Abstract
Familiarized names are falsely judgedfamous more often than nonfamiliarized names. Banaji and Greenwald (1995) demonstrated a gender bias in thisfalse fame effect, with the effect being larger for male than for female names. This effect was interpreted as reflecting the operation of a gender stereotype. However, the famous male names were, in fact, better known than the famous female names. Thus, the presence of more famous male names during study may have contributed to the observed male-famous association. If so, there should be no gender bias if the studied famous male and female names are equally famous, and a reversed gender bias should emerge if the famous female names are more famous than the male names. In two experiments, these predictions were corroborated. A “classical” gender bias was found only when the famous males were more famous than the famous females. These findings are consistent with the hypothesis that the gender bias in fame judgments, rather than showing implicit gender stereotyping in the sense of a transsituational judgment bias, reflects the fact that, in test, participants select a proportion of fame judgments to male and female names so that it matches the relative degree of fame of male and female names encountered during study.
Article PDF
References
Banaji, M. R., &Greenwald, A. G. (1995). Implicit gender stereotyping in judgments of fame.Journal of Personality & Social Psychology,68, 181–198.
Buchner, A., Steffens, M. C., &Berry, D. C. (2000). Gender stereotyping and decision processes: Extending and reversing the gender bias in fame judgments.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,26, 1215–1227.
Buchner, A., &Wippich, W. (1996). Unconscious gender bias in fame judgments?Consciousness & Cognition,5, 197–220.
Cohen, J. (1977).Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (rev. ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Dywan, J., &Jacoby, L. [L.] (1990). Effects of aging on source monitoring: Differences in susceptibility to false fame.Psychology & Aging,5, 379–387.
Jacoby, L. L., Kelley, C., Brown, J., &Jasechko, J. (1989). Becoming famous overnight: Limits on the ability to avoid unconscious influences of the past.Journal of Personality & Social Psychology,56, 326–338.
Jacoby, L. L., Woloshyn, V., &Kelley, C. (1989). Becoming famous without being recognized: Unconscious influences of memory produced by dividing attention.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,118, 115–125.
Jennings, J. M., &Jacoby, L. L. (1993). Automatic versus intentional uses of memory: Aging, attention, and control.Psychology & Aging,8, 283–293.
Neely, J. H., &Payne, D. G. (1983). A direct comparison of recognition failure rates for recallable names in episodic and semantic memory tests.Memory & Cognition,11, 161–171.
Steffens, M. C., Buchner, A., Martensen, H., &Erdfelder, E. (2000). Further evidence on the similarity of memory processes in the process dissociation procedure and in source monitoring.Memory & Cognition,28, 1152–1164.
Steffens, M. C., Mecklenbräuker, S., Buchner, A., Bachem, P., Decker, C., Kleis, A., Lux, V., &Philippi, R. (1999). Haben implizite Geschlechterstereotype einen Einflu\ auf Berühmtheitsurteile? [Do implicit gender stereotypes influence fame judgments?] In A. Widmann (Ed.),Experimentelle Psychologie; Beiträge zur 41. Tagung experimentell arbeitender Psychologen, Leipzig, 28. März–1. April 1999 (p. 299). Lengerich, Germany: Pabst.
Steffens, M. C., Mecklenbräuker, S., Buchner, A., &Mehl, B. (2004). On the bounded rationality of implicit gender stereotyping in fame judgments.European Journal of Social Psychology,34, 397–406.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
earch reported in this article was supported by Grant Bu 945/1-2 from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft to A.B.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Steffens, M.C., Buchner, A. & Mecklenbräuker, S. Gender bias in fame judgments: Implicit gender stereotyping or matching study phase fame?. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 12, 495–501 (2005). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193794
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193794