Memory & Cognition

, Volume 35, Issue 1, pp 95–106 | Cite as

On the nature of the affective priming effect: Effects of stimulus onset asynchrony and congruency proportion in naming and evaluative categorization

  • Adriaan Spruyt
  • Dirk Hermans
  • Jan De Houwer
  • Heleen Vandromme
  • Paul Eelen


In line with the hypothesis that affective priming of evaluative categorization responses is based on processes that operate at a response selection stage, it has been observed that increasing the proportion of congruent trials brings about increased affective priming effects at short stimulus onset asynchronies (SOAs) in the evaluative categorization task. In the present study, we orthogonally manipulated the congruency proportion (.25, .50, and .75) and the SOA (0, 200, and 1,000 msec) in the evaluative categorization task and a naming task. Results showed that at both short and long SOAs, the affective priming effect in the evaluative categorization task was influenced by the congruency proportion. In contrast, affective priming effects in the naming task were unaffected by the congruency proportion at short SOAs. This pattern of results provides corroborating evidence for the hypotheses (1) that different processes underlie the affective priming effect in the evaluative categorization task and the naming task and (2) that valenced stimuli can automatically preactivate the memory representations of other, affectively related stimuli.


  1. Anderson, J. R. (1983).The architecture of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, J. R., &Bower, G. H. (1973).Human associative memory. Washington, DC: Winston.Google Scholar
  3. Bargh, J. A.. (1996). Automaticity in social psychology. In E. T. Higgins & A. W. Kruglanski (Eds.),Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 169–183). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  4. Bargh, J. A. (1997). The automaticity of everyday life. In R. S. Wyer, Jr. (Ed.),The automaticity of everyday life: Advances in social cognition (Vol. 10, pp. 1–61). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  5. Bargh, J. A., Chaiken, S., Raymond, P., &Hymes, C. (1996). The automatic evaluation effect: Unconditional automatic attitude activation with a pronunciation task.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,32, 104–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bargh, J. A., Litt, J., Pratto, F., &Spielman, L. A. (1989). On the preconscious evaluation of social stimuli. In A. F. Bennett & K. M. McConkey (Eds.),Cognition in individual and social contexts: Proceedings of the XXIV International Congress of Psychology (Vol. 3, pp. 357–370). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  7. Berner, M. P., &Maier, M. A. (2004). The direction of affective priming as a function of trait anxiety when naming target words with regular and irregular pronunciation.Experimental Psychology,51, 180–190.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Bower, G. H. (1991). Mood congruity of social judgments. In J. P. For-gas (Ed.),Emotion and social judgments (International Series in Experimental Social Psychology, pp. 31–53). Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar
  9. Center for the Psychophysiological Study of Emotion and Attention (1994).The International Affective Picture System. Gainesville: University of Florida, Center for Research in Psychophysiology.Google Scholar
  10. Chen, M., &Bargh, J. A. (1999). Consequences of automatic evaluation: Immediate behavioral predispositions to approach or avoid the stimulus.Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin,25, 215–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cohen, J. D., Dunbar, K., &McClelland, J. L. (1990). On the control of automatic processes: A parallel distributed processing account of the Stroop effect.Psychological Review,97, 332–361.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Collins, A. M., &Loftus, E. F. (1975). A spreading activation theory of semantic processing.Psychological Review,82, 407–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Collins, A. M., &Quillian, M. R. (1969). Retrieval time from semantic memory.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,8, 240–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dalrymple-Alford, E. C., &Budayr, B. (1966). Examination of some aspects of the Stroop color-word test.Perceptual & Motor Skills,23, 1211–1214.Google Scholar
  15. Dalrymple-Alford, E. C., &Marmurek, H. H. C. (1999). Semantic priming in fully recurrent network models of lexical knowledge.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,25, 758–775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. De Groot, A. M. B. (1984). Primed lexical decision: Combined effects of the proportion of related prime-target pairs and the stimulus-onset asynchrony of prime and target.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,36A, 253–280.Google Scholar
