Advertisement

Animal Learning & Behavior

, Volume 32, Issue 1, pp 24–35 | Cite as

Socially biased learning in monkeys

  • D. FragaszyEmail author
  • E. Visalberghi
Article

Abstract

We review socially biased learning about food and problem solving in monkeys, relying especially on studies with tufted capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) and callitrichid monkeys. Capuchin monkeys most effectively learn to solve a new problem when they can act jointly with an experienced partner in a socially tolerant setting and when the problem can be solved by direct action on an object or substrate, but they do not learn by imitation. Capuchin monkeys are motivated to eat foods, whether familiar or novel, when they are with others that are eating, regardless of what the others are eating. Thus, social bias in learning about foods is indirect and mediated by facilitation of feeding. In most respects, social biases in learning are similar in capuchins and callitrichids, except that callitrichids provide more specific behavioral cues to others about the availability and palatability of foods. Callitrichids generally are more tolerant toward group members and coordinate their activity in space and time more closely than capuchins do. These characteristics support stronger social biases in learning in callitrichids than in capuchins in some situations. On the other hand, callitrichids’ more limited range of manipulative behaviors, greater neophobia, and greater sensitivity to the risk of predation restricts what these monkeys learn in comparison with capuchins. We suggest that socially biased learning is always the collective outcome of interacting physical, social, and individual factors, and that differences across populations and species in social bias in learning reflect variations in all these dimensions. Progress in understanding socially biased learning in nonhuman species will be aided by the development of appropriately detailed models of the richly interconnected processes affecting learning.

