Memory & Cognition

, Volume 32, Issue 5, pp 752–758 | Cite as

Phonology in the bilingual Stroop effect

Article

Abstract

In a bilingual Stroop task, we examined between-language interference among proficient Japanese— English bilingual speakers. Participants named ink colors either in Japanese or in English. The Japanese color terms were either phonologically similar to (i.e., loan words) or dissimilar from (i.e., traditional color terms) English color terms. For both response languages, a significant between-language Stroop effect was found despite the orthographic dissimilarity between the languages. The magnitude of the between-language interference was larger with the phonologically similar terms. These findings implicate direct links connecting phonologically similar matching words in the lexicons of proficient bilingual speakers of dissimilar languages and imply that phonological processing in lexical access occurs even when the access is done unintentionally.

References

  1. Brauer, M. (1998). Stroop interference in bilinguals: The role of similarity between the two languages. In A. F. Healy & L. E. Bourne, Jr. (Eds.),Foreign language learning: Psycholinguistic studies on training and retention (pp. 317–337). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  2. Chen, H.-C., &Ho, C. (1986). Development of Stroop interference in Chinese—English bilinguals.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,12, 397–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cohen, J. D., Dunbar, K., &McClelland, J. L. (1990). On the control of automatic processes: A parallel distributed processing account of the Stroop effect.Psychological Review,97, 332–361.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Damian, M. F., &Martin, R. C. (1998). Is visual lexical access based on phonological codes? Evidence from a picture—word interference task.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,5, 91–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Davelaar, E., Coltheart, M., Besner, D., &Jonasson, J. T. (1978). Phonological recoding and lexical access.Memory & Cognition,6, 391–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dyer, F. N. (1971). Color-naming interference in monolinguals and bilinguals.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,10, 297–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fang, S. P., Tzeng, O. J. L., &Alva, L. (1981). Intralanguage vs. interlanguage Stroop effects in two types of writing systems.Memory & Cognition,9, 609–617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Feldman, L. B., &Turvey, M. T. (1980). Words written in Kana are named faster than the same words written in Kanji.Language & Speech,23, 141–147.Google Scholar
  9. Francis, W. S. (1999). Cognitive integration of language and memory in bilinguals: Semantic representation.Psychological Bulletin,125, 193–222.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Frost, R. (1998). Towards a strong phonological theory of visual word recognition: True issues and false trails.Psychological Bulletin,123, 71–99.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Klein, G. S. (1964). Semantic power measured through the interference of words with color-naming.American Journal of Psychology,77, 576–588.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Kolers, P. A. (1966). Interlingual facilitation of short-term memory.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,5, 314–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kroll, J. F., Michael, E., &Sankaranarayanan, A. (1998). A model of bilingual representation and its implications for second language acquisition. In A. F. Healy & L. E. Bourne, Jr. (Eds.),Foreign language learning: Psycholinguistic studies on training and retention (pp. 365–395). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  14. Kroll, J. F., &Stewart, E. (1994). Category interference in translation and picture naming: Evidence for asymmetric connections between bilingual memory representations.Journal of Memory & Language,33, 149–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lukatela, G., &Turvey, M. T. (1994). Visual lexical access is initially phonological: 2. Evidence from phonological priming by homophones and pseudohomophones.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,123, 331–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. MacLeod, C. M. (1991). Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: An integrative review.Psychological Bulletin,109, 163–203.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Mägiste, E. (1984). Stroop tasks and dichotic translation: The development of interference patterns in bilinguals.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,10, 304–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Morikawa, Y. (1981). Stroop phenomena in the Japanese language: The case of ideographic characters (Kanji) and syllabic characters (Kana).Perceptual & Motor Skills,53, 67–77.Google Scholar
  19. Perfetti, C. A., Bell, L. C., &Delaney, S. M. (1988). Automatic (prelexical) phonetic activation in silent word reading: Evidence from backward masking.Journal of Memory & Language,27, 59–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Posner, M. I., &Snyder, C. R. R. (1975). Attention and cognitive control. In R. L. Solso (Ed.),Information processing and cognition: The Loyola symposium (pp. 55–85). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  21. Potter, M. C., So, K.-F., Von Eckardt, B., &Feldman, L. B. (1984). Lexical and conceptual representation in beginning and more proficient bilinguals.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,23, 23–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Preston, M. S., &Lambert, W. E. (1969). Interlingual interference in a bilingual version of the Stroop color—word task.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,8, 295–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Roelofs, A. (2003). Goal-referenced selection of verbal action: Modeling attentional control in the Stroop task.Psychological Review,110, 88–125.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Spinks, J. A., Liu, Y., Perfetti, C. A., &Tan, L. H. (2000). Reading Chinese characters for meaning: The role of phonological information.Cognition,76, B1-B11.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions.Journal of Experimental Psychology,18, 643–662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Tzelgov, J., Henik, A., Sneg, R., &Baruch, O. (1996). Unintentional word reading via the phonological route: The Stroop effect with cross-script homophones.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,22, 336–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Van Orden, G. C. (1987). A ROWS is a ROSE: Spelling, sound, and reading.Memory & Cognition,15, 181–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Psychonomic Society, Inc. 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of ColoradoBoulder

Personalised recommendations