Memory & Cognition

, Volume 35, Issue 2, pp 326–333 | Cite as

The representation of explicit motor sequence knowledge

  • Robert Knee
  • Sean Thomason
  • James Ashe
  • Daniel T. Willingham
Article
  • 232 Downloads

Abstract

Much research has investigated the representation of implicitly learned motor sequences: Do subjects learn sequences of stimuli, responses, response locations, or some combination? Most of the work on this subject indicates that when sequences are learned implicitly, it is in terms of response locations. The present work investigated the representation of explicitly learned motor sequences. In four experiments, we found consistent evidence that explicitly learned sequences are represented in terms of stimulus locations. This conclusion held true for both self-report measures (subjects said that they learned stimuli) and performance measures, but when stimuli changed, performance degraded. We interpret these data in a multiple-memory-systems framework.

References

  1. Ashby, F. G., Maddox, W. T., &Bohil, C. J. (2002). Observational versus feedback training in rule-based and information-integration category learning.Memory & Cognition,30, 666–677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ashby, F. G., &Spiering, B. J. (2004). The neurobiology of category learning.Behavioral & Cognitive Neuroscience Reviews,3, 101–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Clegg, B. A. (2005). Stimulus-specific sequence representation in serial reaction time tasks.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,58A, 1087–1101.Google Scholar
  4. Cohen, A., Ivry, R. I., &Keele, S. W. (1990). Attention and structure in sequence learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,16, 17–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cohen, N. J., Poldrack, R. A., &Eichenbaum, H. (1997). Memory for items and memory for relations in the procedural/declarative memory framework.Memory,5, 131–178.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Cohen, N. J., &Squire, L. R. (1980). Preserved learning and retention of pattern-analyzing skill in amnesia: Dissociation of knowing how and knowing that.Science,210, 207–210.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Curran, T., &Keele, S. W. (1993). Attentional and nonattentional forms of sequence learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,19, 189–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Foster, J. K., &Jelicic, M. (Eds.) (1999).Memory: Systems, process, or function? Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Gabrieli, J. D. E. (1998). Cognitive neuroscience of human memory.Annual Review of Psychology,4, 87–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gold, P. E., McIntyre, C., McNay, E., Stefani, M., &Korol, D. L. (2001). Neurochemical referees of dueling memory systems. In P. E. Gold & W. T. Greenough (Eds.),Memory consolidation: Essays in honor of James L. McGaugh (pp. 219–248). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Goschke, T. (1998). Implicit learning of perceptual and motor sequences: Evidence for independent learning systems. In P. A. Frensch (Ed.),Handbook of implicit learning (pp. 401–444). New York: Sage.Google Scholar
  12. Graf, P., &Schacter, D. L. (1985). Implicit and explicit memory for new associations in normal and amnesic subjects.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,11, 501–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Grafton, S. T., Hazeltine, E., &Ivry, R. B. (1998). Abstract and effector-specific representations of motor sequences identified with PET.Journal of Neuroscience,18, 9420–9428.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Grafton, S. T., Salidis, J., &Willingham, D. B. (2001). Motor learning of compatible and incompatible visuomotor maps.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,13, 217–231.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Howard, J. H., Mutter, S. A., &Howard, D. V. (1992). Serial pattern learning by event observation.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,18, 1029–1039.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jiménez, L., &Méndez, C. (1999). Which attention is needed for implicit sequence learning?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,25, 236–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Keele, S. W., Jennings, P., Jones, S., Caulton, D., &Cohen, A. (1995). On the modularity of sequence representation.Journal of Motor Behavior,27, 17–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kesner, R. P. (1998). Neurobiological views of memory. In R. P. Kesner (Ed.),Neurobiology of learning and memory (pp. 361–416). San Diego: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Koch, I., &Hoffmann, J. (2000). The role of stimulus-based and response-based spatial information in sequence learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,26, 863–882.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mayr, U. (1996). Spatial attention and implicit sequence learning: Evidence for independent learning of spatial and nonspatial sequences.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,22, 350–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Nattkemper, D., &Prinz, W. (1997). Stimulus and response anticipation in a serial reaction time task.Psychological Research,60, 98–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Nissen, M. J., &Bullemer, P. (1987). Attentional requirements of learning: Evidence from performance measures.Cognitive Psychology,19, 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Poldrack, R. A., Clark, J., Paré-Blagoev, E. J., Shohamy, D., Moyano, J. C., Myers, C., &Gluck, M. A. (2001). Interactive memory systems in the human brain.Nature,414, 546–550.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Poldrack, R. A., &Packard, M. G. (2003). Competition among multiple memory systems: Converging evidence from animal and human brain studies.Neuropsychologia,41, 245–251.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Poldrack, R. A., Prabhakaran, V., Seger, C. A., &Gabrieli, J. D. E. (1999). Striatal activation during acquisition of a cognitive skill.Neuropsychology,13, 564–574.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Poldrack, R. A., &Rodriguez, P. (2004). How do memory systems interact? Evidence from human classification learning.Neurobiology of Learning & Memory,82, 324–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Reber, P. J., &Squire, L. R. (1998). Encapsulation of implicit and explicit memory in sequence learning.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,10, 248–263.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Reed, J., &Johnson, P. (1994). Assessing implicit learning with indirect tests: Determining what is learned about sequence structure.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,20, 585–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Remillard, G. (2003). Pure perceptual-based sequence learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,29, 581–597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Schacter, D. L., &Tulving, E. (Eds.) (1994).Memory systems 1994. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  31. Squire, L. R. (1992). Memory and the hippocampus: A synthesis from findings with rats, monkeys, and humans.Psychological Review,99, 195–231.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. White, N. M., &McDonald, R. J. (2002). Multiple parallel memory systems in the brain of the rat.Neurobiology of Learning & Memory,77, 125–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Willingham, D. B. (1998). A neuropsychological theory of motor skill learning.Psychological Review,105, 558–584.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Willingham, D. B. (1999). Implicit motor sequence learning is not purely perceptual.Memory & Cognition,27, 561–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Willingham, D. B., &Goedert-Eschmann, K. (1999). The relation between implicit and explicit learning: Evidence for parallel development.Psychological Science,10, 531–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Willingham, D. B., Nissen, M. J., &Bullemer, P. (1989). On the development of procedural knowledge.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,15, 1047–1060.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Willingham, D. B., Salidis, J., &Gabrieli, J. D. E. (2002). Direct comparison of neural systems mediating conscious and unconscious skill learning.Journal of Neurophysiology,88, 1451–1460.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Willingham, D. B., Wells, L. A., Farrell, J. M., &Stemwedel, M. E. (2000). Implicit motor sequence learning is represented in response locations.Memory & Cognition,28, 366–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Ziessler, M. (1994). The impact of motor responses on serial-pattern learning.Psychological Research,57, 30–41.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Ziessler, M. (1998). Response-effect learning as a major component of implicit serial learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,24, 962–978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Ziessler, M., &Nattkemper, D. (2001). Learning of event sequences is based on response-effect learning: Further evidence from a serial reaction task.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,27, 595–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Psychonomic Society, Inc. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert Knee
    • 1
  • Sean Thomason
    • 1
  • James Ashe
    • 2
  • Daniel T. Willingham
    • 3
  1. 1.University of VirginiaCharlottesville
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyVirginia Polytechnic InstituteBlacksburg
  3. 3.Department of PsychologyUniversity of VirginiaCharlottesville

Personalised recommendations