Psychonomic Bulletin & Review

, Volume 14, Issue 5, pp 901–907 | Cite as

Who do you look like? Evidence of facial stereotypes for male names

  • Melissa A. Lea
  • Robin D. Thomas
  • Nathan A. Lamkin
  • Aaron Bell
Brief Reports

Abstract

The present research provides evidence that people use facial prototypes when they encounter different names. In Experiment 1, participants created face exemplars for fifteen common male names, subsets of which were endorsed as good examples by a second set of participants. These most typical faces were morphed to create face-name prototypes. In Experiment 2, participants matched one of the names to each of the prototype faces from Experiment 1. Participants’ matching choices showed convergence in naming the prototypes for many of the names. Experiment 3 utilized these same prototypes in a learning task designed to investigate if the face-name associations revealed in Experiment 2 impacted the learnability of the names. Participants learned face-name pairings that had a higher association (based on frequencies from Experiment 2) faster than pairings with a low association. Results suggest a more direct relationship between faces and names than has been previously proposed.

References

  1. Barsalou, L. W. (1999) Perceptual symbol systems.Behavioral & Brain Sciences,22, 577–660.Google Scholar
  2. Bruce, V., &Young, A. (1986). Understanding face recognition.British Journal of Psychology,77, 305–327.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Bruning, J. L., Polinko, N. K., &Buckingham, J. T. (1998). Connotative meanings of names and nicknames: Changes over twenty-seven years.Psychological Reports,83, 427–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cohen, G. (1990). Why is it difficult to put names to faces?British Journal of Psychology,81, 287–297.Google Scholar
  5. Ellis, H. D., Shepherd, J. W., &Davies, G. M. (1979). Identification of familiar and unfamiliar faces from internal and external features: Some implications for theories of face recognition.Perception,8, 431–439.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. English, G., Titchener, E. B., &Weld, H. P. (1916). Minor studies from the psychological laboratory of Cornell University: I. On the psychological response to unknown proper names.American Journal of Psychology,27, 430–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Goldstein, A. G., Chance, J. E., &Gilbert, B. (1984). Facial stereotypes of good guys and bad guys: A replication and extension.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,22, 549–552.Google Scholar
  8. IQ Biometrix (1998).Faces (Version 3.0) [Computer software]. Redwood Shores, CA: Author.Google Scholar
  9. Kasof, J. (1993). Sex bias in the naming of stimulus persons.Psychological Bulletin,113, 140–163.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Lindsay, D. S., Jack, P. C., &Christian, M. A. (1991). Other-race face perception.Journal of Applied Psychology,76, 587–589.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. MacLin, O. H., &Malpass, R. S. (2001). Racial categorization of faces: The ambiguous race face effect.Psychology, Public Policy & Law,7, 98–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. McWeeny, K. H., Young, A. W., Hay, D. C., &Ellis, A. W. (1987). Putting names to faces.British Journal of Psychology,78, 143–149.Google Scholar
  13. Mehrabian, A. (2001). Characteristics attributed to individuals on the basis of their first names.Genetic, Social, & General Psychology Monographs,127, 59–88.Google Scholar
  14. Melara, R. D., &Marks, L. E. (1990). Processes underlying dimensional interactions: Correspondences between linguistic and nonlinguistic dimensions.Memory & Cognition,18, 477–495.Google Scholar
  15. Niedenthal, P. M., Barsalou, L. W., Winkielman, P., Krauth-Gruber, S., &Ric, F. (2005). Embodiment in attitudes, social perception, and emotion.Personality & Social Psychology Review,9, 184–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Perrett, D. I., Lee, K. J., Penton-Voak, I., Rowland, D., Yoshikawa, S., Burt, D. M., et al. (1998). Effects of sexual dimorphism on facial attractiveness.Nature,394, 884–887.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Rosch, E. (1978). Principles of categorization. In E. Rosch & B. Lloyd (Eds.),Cognition and categorization (pp. 27–48). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  18. Sapir, E. (1929). A study of phonetic symbolism.Journal of Experimental Psychology,12, 225–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Satran, P. R., & Rosenkrantz, L. (2004, September). How important is a name?Parenting, 137–143.Google Scholar
  20. Shevlin, M., Walker, S., Davies, M. N. O., Banyard, P., &Lewis, C. A. (2003). Can you judge a book by its cover? Evidence of self-stranger agreement on personality at zero acquaintance.Personality & Individual Differences,35, 1373–1383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Siegel, S., &Castellan, N. J. (1988).Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  22. Sloutsky, V. M., Lo, Y.-F., &Fisher, A. V. (2001). How much does a shared name make things similar? Linguistic labels, similarity, and the development of inductive influence.Child Development,72, 1695–1709.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Valentine, T., Brennen, T., &Bredart, S. (1996).The cognitive psychology of proper names: On the importance of being Ernest. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Valentine, T., &Bruce, V. (1986). The effect of race, inversion and encoding activity upon face recognition.Acta Psychologica,61, 259–273.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Valentine, T., &Moore, V. (1995). Naming faces: The effects of facial distinctiveness and surname frequency.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,48A, 849–878.Google Scholar
  26. Young, A. W., Ellis, A. W., &Flude, B. M. (1988). Accessing stored information about familiar people.Psychological Research,50, 111–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Young, A. W., Hay, D. C., McWeeny, K. H., Flude, B. M., &Ellis, A. W. (1985). Matching familiar and unfamiliar faces on internal and external features.Perception,14, 737–746.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Psychonomic Society, Inc. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Melissa A. Lea
    • 1
  • Robin D. Thomas
    • 2
    • 2
  • Nathan A. Lamkin
    • 2
  • Aaron Bell
    • 2
  1. 1.Millsaps CollegeJackson
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyMiami UniversityOxford

Personalised recommendations