Memory & Cognition

, Volume 30, Issue 3, pp 363–371 | Cite as

Visual imagery can impede reasoning

Article

Abstract

Although it is natural to suppose that visual mental imagery is important in human deductive reasoning, the evidence is equivocal. This article argues that reasoning studies have not distinguished between ease of visualization and ease of constructing spatial models. Rating studies show that these factors can be separated. Their results yielded four sorts of relations: (1)visuospatial relations that are easy to envisage visually and spatially, (2)visual relations that are easy to envisage visually but hard to envisage spatially, (3)spatial relations that are hard to envisage visually but easy to envisage spatially, and (4)control relations that are hard to envisage both visually and spatially. Three experiments showed that visual relations slow down the process of reasoning in comparison with control relations, whereas visuospatial and spatial relations yield inferences comparable with those of control relations. We conclude that irrelevant visual detail can be a nuisance in reasoning and can impede the process.

References

  1. Berendt, B. (1996). Explaining preferred mental models in Allen inferences with a metrical model of imagery. In G. N. Cottrell (Ed.)Proceedings of the Eighteenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 489–494). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  2. Braine, M. D. S., &O’Brien, D. P. (Eds.) (1998).Mental logic. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  3. Byrne, R. M. J., &Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1989). Spatial reasoning.Journal of Memory & Language,28, 564–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Clark, H. H. (1969). Linguistic processes in deductive reasoning.Psychological Review,76, 387–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Clement, C. A., &Falmagne, R. J. (1986). Logical reasoning, world knowledge, and mental imagery: Interconnections in cognitive processes.Memory & Cognition,14, 299–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. DeSoto, L. B., London, M., &Handel, M. S. (1965). Social reasoning and spatial paralogic.Journal of Personality & Social Psychology,2, 513–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. D’Esposito, M., Aguirre, G. K., Zarahn, E., Ballard, D., Shin, R.K., &Lease, J. (1998). Functional MRI studies of spatial and nonspatial working memory.Cognitive Brain Research,7, 1–13.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Egan, D. E., &Grimes-Farrow, D. D. (1982). Differences in mental representations spontaneously adopted for reasoning.Memory & Cognition,10, 297–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Evans, J. S. B. T. (1980). Thinking: Experimental and information processing approaches. In G. Claxton (Ed.),Cognitive psychology: New directions (pp. 275–299). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Finke, R. A. (1989).Principles of mental imagery. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  11. Francis, W. N., &Kucčera, H. (1982).Frequency analysis of English usage: Lexicon and grammar. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  12. Goel, V., &Dolan, R. J. (2001). Functional neuroanatomy of threeterm-relational reasoning.Neuropsychologia,39, 901–909.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Golding, W. (1955).The inheritors. New York: Harcourt Brace.Google Scholar
  14. Huttenlocher, J. (1968). Constructing spatial images: A strategy in reasoning.Psychological Review,75, 550–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Johnson, M. K., &Raye, C. L. (1981). Reality monitoring.Psychological Review,88, 67–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983).Mental models. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1998). Imagery, visualization, and thinking. In J. Hochberg (Ed.),Perception and cognition at century’s end (pp. 441–467). San Diego: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Johnson-Laird, P. N., &Byrne, R. M. J. (1991).Deduction. Hove, U.K.: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  19. Johnson-Laird, P. N., & Byrne, R. M. J. (in press). Conditionals: A theory of meaning, pragmatics, and inference.Psychological Review.Google Scholar
  20. Johnson-Laird, P. N., Byrne, R. M. J, & Tabossi, P. (1989). Reasoning by model: The case of multiple quantifiers.Psychological Review,96, 658–673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Klauer, K. C., Stegmaier, R., &Meiser, T. (1997). Working memory involvement in propositional and spatial reasoning.Thinking & Reasoning,3, 9–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Knauff, M. (1999). The cognitive adequacy of Allen’s interval calculus for qualitative spatial representation and reasoning.Spatial Cognition & Computation,1, 261–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Knauff, M., Jola, C., &Strube, G. (2001). Spatial reasoning: No need for visual information. In D. Montello (Ed.),Spatial information theory: Proceedings of COSIT’01 (pp. 447–457). New York: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Knauff, M., Jola, C., Strube, G., Rauh, R., & Schlieder, C. (2002).Spatial representations can be the basis of reasoning. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