  17. De Houwer, J. (2003). A structural analysis of indirect measures of attitudes. In J. Musch & K. C. Klauer (Eds.),The psychology of evaluation: Affective processes in cognition and emotion (pp. 219–244). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  18. De Houwer, J., &Hermans, D. (1994). Differences in the affective processing of words and pictures.Cognition & Emotion,8, 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. De Houwer, J., Hermans, D., &Eelen, P. (1998). Affective and identity priming with episodically associated stimuli.Cognition & Emotion,12, 145–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. De Houwer, J., Hermans, D., Rothermund, K., &Wentura, D. (2002). Affective priming of semantic categorization responses.Cognition & Emotion,16, 643–666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. De Houwer, J., Hermans, D., &Spruyt, A. (2001). Affective priming of pronunciation responses: Effects of target degradation.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,37, 85–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. De Houwer, J., &Randell, D. (2004). Robust affective priming effects in a conditional pronunciation task: Evidence for the semantic representation of evaluative information.Cognition & Emotion,18, 251–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. den Heyer, K., Briand, K., &Dannenbring, G. L. (1983). Strategic factors in a lexical-decision task: Evidence for automatic and attention-driven processes.Memory & Cognition,11, 374–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Draine, S. C., &Greenwald, A. G. (1998). Replicable unconscious semantic priming.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,127, 286–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Duckworth, K. L., Bargh, J. A., Garcia, M., &Chaiken, S. (2002). The automatic evaluation of novel stimuli.Psychological Science,13, 513–519.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Fazio, R. H. (2001). On the automatic activation of associated evaluations: An overview.Cognition & Emotion,15, 115–141.Google Scholar
  27. Fazio, R. H., Sanbonmatsu, D. M., Powell, M. C., &Kardes, F. R. (1986). On the automatic activation of attitudes.Journal of Personality & Social Psychology,50, 229–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ferguson, M. J., &Bargh, J. A. (2003). The constructive nature of automatic evaluation. In J. Musch & K. C. Klauer (Eds.),The psychology of evaluation: Affective processes in cognition and emotion (pp. 169–188). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  29. Ferguson, M. J., Bargh, J. A., &Nayak, D. A.. (2005). After-affects: How automatic evaluations influence the interpretation of subsequent, unrelated stimuli.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,41, 182–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Fiske, S. T., &Pavelchak, M. A. (1986). Category-based versus piecemeal-based affective responses: Developments in schema-triggered affect. In R. M. Sorrentino & E. T. Higgins (Eds.),Handbook of motivation and cognition: Foundations of social behavior (pp. 167–203). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  31. Fox, E. (1995). Negative priming from ignored distractors in visual selection: A review.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,2, 145–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Gardner, R. M. (1985). The reverse affect test: A new interference task.Perceptual & Motor Skills,60, 384–386.Google Scholar
  33. Giner-Sorolla, R., García, M. T., &Bargh, J. A.. (1999). The automatic evaluation of pictures.Social Cognition,17, 76–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Glaser, J., &Banaji, M. R. (1999). When fair is foul and foul is fair: Reverse priming in automatic evaluation.Journal of Personality & Social Psychology,77, 669–687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Glaser, W. R. (1992). Picture naming.Cognition,42, 61–105.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Glaser, W. R., &Glaser, M. O. (1989). Context effects in Stroop-like word and picture processing.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,118, 13–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Greenwald, A. G., &Banaji, M. R. (1995). Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes.Psychological Review,102, 4–27.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Greenwald, A. G., Klinger, M. R., &Liu, T. J. (1989). Unconscious processing of dichoptically masked words.Memory & Cognition,17, 35–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Greenwald, A. G., Klinger, M. R., &Schuh, E. S. (1995). Activation by marginally perceptible (“subliminal”) stimuli: Dissociation of unconscious from conscious cognition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,124, 22–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Hermans, D. (1996).Automatische stimulusevaluatie: Een experimen-tele analyse van de voorwaarden voor evaluatieve stimulusdiscrimi-natie aan de hand van het affectieve-primingparadigma [Automatic stimulus evaluation: An experimental analysis of the preconditions for evaluative stimulus discrimination using an affective priming paradigm]. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Leuven, Belgium.Google Scholar
  41. Hermans, D., Baeyens, F., &Eelen, P. (1998). Odours as affective-processing context for word evaluation: A case of cross-modal affective priming.Cognition & Emotion,12, 601–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Hermans, D., Clarysse, J., Baeyens, F., &Spruyt, A.. (2003).Affect (Version 3.0) [Computer software]. Leuven: University of Leuven. Retrieved from Scholar
  43. Hermans, D., Crombez, G., &Eelen, P. (2000). Automatic attitude activation and efficiency: The fourth horseman of automaticity.Psychologica Belgica,40, 3–22.Google Scholar
