–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Read, C. (1975).Children’s categorization of speech sounds in English (NCTE Research Report No. 17). Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.Google Scholar
  9. Read, C. (1986).Children’s creative spelling. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  10. Treiman, R. (1993).Beginning to spell: A study of first-grade children. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Treiman, R., &Barry, C. (2000). Dialect and authography: Some differences between American and British spellers.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,26, 1423–1430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Treiman, R., Cassar, M., &Zukowski, A. (1994). What types of linguistic information do children use in spelling? The case of flaps.Child Development,65, 1310–1329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Treiman, R., Goswami, U., Tincoff, R., &Leevers, H. (1997). Effects of dialect on American and British children’s spelling.Child Development,68, 229–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Treiman, R., Kessler, B., &Bick, S. (2002). Context sensitivity in the spelling of English vowels.Journal of Memory & Language,47, 448–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Trowbridge, G. (2002, January 14). Racial divide widest in U.S.Detroit News. Retrieved September 4, 2002, from Scholar
  16. Upton, J. (2002, January 21). Segregated schools hurt students’ bid for success.Detroit News. Retrieved September 4, 2002, from Scholar
  17. Zeno, S. M., Ivenz, S. H., Millard, R. T., &Duvvuri, R. (1995).Educator’s word frequency guide. Brewster, NY: Touchstone Applied Science Associates.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Psychonomic Society, Inc. 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyWashington UniversitySt. Louis

Personalised recommendations