Perception & Psychophysics

, Volume 63, Issue 3, pp 541–554 | Cite as

Reference frames and haptic perception of orientation: Body and head tilt effects on the oblique effect

  • Marion Luyat
  • Edouard Gentaz
  • Tony Regia Corte
  • Michel Guerraz


The aim of this study was to examine the effect of body and head tilts on the haptic oblique effect. This effect reflects the more accurate processing of vertical and horizontal orientations, relative to oblique orientations. Body or head tilts lead to a mismatch between egocentric and gravitational axes and indicate whether the haptic oblique effect is defined in an egocentric or a gravitational reference frame. The ability to reproduce principal (vertical and horizontal) and oblique orientations was studied in upright and tilted postures. Moreover, by controlling the deviation of the haptic subjective vertical provoked by postural tilt, the possible role of a subjective gravitational reference frame was tested. Results showed that the haptic reproduction of orientations was strongly affected by both the position of the body (Experiment 1) and the position of the head (Experiment 2). In particular, the classical haptic oblique effect observed in the upright posture disappeared in tilted conditions, mainly because of a decrease in the accuracy of the vertical and horizontal settings. The subjective vertical appeared to be the orientation reproduced the most accurately. These results suggest that the haptic oblique effect is not purely gravitationally or egocentrically defined but, rather, depends on a subjective gravitational reference frame that is tilted in a direction opposite to that of the head in tilted postures (Experiment 3).