  44. Hermans, D., De Houwer, J., &Eelen, P. (1994). The affective priming effect: Automatic activation of evaluative information in memory.Cognition & Emotion,8, 515–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Hermans, D., De Houwer, J., &Eelen, P. (2001). A time course analysis of the affective priming effect.Cognition & Emotion,15, 143–165.Google Scholar
  46. Hermans, D., Spruyt, A., De Houwer, J., &Eelen, P. (2003). Affective priming with subliminally presented pictures.Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology,57, 97–114.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Hutchison, K. A. (2003). Is semantic priming due to association strength or feature overlap? A microanalytic review.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,10, 785–813.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Kahneman, D., &Treisman, A. (1984). Changing views of attention and automaticity. In R. Parasuraman & D. R. Davies (Eds.),Varieties of attention (pp. 29–61). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  49. Kawamoto, A. H. (1988). Distributed representations of ambiguous words and their resolution in a connectionist network. In S. L. Small, G. W. Cottrell, & M. K. Tanenhaus (Eds.),Lexical ambiguity resolution: Perspectives from psycholinguistics, neuropsychology, and artificial intelligence (pp. 195–228). San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.Google Scholar
  50. Klauer, K. C. (1998). Affective priming.European Review of Social Psychology,8, 63–107.Google Scholar
  51. Klauer, K. C., &Musch, J. (2001). Does sunshine prime loyal? Affective priming in the naming task.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,54, 727–751.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Klauer, K. C., &Musch, J. (2002). Goal-dependent and goal-independent effects of irrelevant evaluations.Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin,28, 802–814.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Klauer, K. C., &Musch, J. (2003). Affective priming: Findings and theories. In J. Musch & K. C. Klauer (Eds.),The psychology of evaluation: Affective processes in cognition and emotion (pp. 7–49). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  54. Klauer, K. C., Roßnagel, C., &Musch, J. (1997). List-context effects in evaluative priming.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,23, 246–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Klinger, M. R., Burton, P. C., &Pitts, G. S. (2000). Mechanisms of unconscious priming: I. Response competition, not spreading activation.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,26, 441–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Lazarus, R. S. (1991).Emotion and adaptation. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  57. LeDoux, J. E. (1989). Cognitive-emotional interactions in the brain.Cognition & Emotion, 3, 267–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Logan, G. D. (1980). Attention and automaticity in Stroop and priming tasks: Theory and data.Cognitive Psychology,12, 523–553.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Logan, G. D., &Zbrodoff, N. J. (1979). When it helps to be misled: Facilitative effects of increasing the frequency of conflicting stimuli in a Stroop-like task.Memory & Cognition,7, 166–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Lowe, D. G., &Mitterer, J. O. (1982). Selective and divided attention in a Stroop task.Canadian Journal of Psychology,36, 684–700.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. MacLeod, C. M. (1991). Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: An integrative review.Psychological Bulletin,109, 163–203.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Maier, M. A., Berner, M. P., &Pekrun, R. (2003). Directionality of affective priming: Effects of trait anxiety and activation level.Experimental Psychology,50, 116–123.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Masson, M. E. J. (1995). A distributed model of semantic priming.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,21, 3–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Masson, M. E. J. (1999). Interactive processes in word identification: Modeling context effects in a distributed memory system. In R. M. Klein & P. A. McMullen (Eds.),Converging methods for understanding reading and dyslexia (pp. 373–411). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  65. May, C. P., Kane, M. J., &Hasher, L. (1995). Determinants of negative priming.Psychological Bulletin,118, 35–54.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. McRae, K., de Sa, V. R., &Seidenberg, M. S. (1997). On the nature and scope of featural representations of word meaning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,126, 99–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Murphy, S. T., &Zajonc, R. B. (1993). Affect, cognition, and awareness: Affective priming with optimal and suboptimal stimulus exposures.Journal of Personality & Social Psychology,64, 723–739.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Musch, J., &Klauer, K. C. (2001). Locational uncertainty moderates affective congruency effects in the evaluative decision task.Cognition & Emotion,15, 167–188.Google Scholar
  69. Musch, J., Klauer, K. C., & Mierke, J. (2004).Automatic and strategic components of affective priming. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
