Psychonomic Bulletin & Review

, Volume 8, Issue 2, pp 365–371 | Cite as

Social contagion of memory

  • Henry L. Roediger
  • Michelle L. Meade
  • Erik T. Bergman
Brief Reports


We report a new paradigm for studying false memories implanted by social influence, a process we call the social contagion of memory. A subject and confederate together saw six common household scenes (e.g., a kitchen) containing many objects, for either 15 or 60 sec. During a collaborative recall test, the 2 subjects each recalled six items from the scenes, but the confederate occasionally made mistakes by reporting items not from the scene. Some intrusions were highly consistent with the scene schema (e.g., a toaster) while others were less so (e.g., oven mitts). After a brief delay, the individual subject tried to recall as many items as possible from the six scenes. Recall of the erroneous items suggested by the confederate was greater than in a control condition (with no suggestion). Further, this social contagion effect was greater when the scenes were presented for less time (15 sec) and when the intruded item was more schema consistent (e.g., the toaster). As with other forms of social influence, false memories are contagious; one person’s memory can be infected by another person’s errors.


  1. Asch, S. E. (1952).Social psychology. New York: Prentice-Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Asch, S. E. (1956). Studies of independence and conformity: A minority of one against a unanimous majority.Psychological Monographs, 70 (Whole No. 416).Google Scholar
  3. Bartlett, F.C. (1932).Remembering: A study in experimental and social psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Basden, B. H., Basden, D. R., Bryner, S., &Thomas, R. L., III (1997). A comparison of group and individual remembering: Does collaboration disrupt retrieval strategies?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,23, 1176–1191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Basden, D.R., Reysen, M., & Basden, B. H. (1998, November). False memory in perceived groups. Poster presented at the 39th annual meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Dallas.Google Scholar
  6. Betz, A. L., Skowronski, J. J., &Ostrom, T.M. (1996). Shared realities: Social influence and stimulus memory.Social Cognition,14, 113–140.Google Scholar
  7. Binet, A. (1900).La suggestibilité. Paris: Schleicher Frères.Google Scholar
  8. Bond, R., &Smith, P. (1996). Culture and conformity: A meta-analysis of studies using Asch’s (1952b, 1956) line judgment task.Psychological Bulletin,119, 111–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brewer, W. F., &Treyens, J. C. (1981). Role of schemata in memory for places.Cognitive Psychology,13, 207–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dodd, D.H., &Bradshaw, J.M. (1980). Leading questions and memory: Pragmatic constraints.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,19, 695–704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gardiner, J. M. (1988). Functional aspects of recollective experience.Memory & Cognition,16, 309–313.Google Scholar
  12. Jacoby, L. L, Hessels, S., &Bopp, K. (2001). Proactive and retroactive effects in memory performance. In H. L. Roediger III, J. S. Nairne, I. Neath, & A.M. Surprenant (Eds.),The nature of remembering: Essays in honor of Robert G. Crowder (pp. 35–54). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Jacoby, L. L., Kelley, C. M., &Dywan, J. (1989). Memory attributions. In H. L. Roediger III, & F. I. M. Craik (Eds.),Varieties of memory and consciousness: Essays in honour of Endel Tulving (pp. 391–422). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  14. Jacoby, L. L., Yonelinas, A. P., &Jennings, J. M. (1997). The relation between conscious and unconscious (automatic) influences: A declaration of independence. In J. D. Cohen & J. W. Schooler (Eds.),Scientific approaches to consciousness (pp. 13–47). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  15. Johnson, M. K., Hashtroudi, S., &Lindsay, D. S. (1993). Source monitoring.Psychological Bulletin, 114, 3–28.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Johnson, M. K., &Raye, C. L. (1998). False memories and confabulation.Trends in Cognitive Sciences,2, 137–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lindsay, D. S., &Johnson, M. K. (1989). The eyewitness suggestibility effect and memory for source.Memory & Cognition,17, 349–358.Google Scholar
  18. Loftus, E. F. (1979). Reactions to blatantly contradictory information.Memory & Cognition,7, 368–374.Google Scholar
  19. Loftus, E. F. (1993). Made in memory: Distortions in memory after misleading communications. In D. L. Medin (Ed.),The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 30, pp. 187–215). San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  20. Loftus, E. F., Miller, D. G., &Burns, H. J. (1978). Semantic integration of verbal information into visual memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory,4, 19–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Loftus, E. F., &Palmer, J. C. (1974). Reconstruction of automobile destruction: An example of the interaction between language and memory.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,13, 585–589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mack, J. E. (1994).Alien abduction: Human encounters with aliens. New York: Scribner’s.Google Scholar
  23. McDermott, K. B., & Watson, J. M. (in press). The rise and fall of false recall: The impact of presentation duration. Journal of Memory & Language.Google Scholar
  24. Meade, M. L., & Roediger, H. L., III (2000).Explorations in the social contagion of memory. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
  25. Melton, A. W., &Irwin, J. M. (1940). The influence of interpolated learning on retroactive inhibition and the overt transfer of specific responses.American Journal of Psychology,53, 175–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Miller, M. B., &Gazzaniga, M. S. (1998). Creating false memories for visual scenes.Neuropsychologia,36, 513–520.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Multhaup, K. S. (1995). Aging, source, and decision criteria: When false fame errors do and do not occur.Psychology & Aging,10, 492–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ofshe, R., &Watters, E. (1994).Making monsters: False memories, psychotherapy, and sexual hysteria. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons/Macmillan.Google Scholar
  29. Pendergrast, M. (1996).Victims of memory: Sex abuse accusations and shattered lives. Hinesburg, VT: Upper Access.Google Scholar
  30. Rajaram, S. (1993). Remembering and knowing: Two means of access to the personal past.Memory & Cognition,21, 89–102.Google Scholar
  31. Roediger, H. L., III,Jacoby, D., &McDermott, K. B. (1996). Misinformation effects in recall: Creating false memories through repeated retrieval.Journal of Memory & Language,35, 300–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Roediger, H. L., III, &McDermott, K. B. (1995). Creating false memories: Remembering words not presented in lists.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,21, 803–814.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Schneider, D. M., &Watkins, M. J. (1996). Response conformity in recognition testing.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,3, 481–485.Google Scholar
  34. Smith, V. L., &Ellsworth, P. C. (1987). The social psychology of eyewitness accuracy: Misleading questions and communicator expertise.Journal of Applied Psychology,72, 294–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Tulving, E. (1985). Memory and consciousness.Canadian Psychologist,26, 1–12.Google Scholar
  36. Underwood, J., &Pezdek, K. (1998). Memory suggestibility as an example of the sleeper effect.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,5, 449–453.Google Scholar
  37. Weldon, M. S. (2000). Remembering as a social process. In D. L. Medin (Ed.),The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 40, pp. 67–120). San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  38. Weldon, M. S., &Bellinger, K. D. (1997). Collective memory: Collaborative and individual processes in remembering.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,23, 1160–1175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Weldon, M. S., Blair, C., &Huebsch, P. D. (2000). Group remembering: Does social loafing underlie collaborative inhibition?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,26, 1568–1577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Wells, G. L., Lindsay, R. C. L., &Ferguson, T. J. (1979). Accuracy, confidence, and juror perceptions in eyewitness identification.Journal of Applied Psychology,64, 440–448.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Zaragoza, M. S., &Mitchell, K. J. (1996). Repeated exposure to suggestion and the creation of false memories.Psychological Science,7, 294–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Psychonomic Society, Inc. 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Henry L. Roediger
    • 1
  • Michelle L. Meade
  • Erik T. Bergman
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyWashington UniversitySt. Louis

Personalised recommendations