Keywords

Social Learning Japanese Macaque Capuchin Monkey Lion Tamarin Tufted Capuchin 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Addessi, E., &Visalberghi, E. (2001). Social facilitation of eating novel foods in tufted capuchins (Cebus apella): Input provided by group members and responses affected in the observer.Animal Cognition,4, 297–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Addessi, E., &Visalberghi, E. (2002).Capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) do not match the food choice performed by a group member. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
  3. Boinski, S., Treves, A., &Chapman, C. (2000). A critical evaluation of the effects of predators on primates: Effects on group travel. In S. Boinski & P. Garber (Eds.),On the move: How and why animals travel in groups (pp. 43–72). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bray, D. (2003). Molecular networks: The top-down view.Science,301, 1864–1865.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Buchanan-Smith, H., &Hardie, S. (1997). Tamarin mixed-species groups: An evaluation of a combined captive and field approach.Folia Primatologica,68, 272–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Caldwell, C., &Whiten, A. (2003). Scrounging facilitates social learning in marmosets,Callithrix jacchus.Journal of Comparative Psychology,65, 1085–1092.Google Scholar
  7. Camazine, S. (2001).Self-organization in biological systems. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Cambefort, J. P. (1981). A comparative study of culturally transmitted patterns of feeding habits in the chacma baboonPapio ursinus and the vervet monkeyCercopithecus aethiops.Folia Primatologica,36, 243–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Coussi-Korbel, S., &Fragaszy, D. M. (1995). On the relation between social dynamics and social learning.Animal Behaviour,50, 1441–1453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Custance, D. M., Whiten, A., &Bard, K. A. (1995). Can young chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) imitate arbitrary actions? Hayes and Hayes (1952) revisited.Behaviour,132, 837–859.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Custance, D. [M.], Whiten, A., &Fredman, T. (1999). Social learning of an artificial fruit task in capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella).Journal of Comparative Psychology,113, 13–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Day, R., Coe, R., Kendal, J., &Laland, K. (2003). Neophilia, innovation and social learning: A study of intergeneric differences in callitrichid monkeys.Animal Behaviour,65, 559–571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. de Waal, F. (1997). Food transfers through mesh in brown capuchins.Journal of Comparative Psychology,111, 370–378.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. de Waal, F., Luttrell, L., &Canfield, M. (1993). Preliminary data on voluntary food-sharing in brown capuchins.American Journal of Primatology,29, 73–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dietz, J., Peres, C., &Pinder, L. (1997). Foraging ecology and use of space in wild golden lion tamarins.American Journal of Primatology,41, 289–305.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Drapier, M., Addessi, E., &Visalberghi, E. (2003). Response ofCebus apella to foods flavored with familiar or novel odor.International Journal of Primatology,24, 295–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Elman, J. L., Bates, E. A., Johnson, M. H., Karmiloff-Smith, A., Parisi, D., &Plunkett, K. (1996).Rethinking innateness. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  18. Feistner, A., &McGrew, W. C. (1989). Food sharing in lion tamarins: Tests of three hypotheses.American Journal of Primatology,31, 211–221.Google Scholar
  19. Ferrari, P.F., Gallese, V., Rizzolatti, G., &Fogassi, L. (2003). Mirror neurons responding to the observation of ingestive and communicative mouth actions in the monkey ventral premotor cortex.European Journal of Neuroscience,17, 1703–1714.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Fewell, J. (2003). Social insect networks.Science,301, 1867–1870.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Fragaszy, D. M., &Adams-Curtis, L. (1990). Challenge in captivity. In H. Box (Ed.),Primate responses to environmental change (pp. 239–264). London: Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar
  22. Fragaszy, D. M.,Deputte, B. L.,Hemery, C., &Johnson, M. H. (1998).Human-reared capuchins match familiar but not novel actions. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
  23. Fragaszy, D.M., Feuerstein, J.M., &Mitra, D. (1997). Transfers of food from adults to infants in tufted capuchins (Cebus apella).Journal of Comparative Psychology,111, 194–200.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Fragaszy, D. M.,Landau, K., &Leighty, K. (2001).Inducing traditions in capuchin monkeys, Part I. Unpublished raw data.Google Scholar
  25. Fragaszy, D. M., Landau, K., &Leighty, K. (2002). Inducing traditions in captive capuchins: Part I. InCaring for primates. Abstracts of the XIX Congress of the International Primatological Society (pp. 317–318). Beijing: Mammalogical Society of China.Google Scholar
  26. Fragaszy, D. M., &Visalberghi, E. (1989). Social influences on the acquisition and use of tools in tufted capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella).Journal of Comparative Psychology,103, 159–170.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Fragaszy, D. M., &Visalberghi, E. (2001). Recognizing a swan: Socially-biased learning.Psychologia,44, 82–98.Google Scholar