  70. Neely, J. H. (1977). Semantic priming and retrieval from lexical memory: Roles of inhibitionless spreading activation and limited-capacity attention.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,106, 226–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Neely, J. H. (1991). Semantic priming effects in visual word recognition: A selective review of current findings and theories. In D. Besner & G. W. Humphreys (Eds.),Basic processes in reading: Visual word recognition (pp. 264–336). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  72. Neely, J. H., Keefe, D. E., &Ross, K. L. (1989). Semantic priming in the lexical decision task: Roles of prospective prime-generated expectancies and retrospective semantic matching.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,15, 1003–1019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Norris, D. (1986). Word recognition: Context effects without priming.Cognition,22, 93–136.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Öhman, A.. (1987). The psychophysiology of emotion: An evolutionary-cognitive perspective.Advances in Psychophysiology,2, 79–127.Google Scholar
  75. Öhman, A.. (1988). Preattentive processes in the generation of emotions. In V. Hamilton, G. H. Bower, & N. Frijda (Eds.),Cognitive perspectives on emotion and motivation (pp. 127–143). Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  76. Ortony, A., Clore, G. L., &Collins, A. (1988).The cognitive structure of emotions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  77. Perea, M., &Rosa, E. (2002). Does the proportion of associatively related pairs modulate the associative priming effect at very brief stimulus-onset asynchronies?Acta Psychologica,110, 103–124.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Rothermund, K., &Wentura, D. (1998). Ein fairer Test für die Akti-vationsausbreitungshypothese: Untersuchung affektiver Kongruenzeffekte in der Stroop-Aufgabe [An unbiased test of a spreading of activation account of affective priming: Analysis of affective congruency effects in the Stroop task].Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie,45, 120–135.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. Scherer, K. R. (1993). Neuroscience projections to current debates in emotion psychology.Cognition & Emotion,7, 1–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Seidenberg, M. S., Waters, G. S., Sanders, M., &Langer, P. (1984). Pre- and postlexical loci of contextual effects on word recognition.Memory & Cognition,12, 315–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Smith, E. R. (1996). What do connectionism and social psychology offer each other?Journal of Personality & Social Psychology,70, 893–912.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Spruyt, A., Hermans, D., De Houwer, J., &Eelen, P. (2002). On the nature of the affective priming effect: Affective priming of naming responses.Social Cognition,20, 227–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Spruyt, A., Hermans, D., De Houwer, J., &Eelen, P. (2004). Automatic non-associative semantic priming: Episodic affective priming of naming responses.Acta Psychologica,116, 39–54.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Spruyt, A., Hermans, D., Pandelaere, M., De Houwer, J., &Eelen, P. (2004). On the replicability of the affective priming effect in the pronunciation task.Experimental Psychology,51, 109–115.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  85. Strack, F., Schwarz, N., Bless, H., Kübler, A., &Wänke, M. (1993). Awareness of the influence as a determinant of assimilation versus contrast.European Journal of Social Psychology,23, 53–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Tweedy, J. R., Lapinski, R. H., &Schvaneveldt, R. W. (1977). Semantic-context effects on word recognition: Influence of varying the proportion of items presented in an appropriate context.Memory & Cognition,5, 84–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Wentura, D. (1999). Activation and inhibition of affective information: Evidence for negative priming in the evaluation task.Cognition & Emotion,13, 65–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Wentura, D. (2000). Dissociative affective and associative priming effects in the lexical decision task: Yes versus no responses to word targets reveal evaluative judgment tendencies.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,26, 456–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Wentura, D., &Rothermund, K. (2003). The “meddling-in” of affective information: A general model of automatic evaluation effects. In J. Musch & K. C. Klauer (Eds.),The psychology of evaluation: Affective processes in cognition and emotion (pp. 51–86). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  90. Whittlesea, B. W. A., &Jacoby, L. L. (1990). Interaction of prime repetition with visual degradation: Is priming a retrieval phenomenon?Journal of Memory & Language,29, 546–565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Zajonc, R. B. (1980). Feeling and thinking: Preferences need no inferences.American Psychologist,35, 151–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Zajonc, R. B. (1984). On the primacy of affect.American Psychologist,39, 117–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Psychonomic Society, Inc. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Adriaan Spruyt
    • 1
  • Dirk Hermans
    • 1
  • Jan De Houwer
    • 2
  • Heleen Vandromme
    • 1
  • Paul Eelen
    • 1
  1. 1.University of LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
  2. 2.Ghent UniversityGhentBelgium

Personalised recommendations