  1. Appelle, S. (1972). Perception and discrimination as a function of stimulus orientation: The “oblique effect” in man and animals.Psychological Bulletin,78, 266–278.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Appelle, S., &Countryman, M. (1986). Eliminating the haptic oblique effect: Influence of scanning incongruity and prior knowledge of the standards.Perception,15, 365–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Attneave, F., &Olson, R. K. (1967). Discriminability of stimuli varying in physical or retinal orientation.Journal of Experimental Psychology,74, 149–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Balliet, R., &Nakayama, K. (1978). Egocentric orientation is influenced by trained voluntary cyclorotary eye movements.Nature,275, 214–216.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Banks, M. S., &Stolarz, S. J (1975). The effect of head tilt on meridional differences in acuity: Implications for orientation constancy.Perception & Psychophysics,17, 17–22.Google Scholar
  6. Bauermeister, M., Werner, H., &Wapner, S. (1964). The effect of body tilt on tactual-kinesthetic perception of verticality.American Journal of Psychology,77, 451–456.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bles, W., &de Graaf, B. (1991). Ocular rotation and perception of the horizontal under static tilt conditions in patients without labyrinthine function.Acta Otolaryngologica,111, 456–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bryden, M. P. (1977). Measuring handedness with questionnaires.Neuropsychologia,15, 617–624.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Buchanan-Smith, H. M., &Heeley, D. W. (1993). Anisotropic axes in orientation perception are not retinotopically mapped.Perception,22, 1389–1402.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cecala, A. J., &Garner, W. R. (1986). Internal frame of reference as a determinant of the oblique effect.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,12, 314–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chen, S., &Levi, D. M. (1996). Meridional anisotropy in the discrimination of parallel and perpendicular lines—effect of body tilt.Perception,25, 633–649.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Corwin, T. R., Moskowitz-Cook, A., &Green, M. A. (1977). The oblique effect in a vernier acuity situation.Perception & Psychophysics,21, 445–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. DeFord, J. K., Prather, J. R., &Essock, E. A. (1998). Effect of alternative frames of reference on the oblique effect of visual search in varied viewing positions [Abstract].Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science,39 (Suppl.), S167.Google Scholar
  14. DeFord, J. K., Prather, J. R., &Essock, E. A. (1999).The effect of frame-of-reference and target knowledge on the oblique effect of visual search [Abstract].Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science,40 (Suppl.), S347.Google Scholar
  15. de Graaf, B. (1990).Influence of eye movements on visual perception. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Utrecht.Google Scholar
  16. Essock, E. A. (1980). The oblique effect of stimulus identification considered with respect to two classes of oblique effects.Perception,9, 37–46.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Essock, E. A., Krebs, W. K., &Prather, J. R. (1997). Superior sensitivity for tactile stimuli oriented proximally-distally on the finger: Implications for mixed class 1 and class 2 anisotropies.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,23, 515–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ferrante, D., Gerbino, W., &Rock, I. (1995). Retinal vs. environmental orientation in the perception of the right angle.Acta Psychologica,88, 25–32.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Furmanski, C., &Engel, A. (2000). An oblique effect in human primary visual cortex.Nature Neuroscience,3, 535–536.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gentaz, E. (2000). Existe-t-il un effet de l’oblique dans la perception tactile des orientations? [Is there an oblique effect in the tactual perception of orientations?]L’Année Psychologique,100, 111–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gentaz, E., & Ballaz, C. (in press). La perception visuelle des orientations et l’effet de l’oblique. [The visual perception of orientations and the “oblique effect”.]L’Année Psychologique.Google Scholar
  22. Gentaz, E., &Hatwell, Y. (1995). The haptic “oblique effect” in children’s and adults’ perception of orientation.Perception,24, 631–646.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gentaz, E., &Hatwell, Y. (1996). Role of gravitational cues in the haptic perception of orientation.Perception & Psychophysics,58, 1278–1292.Google Scholar
  24. Gentaz, E., &Hatwell, Y. (1998). The haptic oblique effect in the perception of rod orientation by blind adults.Perception & Psychophysics,60, 157–167.Google Scholar
  25. Gentaz, E., &Hatwell, Y. (1999). Role of memorisation conditions in the haptic processing of orientations and the “oblique effect.”British Journal of Psychology,90, 373–388.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gentaz, E., Luyat, M., Cian, C., Hatwell, Y., Barraud, P.-A., & Raphel, C. (in press). The reproduction of vertical and oblique orientations in the visual, haptic, and somato-vestibular systems.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology.Google Scholar
  27. Guerraz, M., Luyat, M., Poquin, D., & Ohlmann, T. (in press). The role of neck afferents on subjective orientation in the visual and tactile sensorial modalities.Acta Otolaryngologica.Google Scholar
  28. Guerraz, M., Poquin, D., Luyat, M., &Ohlmann, T. (1998). Head orientation involvement in assessment of the subjective vertical during whole body tilt.Perceptual & Motor Skills,87, 643–648.Google Scholar
  29. Heeley, D., &Buchanan-Smith, H. (1990). Recognition of stimulus orientation.Vision Research,30, 1429–1437.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Heeley, D., Buchanan-Smith, H., Cromwell, J., &Wright, J. (1997). The oblique effect in orientation acuity.Vision Research,32, 235–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Howard, I. P. (1982).Human visual orientation. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  32. Kerkhoff, G. (1999). Multimodal spatial orientation deficits in leftsided visual neglect.Neuropsychologia,37, 1387–1405.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kerkhoff, G., &Zoelch, C. (1998). Disorders of visual orientation in the frontal plane in patients with visual neglect following right or left parietal lesions.Experimental Brain Research,122, 108–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lechelt, E. C., Eliuk, J., &Tanne, G. (1976). Perceptual orientational asymmetries: A comparison of visual and haptic space.Perception & Psychophysics,20, 463–469.Google Scholar
  35. Lechelt, E. C., &Verenka, A. (1980). Spatial anisotropy in intramodal and cross-modal judgements of stimulus orientations: The stability of the oblique effect.Perception,9, 581–589.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lennie, P. (1974). Head orientation and meridional variations in acuity.Vision Research,14, 107–111.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Luyat, M. (1997). Verticale posturale versus verticale subjective: Une note sur l’étude de la perception de la verticale [Postural vertical and subjective vertical: A note on the study of vertical orientation perception.].L’Année Psychologique,97, 433–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Mittelstaedt, H. (1983). A new solution to the problem of the subjective vertical.Naturwissenschaften,70, 272–281.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Mittelstaedt, H. (1995). The formation of the visual and postural vertical. In T. Mergner & F. Hlavacka (Eds.),Multisensory control of posture (pp. 147–155). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  40. Mittelstaedt, H. (1997). Interaction of eye, head, and trunk-bound information in spatial perception and control.Journal of Vestibular Research,7, 283–302.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Orban, G. A., Vandenbussche, E., &Vogels, R. (1984). Human orientation discrimination tested with long stimuli.Vision Research,24, 121–128.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Parker, D. E., &Poston, R. L. (1984). Tilt from a head-inverted position produces displacement of visual subjective vertical in the opposite direction.Perception & Psychophysics,36, 461–465.Google Scholar
  43. Rock, I. (1990). The frame of reference. In I. Rock (Ed.),The legacy of Solomon Asch (pp. 243–268). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  44. Saarinen, J., &Levi, D. (1995). Orientation anisotropy in vernier acuity.Vision Research,35, 2449–2461.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Van Hof, M. W., &Lagers-van Haselen, G. C. (1994). The oblique effect in the human somatic sensory system.Acta Neurobiologiae Experimentalis,54, 259–262.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Wade, N. J. (1970). Effects of prolongated tilt on visual orientation.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,22, 423–439.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Wade, N. J. (1992). The representation of orientation in vision.Australian Journal of Psychology,44, 139–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Wade, S., &Curthoys, I. (1997). The effect of ocular torsional position on perception of the roll-tilt of visual stimuli.Vision Research,37, 1071–1078.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Psychonomic Society, Inc. 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marion Luyat
    • 1
  • Edouard Gentaz
    • 2
  • Tony Regia Corte
    • 4
  • Michel Guerraz
    • 3
  1. 1.University Charles de GaulleVilleneuve d’AscqFrance
  2. 2.University René-DescartesBoulogne-Billancourt CedexFrance
  3. 3.Institute of NeurologyNational Hospital for Neurology and NeurosurgeryLondonEngland
  4. 4.Laboratoire URECA, UFR de PsychologieUniversité Lille 3Villeneuve d’AscqFrance

Personalised recommendations