  28. Fragaszy, D. M., Visalberghi, E., &Fedigan, L. M. (2004).The complete capuchin: The biology of the genus Cebus. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Fragaszy, D. M., Visalberghi, E., &Galloway, A. (1997). Infant tufted capuchin monkeys’ behaviour with novel foods: Opportunism, not selectivity.Animal Behaviour,53, 1337–1343.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Fragaszy, D.M., Vitale, A. F., &Ritchie, B. (1994). Variation among juvenile capuchins in social influences on exploration.American Journal of Primatology,32, 249–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Gallese, V., Fadiga, L., Fogassi, L., &Rizzolatti, G. (1996). Action recognition in the premotor cortex.Brain,119, 593–609.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Galloway, A. (1998).Social inducement of feeding and food preferences in pair-housed capuchin monkeys, Cebus apella. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Georgia.Google Scholar
  33. Goodall, J. (1964). Tool using and aimed throwing in a community of chimpanzees.Nature,201, 1264–1266.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Hardie, S., &Buchanan-Smith, H. (2000). Responses of captive single- and mixed-species groups of Saguinus to novel nonthreatening objects.International Journal of Primatology,21, 629–648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hayes, K., &Hayes, C. (1952). Imitation in a home-reared chimpanzee.Journal of Comparative & Physiological Psychology,45, 450–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hemelrijk, C. (2002). Understanding social behaviour with the help of complexity science.Ethology,108, 655–671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hemery, C., Fragaszy, D. M., &Deputte, B. [L.] (1998). Humansocialized capuchins match objects but not actions.Congress of the International Primatological Society: Abstracts,17, 45.Google Scholar
  38. Herv., N., &Deputte, B. L. (1993). Social influence in manipulations of a capuchin monkey raised in a human environment: A preliminary case study.Primates,34, 227–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hikami, K. (1991). Social transmission of learning in Japanese monkeys (Macaca fuscata). In A. Ehara, T. Kimura, O. Takemaka, & M. Iwamoto (Eds.),Primatology Today (pp. 343–344). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  40. Hirata, S., Watanabe, K., &Kawai, M. (2001). “Sweet-potato washing” revisited. In T. Matsuzawa (Ed.),Primate origins of human cognition and behavior (pp. 487–509). Tokyo: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  41. Huffman, M. (1996). Acquisition of innovative cultural behaviors in nonhuman primates: A case study of stone handling, a socially transmitted behavior in Japanese macaques. In C. Heyes & B. Galef (Eds.),Animal social learning: The roots of culture (pp. 267–289). New York: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Huffman, M., &Hirata, S. (2003). Biological and ecological foundations of primate behavioral tradition. In D. Fragaszy & S. Perry (Eds.),The biology of traditions: Models and evidence (pp. 267–296). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Itani, J., &Nishimura, A. (1973). The study of infrahuman culture in Japan. In E.W. Menzel, Jr. (Ed.),Symposia of the Fourth International Congress of Primatology: Vol. 1 (pp. 20–26). Basel: Karger.Google Scholar
  44. Jasny, B., &Ray, L. (2003). Life and the art of networks.Science,301, 1863.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Kamil, A. (1998). On the proper definition of cognitive ethology. In R. Balda, I. Pepperberg, & A. Kamil (Eds.),Animal cognition in nature (pp. 1–28). New York: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Kawai, M. (1965). Newly-acquired pre-cultural behavior of a natural troop of Japanese monkeys on Koshima Island.Primates,6, 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Kawamura, S. (1965). Sub-culture among Japanese macaques. In S. Kawamura & J. Itani (Eds.),Monkeys and apes: Sociological studies (pp. 237–289). Tokyo: Chuokoronsha.Google Scholar
  48. Klopfer, P.H. (1961). Observation learning in birds: The establishment of behavioral modes.Behaviour,17, 71–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Kummer, H., &Goodall, J. (1985). Conditions of innovative behaviour in primates.Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London: Series B,308, 203–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Laland, K., &Kendal, J. (2003). What the models tell us about social learning. In D. Fragaszy & S. Perry (Eds.),The biology of traditions: Models and evidence (pp. 33–55). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Lefebvre, L. (2000). Feeding innovations and their cultural transmission in bird populations. In C. Heyes & L. Huber (Eds.),The evolution of cognition (pp. 311–328). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  52. Lepoivre, H., &Pallaud, B. (1985). Social facilitation in a troop of guinea baboons (Papio papio) living in an enclosure.Behavioural Processes,11, 405–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. McGrew, W. C. (1974). Tool use by wild chimpanzees in feeding upon driver ants.Journal of Human Evolution,3, 501–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. McGrew, W. C., &Tutin, C. (1973). Chimpanzee tool use in dental grooming.Nature,241, 477–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Mineka, S., &Cook, M. (1988). Social learning and acquisition of snake fear responses in monkeys. In T. R. Zentall & B. G. Galef (Eds.),Social learning: Psychological and biological perspectives (pp. 51–73). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  56. Myowa-Yamakoshi, M., &Matsuzawa, T. (1999). Factors influencing imitation of manipulatory actions in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes).Journal of Comparative Psychology,113, 128–136.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Myowa-Yamakoshi, M., &Matsuzawa, T. (2000). Imitation of intentional manipulatory actions in chimpanzees.Journal of Comparative Psychology,114, 381–391.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Prescott, M., &Buchanan-Smith, H. (1999). Intra- and inter-species social learning of a novel food task in two species of tamarins.International Journal of Comparative Psychology,12, 71–92.Google Scholar
