Advertisement

Perception & Psychophysics

, Volume 67, Issue 4, pp 659–666 | Cite as

Further evidence for the role of mode-independent short-term associations in spatial Simon effects

  • Jan De HouwerEmail author
  • Tom Beckers
  • Stefaan Vandorpe
  • Roel Custers
Article

Abstract

We examined the conditions under which short-term associations between stimuli and responses can produce spatial Simon effects. On location-relevant trials, participants gave neutral responses (i.e., they uttered the nonsense syllable “bee” or “boo”) on the basis of whether the presented word had the meaning of “left” or “right.” On location-irrelevant trials, they gave the same responses on the basis of the color of left and right squares. Performance on the location-irrelevant trials was affected by the match between the irrelevant location information and the location to which the correct response was assigned on the location-relevant trials. Experiment 1 showed that this extrinsic Simon effect was found only when the words on the location-relevant trials came from two different languages. In Experiment 2, we found an extrinsic Simon effect even when participants only received instructions about how to respond on location-relevant trials but no such trials were actually presented. Our findings suggest that task demands determine whether short-term associations are mode specific or mode independent and confirm that such associations can be set up as the result of instructions only.

Keywords

Simon Effect Stimulus Location Stroop Effect Simon Task Response Compatibility 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Barber, P., &O’Leary, M. (1997). The relevance of salience: Towards an activational account of irrelevant stimulus—response compatibility effects. In B. Hommel & W. Prinz (Eds.),Theoretical issues in stimulus—response compatibility (pp. 135–172). Amsterdam: Elsevier, North-Holland.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cohen, J. D., Dunbar, K., &McClelland, J. L. (1990). On the control of automatic processes: A parallel distributed processing account of the Stroop effect.Psychological Review,97, 332–361.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. De Houwer, J. (2003a). The extrinsic affective Simon task.Experimental Psychology,50, 77–85.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. De Houwer, J. (2003b). On the role of stimulus—response and stimulus— stimulus compatibility in the Stroop effect.Memory & Cognition,31, 353–359.Google Scholar
  5. De Houwer, J. (2003c). A structural analysis of indirect measures of attitudes. In J. Musch & K. C. Klauer (Eds.),The psychology of evaluation: Affective processes in cognition and emotion (pp. 219–244). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  6. De Houwer, J. (2004). Spatial Simon effects with nonspatial responses.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,11, 49–53.Google Scholar
  7. De Jong, R., Liang, C. C., &Lauber, E. (1994). Conditional and unconditional automaticity: A dual-process model of effects of spatial S—R correspondence.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,20, 731–750.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hommel, B. (1997). Toward an action-concept model of stimulus— response compatibility. In B. Hommel & W. Prinz (Eds.),Theoretical issues in stimulus— response compatibility (pp. 281–320). Amsterdam: Elsevier, North-Holland.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kornblum, S., Hasbroucq, T., &Osman, A. (1990). Dimensional overlap. Cognitive basis for stimulus—response compatibility: A model and taxonomy.Psychological Review,97, 253–270.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Lu, C.-H., &Proctor, R. W. (1995). The influence of irrelevant location information on performance: A review of the Simon and spatial Stroop effects.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,2, 174–207.Google Scholar
  11. McClelland, J. L., McNaughton, B. L., &O’Reilly, R. C. (1995). Why there are complementary learning systems in the hippocampus and neocortex: Insights from the successes and failures of connectionist models of learning and memory.Psychological Review,102, 419–437.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Proctor, R.W., &Lu, C.-H. (1999). Processing irrelevant location information: Practice and transfer effects in choice-reaction tasks.Memory & Cognition,27, 63–77.Google Scholar
  13. Proctor, R.W., Marble, J. G., &Vu, K.-P. L. (2000). Mixing incompatibly mapped location-relevant trials with location-irrelevant trials: Effects of stimulus mode in the reverse Simon effect.Psychological Research,64, 11–24.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Proctor, R. W., &Vu, K.-P. L. (2002). Eliminating, magnifying, and reversing spatial compatibility effects with mixed location-relevant and -irrelevant trials. In W. Prinz & B. Hommel (Eds.),Common mechanisms in perception and action: Attention and performance XIX (pp. 443–473). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Simon, J. R. (1990). The effects of an irrelevant directional cue on human information processing. In R. W. Proctor & T. G. Reeve (Eds.),Stimulus—response compatibility: An integrated perspective (pp. 31–86). Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
  16. Tagliabue, M., Zorzi, M., &Umiltà, C. (2002). Cross-modal remapping influences the Simon effect.Memory & Cognition,30, 18–23.Google Scholar
  17. Tagliabue, M., Zorzi, M., Umiltà, C., &Bassignani, F. (2000). The role of long-term-memory and short-term-memory links in the Simon effect.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,26, 648–670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Zhang, H., &Kornblum, S. (1998). The effects of stimulus—response mapping and irrelevant stimulus—response and stimulus—stimulus overlap in four-choice Stroop tasks with single-carrier stimuli.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,24, 3–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Zorzi, M., &Umiltà, C. (1995). A computational model of the Simon effect.Psychological Research,58, 193–205.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Psychonomic Society, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jan De Houwer
    • 1
    Email author
  • Tom Beckers
    • 2
  • Stefaan Vandorpe
    • 1
  • Roel Custers
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyGhent UniversityGhentBelgium
  2. 2.University of LeuvenLeuvenBelgium

Personalised recommendations