  25. Knauff, M., Kassubek, J., Mulack, T., &Greenlee, M. W. (2000). Cortical activation evoked by visual mental imagery as measured by functional MRI.NeuroReport,11, 3957–3962.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Knauff, M., Mulack, T., Kassubek, J., Salih, H. R., &Greenlee, M. W. (2002). Spatial imagery in deductive reasoning: A functional MRI.Cognitive Brain Research,13, 203–212.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Knauff, M., Rauh, R., Schlieder, C., &Strube, G. (1998). Mental models in spatial reasoning. In C. Freksa, C. Habel, & K. F. Wender (Eds.),Spatial cognition: An interdisciplinary approach to representing and processing spatial knowledge (Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Bd. 1404, pp. 267–291). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  28. Kosslyn, S. M. (1980).Image and mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Kosslyn, S. M. (1994).Image and brain. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  30. Kosslyn, S. M., Alpert, N. M., Thompson, W. L., Maljkovic, V., Weise, S. B., Chabris, C. F., Hamilton, S. E., Rauch, S. L., &Buonanno, F. S. (1993). Visual mental imagery activates topographically organized visual cortex: PET investigations.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,5, 263–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kosslyn, S. M., Pascual-Leone, A., Felician, O., Camposano, S., Keenan, J. P., Thompson, W. L., Ganis, G., Sukel, K. E., &Alpert, N. M. (1999). The role of area 17 in visual imagery: Convergent evidence from PET and rTMS.Science,2, 167–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kosslyn, S. M., Thompson, W. L., &Alpert, N. M. (1997). Neural systems shared by visual imagery and visual perception: A positron emission tomography study.NeuroImage,6, 320–334.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kroger, J., Cohen, J., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (2002).A double dissociation between logic and mathematics: A functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
  34. Landau, B., &Jackendoff, R. (1993). “What” and “where” in spatial language and spatial cognition.Behavioral & Brain Sciences,16, 217–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Logie, R. H. (1995). Visuo-spatial working memory. Hove, U.K.: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  36. Newcombe, F., &Ratcliff, G. (1989). Disorders of visuospatial analysis. In F. Boller & J. Grafman (Eds.),Handbook of neuropsychology (pp. 333–356). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  37. Newcombe, F., Ratcliff, G., &Damasio, H. (1987). Dissociable visual and spatial impairments following right posterior cerebral lesions: Clinical, neuropsychological and anatomical evidence.Neuropsychologia,18, 149–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Newstead, S. E., Pollard P., &Griggs, R. A. (1986). Response bias in relational reasoning.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,24, 95–98.Google Scholar
  39. Osherson, D., Perani, D., Cappa, S., Schnur, T., Grassi, F., &Fazio, F. (1998). Distinct brain loci in deductive versus probabilistic reasoning.Neuropsychologia,36, 369–376.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Paivio, A. (1975). Perceptual comparisons through the mind’s eye.Memory & Cognition,3, 635–647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Pearson, D. G., Logie, R. H., &Gilhooly, K. J. (1999). Verbal representations and spatial manipulation during mental synthesis.European Journal of Experimental Psychology,11, 295–314.Google Scholar
  42. Potts, G. R., &Scholz, K. W. (1975). The internal representation of a three-term series problem.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,14, 439–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Prabhakaran, V., Smith, J. A., Desmond, J. E., Glover, G. H., &Gabrieli, J. D. (1997). Neural substrates of fluid reasoning: An fMRI study of neocortical activation during performance of the Raven’s Progressive Matrices Test.Cognitive Psychology,33, 43–63.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Richardson, J. T. E. (1987). The role of mental imagery in models of transitive inference.British Journal of Psychology,78, 189–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Rips, L. J. (1994).The psychology of proof. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  46. Rueckl, J. G., Cave, K. R., &Kosslyn, S. M. (1989). Why are “what” and “where” processed by separate cortical visual systems? A computational investigation.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,1, 171–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Sabbah, P., Simond, G., Levrier, O., Habib, M., Trabaud, V., Murayama, N., Mazoyer, B. M., Briant, J. F., Raybaud, C., &Salamon, G. (1995). Functional magnetic resonance imaging at 1.5 T during sensorimotor and cognitive tasks.European Journal of Neurology,35, 131–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Shaver, P., Pierson, L., &Lang, S. (1975). Converging evidence for the functional significance of imagery in problem solving.Cognition,3, 359–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Shepard, R. N., &Cooper, L. A. (1982).Mental images and their transformations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  50. Siegel, S., &Castellan, N. J., Jr. (1988).Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  51. Smith, E. E., Jonides, J., Koeppe, R. A., Awh, E., Schuhmacher, E.H., &Minoshima, S. (1995). Spatial versus object working memory: PET investigations.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,7, 337–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Sternberg, R. J. (1980). Representation and process in linear syllogistic reasoning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,109, 119–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Ungerleider, L. G. (1995). Functional brain imaging studies of cortical mechanisms for memory.Science,270, 769–775.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Ungerleider, L. G., &Mishkin, M. (1982). Two cortical visual systems. In D. J. Ingle, M. A. Goodale, & R. J. W. Mansfield (Eds.),Analysis of visual behaviour (pp. 549–586). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Psychonomic Society, Inc. 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center for Cognitive ScienceFreiburg UniversityFreiburgGermany
  2. 2.Princeton UniversityPrinceton

Personalised recommendations