Perception & Psychophysics

, Volume 65, Issue 3, pp 339–351 | Cite as

Task switching mediates the attentional blink even without backward masking

  • Jun -Ichiro KawaharaEmail author
  • Samantha M. Zuvic
  • James T. Enns
  • Vincent Di Lollo


When two targets are presented in rapid succession, perception of the second target is impaired at short intertarget lags (100–700 msec). Thisattentional blink (AB) is thought to occur only when the second target is backward masked. To the contrary, we show that task switching between the targets can produce an AB even without masking (Experiments 1 and 3). Further, we show that task switching produces an AB only when the second target does not belong to a class of overlearned stimuli such as letters or digits (Experiments 1 and 4). When the second target is masked, however, an AB is invariably obtained regardless of switching or overlearning. We propose that task switching involves a timeconsuming process of reconfiguration of the visual system, during which the representation of the second target decays beyond recognition, resulting in an AB deficit. We suggest that overlearned stimuli are encoded in a form that, while maskable, decays relatively slowly, thus outlasting the delay due to reconfiguration and avoiding the AB deficit.


Attentional Blink Rapid Serial Visual Presentation Task Switching Rapid Serial Visual Presentation Stream Letter Condition 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Allport, A., Styles, E. A., &Hsieh, S. (1994). Shifting intentional set: Exploring the dynamics of tasks. In C. Umiltà & M. Moscovitch (Eds.),Attention and performance XV: Conscious and nonconscious information processing (pp. 421–452). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  2. Brehaut, J. C., Enns, J. T., &Di Lollo, V. (1999). Masking plays two roles in the attentional blink.Perception & Psychophysics,61, 1436–1448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chun, M. M. (1997). Temporal binding errors are redistributed in the attentional blink.Perception & Psychophysics,59, 1191–1199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chun, M. M., &Potter, M. C. (1995). A two-stage model for multiple target detection in rapid serial visual presentation.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,21, 109–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Di Lollo, V., Enns, J. T., &Rensink, R. A. (2000). Competition for consciousness among visual events: The psychophysics of reentrant visual processes.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,129, 481–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Duncan, J., Ward, R., &Shapiro, K. L. (1994). Direct measurement of attentional dwell time in human vision.Nature,369, 313–315.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Enns, J. T., &Di Lollo, V. (1997). Object substitution: A new form of masking in unattended visual locations.Psychological Science,3, 135–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Giesbrecht, B. L., &Di Lollo, V. (1998). Beyond the attentional blink: Visual masking by object substitution.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,24, 1454–1466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Isaak, M. I., Shapiro, K. L., &Martin, J. (1999). The attentional blink reflects retrieval competition among multiple rapid serial visual presentation items: Tests of an interference model.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,25, 1774–1792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. James, W. (1950).The principles of psychology (Vol. 1). New York: Dover. (Original work published 1890)Google Scholar
  11. Jolicoeur, P. (1999). Concurrent response-selection demands modulate the attentional blink.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,25, 1097–1113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Jolicoeur, P., &Dell’Acqua, R. (1998). The demonstration of shortterm consolidation.Cognitive Psychology,36, 138–202.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Jolicoeur, P., &Dell’Acqua, R. (1999). Attentional and structural constraints on visual encoding.Psychologische Forschung,3, 154–164.Google Scholar
  14. Kawahara, J., Di Lollo, V., &Enns, J. T. (1999). Attentional blink: Separating what we see from when we see it [Abstract].Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science,40, S259.Google Scholar
  15. Kawahara, J., Di Lollo, V., &Enns, J. T. (2001). Attentional requirements in visual detection and identification.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,27, 969–984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Meiran, N. (1996). Reconfiguration of processing mode prior to task performance.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,22, 1423–1442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Monsell, S. (1996). Control of mental processes. In V. Bruce (Ed.),Unsolved mysteries of the mind: Tutorial essays in cognition (pp. 93–148). Hove, U.K.: Erlbaum (UK) Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  18. Potter, M. C., Chun, M. M., Banks, B. S., &Muckenhoupt, M. (1998). Two attentional deficits in serial target search: The visual attentional blink and an amodal task-switch deficit.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,24, 979–992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Raymond, J. E., Shapiro, K. L., &Arnell, K. M. (1992). Temporary suppression of visual processing in an RSVP task: An attentional blink?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,18, 849–860.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Shapiro, K. L., Raymond, J. E., &Arnell, K. M. (1994). Attention to visual pattern information produces the attentional blink in RSVP.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,20, 357–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Visser, T. A. W., & Bischof, W. F. (2000, November).T1-difficulty and attentional blink: We interrupt this processing to bring you an account. Poster session presented at the 41st Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, New Orleans.Google Scholar
  22. Visser, T. A. W., Bischof, W. F., &Di Lollo, V. (1999). Attentional switching in spatial and non-spatial domains: Evidence from the attentional blink.Psychological Bulletin,125, 458–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Walsh, V., Ashbridge, E., &Cowey, A. (1998). Cortical plasticity in perceptual learning demonstrated by transcranial magnetic stimulation.Neuropsychologia,36, 363–367.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Psychonomic Society, Inc. 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jun -Ichiro Kawahara
    • 1
    Email author
  • Samantha M. Zuvic
    • 2
  • James T. Enns
    • 2
  • Vincent Di Lollo
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyHiroshima UniversityHigashi-HiroshimaJapan
  2. 2.University of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada

Personalised recommendations