  59. Price, E., &Feistner, A. (1993). Food sharing in lion tamarins: Tests of three hypotheses.American Journal of Primatology,31, 211–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Queyras, A., Scolavino, M., Puopolo, M., &Vitale, A. (2000). Social influence on induced food preference in common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus).Folia Primatologica,71, 367–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Rapaport, L. (1999). Provisioning of young in golden lion tamarins (Callitrichidae,Leontopithecus rosalia): A test of the information hypothesis.Ethology,105, 619–636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Rapaport, L., &Ruiz-Miranda, C. (2002). Tutoring in wild golden lion tamarins.International Journal of Primatology,23, 1063–1070.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Rizzolatti, G., Fadiga, L., Gallese, V., &Fogassi, L. (1996). Premotor cortex and the recognition of motor actions.Cognitive Brain Research,3, 131–141.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Rylands, A. (1993).Marmosets and tamarins: Systematics, behaviour, and ecology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  65. Snowdon, C., &Boe, C. (2003). Social communication about unpalatable foods in tamarins (Saguinus oedipus).Journal of Comparative Psychology,117, 142–148.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Tomasello, M., Kruger, A. C., &Ratner, H. H. (1993). Cultural learning.Behavioral & Brain Sciences,16, 495–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Visalberghi, E. (1990). Tool use in capuchin monkeys.Folia Primatologica,54, 146–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Visalberghi, E. (1993). Capuchin monkeys: A window into tool use in apes and humans. In K. Gibson & T. Ingold (Eds.),Tools, language, and cognition in human evolution (pp. 138–150). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  69. Visalberghi, E., &Addessi, E. (2000a). Response to changes in food palatability in tufted capuchin monkeys,Cebus apella.Animal Behaviour,59, 231–238.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. Visalberghi, E., &Addessi, E. (2000b). Seeing group members eating a familiar food enhances the acceptance of novel foods in capuchin monkeys.Animal Behaviour,60, 69–76.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. Visalberghi, E., &Addessi, E. (2001). Acceptance of novel foods in capuchin monkeys: Do specific social facilitation and visual stimulus enhancement play a role?Animal Behaviour,62, 567–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Visalberghi, E., &Fragaszy, D. M. (1990a). Do monkeys ape? In S. T. Parker & K. R. G. Gibson (Eds.),“Language” and intelligence in monkeys and apes (pp. 247–273). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Visalberghi, E., &Fragaszy, D. M. (1990b). Food-washing behaviour in tufted capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) and crabeating macaques,Macaca fascicularis.Animal Behaviour,40, 829–836.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Visalberghi, E., &Fragaszy, D. [M.] (1995). The behaviour of capuchin monkeys,Cebus apella, with novel food: The role of social context.Animal Behaviour,49, 1089–1095.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Visalberghi, E., &Fragaszy, D. [M.] (2002). Do monkeys ape? Ten years later. In K. Dautenhahn & C. Nehaniv (Eds.),Imitation in animals and artifacts (pp. 471–479). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  76. Visalberghi, E., Janson, C. H., &Agostini, I. (2003). Response toward novel foods and novel objects in wildCebus apella.International Journal of Primatology,24, 653–675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Visalberghi, E., Valente, M., &Fragaszy, D. [M.] (1998). Social context and consumption of unfamiliar foods by capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) over repeated encounters.American Journal of Primatology,45, 367–380.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. Voelkl, B., &Huber, L. (2000). True imitation in marmosets.Animal Behaviour,60, 195–202.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. Warden, C. J., Fjeld, H. A., &Koch, A. M. (1940). Imitative behavior in cebus and rhesus monkeys.Journal of Genetic Psychology,56, 311–322.Google Scholar
  80. Watanabe, K. (1994). Precultural behavior of Japanese macaques: Longitudinal studies of the Koshima troops. In R. A. Gardner, A. B. Chiarelli, B. T. Gardner, & F. X. Plooij (Eds.),The ethnological roots of culture (pp. 81–94). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar
  81. West, M., King, A., &White, D. (2003). Discovering culture in birds: The role of learning and development. In F. de Waal & P. Tyack (Eds.),Animal social complexity (pp. 470–492). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  82. Westergaard, G. C., &Fragaszy, D. M. (1985). Effects of manipulatable objects on the activity of captive capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella).Zoo Biology,4, 317–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Westergaard, G. C., &Fragaszy, D.M. (1987). The manufacture and use of tools by capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella).Journal of Comparative Psychology,101, 159–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Zentall, T., &Galef, B. G. (1988).Social learning: Psychological and biological perspectives. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  85. Zuberbühler, K., Gygax, L., Harley, N., &Kummer, H. (1996). Stimulus enhancement and spread of a spontaneous tool use in a colony of long-tailed macaques.Primates,37, 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Psychonomic Society, Inc. 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Psychology DepartmentUniversity of GeorgiaAthens
  2. 2.Istituto di Scienze e Tecnologie della CognizioneCNRRomeItaly

Personalised recommendations