Psychonomic Bulletin & Review

, Volume 13, Issue 3, pp 458–465 | Cite as

Local temporal distinctiveness does not benefit auditory verbal and spatial serial recall

  • Fabrice B. R. Parmentier
  • Suzanne King
  • Ian Dennis
Article
  • 220 Downloads

Abstract

In the present study, we examined the role of randomly arranged temporal intervals preceding and following items (pre- and postitem intervals, respectively) in auditory verbal and spatial recall tasks. The duration of the pre- and postitem intervals did not affect serial recall performance. This finding calls into question (1) the suggestion that the interval following an item permits the consolidation of information in memory, even in a relatively demanding spatial task, and (2) the prediction that temporal distinctiveness should improve performance. The latter was explored further by showing that in contrast to our empirical data, a relative temporal distinctiveness model produced significant increases in recall performance when pre- and postitem intervals increased. The results are discussed with regard to recent studies revisiting the role of temporal isolation in short-term serial memory.

Supplementary material

Parmentier-PBR-2006.zip (13 kb)
Supplementary material, approximately 340 KB.

References

  1. Anderson, J. R., &Matessa, M. (1997). A production system theory of serial memory.Psychological Review,104, 728–748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Avons, S. E. (1998). Serial report and item recognition of novel visual patterns.British Journal of Psychology,89, 285–308.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Bjork, R. A., &Whitten, W. B. (1974). Recency-sensitive retrieval processes in long-term free recall.Cognitive Psychology,6, 173–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brown, G. D. A., Neath, I., & Chater, N. (2006).A ratio model of scale-invariant memory and identification. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
  5. Brown, G. D. A., Preece, T., &Hulme, C. (2000). Oscillator-based memory for serial order.Psychological Review,107, 121–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Burgess N., &Hitch, G. (1999). Memory for serial order: A network model of the phonological loop and its timing.Psychological Review,106, 551–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cowan, N., Keller, T. A., Hulme, C., Roodenrys, S., McDougall, S., &Rack, J. (1994). Verbal memory span in children: Speech timing clues to the mechanisms underlying age and word length effects.Journal of Memory & Language,33, 234–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ebbinghaus, H. (1885).Über das Gedächtnis: Untersuchungen zur experimentellen Psychologie. Leipzig: Duncker & Humblot.Google Scholar
  9. Farrel, S., &Lewandowsky, S. (2002). An endogenous distributed model of ordering in serial recall.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,9, 59–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Glenberg, A. M., &Swanson, N. G. (1986). A temporal distinctiveness theory of recency and modality effects.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,12, 3–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Henson, R. N. A. (1998). Short-term memory for serial order: The start-end model.Cognitive Psychology,36, 73–137.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Jones, D., Farrand, P., Stuart, G., &Morris, N. (1995). Functional equivalence of verbal and spatial information in serial short-term memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,21, 1008–1018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kahana, M. J., &Jacobs, J. (2000). Interresponse time in serial recall: Effect of intraserial repetition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,26, 1188–1197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kubovy, M., &Van Valkenburg, D. (2001). Auditory and visual objects.Cognition,80, 97–126.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Lashley, K. S. (1951). The problem of serial order in behavior. In L. A. Jeffress (Ed.),Cerebral mechanisms in behavior: The Hixon symposium (pp. 112–136). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  16. Lewandowsky, S., &Brown, G. D. A. (2005). Serial recall and presentation schedule: A micro-analysis of local distinctiveness.Memory,13, 283–292.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Lewandowsky, S., Brown, G. D. A., Wright, T., &Nimmo, L. M. (2006). Timeless memory: Evidence against temporal distinctiveness models of short-term memory for serial order.Journal of Memory & Language,54, 20–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lewandowsky, S., Duncan, M., &Brown, G. D. A. (2004). Time does not cause forgetting in short-term serial recall.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,11, 771–790.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lewandowsky, S., &Murdock, B. B., Jr. (1989). Memory for serial order.Psychological Review,96, 25–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Maybery, M. T., Parmentier, F. B. R., &Jones, D. M. (2002). Grouping of list items reflected in the timing of recall: Implications for models of serial verbal memory.Journal of Memory & Language,47, 360–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Nairne, J. S. (1990). A feature model of immediate memory.Memory & Cognition,18, 251–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Neath, I. (1993). Distinctiveness and serial position effects in recognition.Memory & Cognition,21, 689–698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Neath, I. (2000). Modeling the effects of irrelevant speech on memory.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,7, 403–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Neath, I., &Crowder, R. G. (1990). Schedules of presentation and temporal distinctiveness in human memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning, Memory, & Cognition,16, 316–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Neath, I., &Crowder, R. G. (1996). Distinctiveness and very shortterm serial position effects.Memory,4, 225–242.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Ng, H. L. H., &Maybery, M. T. (2002). Temporal grouping effects in short-term memory: An evaluation of time-dependent models.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,55A, 391–424.Google Scholar
  27. Ng, H. L. H., &Maybery, M. T. (2005). Grouping in short-term memory: Do oscillators code the positions of items?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,31, 175–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Nimmo, L. M., &Lewandowsky, S. (2005). From brief gaps to very long pauses: Temporal isolation does not benefit serial recall.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,12, 999–1004.Google Scholar
  29. Nimmo, L. M., & Lewandowsky, S. (in press). Distinctiveness revisited: Unpredictable temporal isolation does not benefit short-term serial recall of heard or seen events.Memory & Cognition.Google Scholar
  30. Parmentier, F. B. R., Elford, G., &Maybery, M. T. (2005). Transitional information in spatial serial memory: Path characteristics affect recall performance.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,31, 412–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Parmentier, F. B. R., &Jones, D. M. (2000). Functional characteristics of auditory temporal-spatial short-term memory: Evidence from serial order errors.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,26, 222–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Parmentier, F. B. R., & Jones, D. M. (2006).The role of attentional resources in remembering auditory spatial sequences. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
  33. Parmentier, F. B. R., Maybery, M. T., &Jones, D. M. (2004). Temporal grouping in auditory spatial serial memory.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,11, 501–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Parmentier, F. B. R., Tremblay, S., &Jones, D. M. (2004). Exploring the suffix effect in serial visuospatial short-term memory.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,11, 289–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Smyth, M. M., &Scholey, K. A. (1996). Serial order in spatial immediate memory.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,49A, 159–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Tremblay, S., Macken, W. J., &Jones, D. M. (2001). The impact of broadband noise on serial memory: Changes in band-pass frequency increase disruption.Memory,9, 323–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Tremblay, S., Nicholls, A. P., Parmentier, F. B. R., &Jones, D. M. (2005). Visual distraction and visuo-spatial memory: A sandwich effect.Memory,13, 357–363.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Ward, G., Avons, S. E., &Melling, L. (2005). Serial position curves in short-term memory: Functional equivalence across modalities.Memory,13, 308–317.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Psychonomic Society, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Fabrice B. R. Parmentier
    • 1
  • Suzanne King
    • 1
  • Ian Dennis
    • 1
  1. 1.School of PsychologyUniversity of PlymouthPlymouthUK

Personalised recommendations