Memory & Cognition

, Volume 34, Issue 4, pp 763–775 | Cite as

Thinking about memories for everyday and shocking events: Do people use ease-of-retrieval cues in memory judgments?

Article
  • 443 Downloads

Abstract

Extant research shows that people use retrieval ease, a feeling-based cue, to judge how well they remember life periods. Extending this approach, we investigated the role of retrieval ease in memory judgments for single events. In Experiment 1, participants who were asked to recall many memories of an everyday event (New Year’s Eve) rated retrieval as more difficult and judged their memory as worse than did participants asked to recall only a few memories. In Experiment 2, this ease-of-retrieval effect was found to interact with the shocking character of the remembered event: There was no effect when the event was highly shocking (i.e., learning about the attacks of September 11, 2001), whereas an effect was found when the event was experienced as less shocking (due either to increased distance to “9/11” or to the nonshocking nature of the event itself). Memory vividness accounted for additional variance in memory judgments, indicating an independent contribution of content-based cues in judgments of event memories.

References

  1. Aiken, L. S., &West, S. G. (1991).Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, S. J., &Conway, M. A. (1993). Investigating the structure of autobiographical memories.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,19, 1178–1196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arkes, H. R., Hackett, C., &Boehm, L. (1989). The generality of the relation between familiarity and judged validity.Journal of Behavioral Decision Making,2, 81–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baron, R. M., &Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations.Journal of Personality & Social Psychology,51, 1173–1182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Begg, I., Duft, S., Lalonde, P., Melnick, R., &Sanvito, J. (1989). Memory predictions are based on ease of processing.Journal of Memory & Language,28, 610–632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Belli, R. F., Winkielman, P., Read, J. D., Schwarz, N., &Lynn, S. J. (1998). Recalling more childhood events leads to judgments of poorer memory: Implications for the recovered/false memory debate.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,5, 318–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Benjamin, A. S., &Bjork, R. A. (1996). Retrieval fluency as a metacognitive index. In L. M. Reder (Ed.),Implicit memory and metacognition (pp. 309–338). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  8. Benjamin, A. S., Bjork, R. A., &Schwartz, B. L. (1998). The mismeasure of memory: When retrieval fluency is misleading as a metamnemonic index.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,127, 55–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bless, H., Strack, F., &Walther, E. (2001). Memory as a target of social influence? Memory distortions as a function of social influence and metacognitive knowledge. In J. P. Forgas & K. D. Williams (Eds.),Social influence: Direct and indirect processes (pp. 167–183). Philadelphia: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  10. Bransford, J. D., &Johnson, M. K. (1972). Contextual prerequisites for understanding: Some investigations of comprehension and recall.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,11, 717–726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brewer, W. F. (1986). What is autobiographical memory? In D. C. Rubin (Ed.),Autobiographical memory (pp. 25–49). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Brown, R., &Kulik, J. (1977). Flashbulb memories.Cognition,5, 73–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Christianson, S.-Å. (1992). Do flashbulb memories differ from other types of emotional memories? In E. Winograd & U. Neisser (Eds.),Affect and accuracy in recall: Studies of “flashbulb” memories (pp. 191–211). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., &Aiken, L. S. (2003).Applied mul tiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  15. Cohn, M. A., Mehl, M. R., &Pennebaker, J. W. (2004). Linguistic markers of psychological change surrounding September 11, 2001.Psychological Science,15, 687–693.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Conway, M. A. (1990).Autobiographical memory: An introduction. Buckingham, U.K.: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Conway, M. A. (1996). Autobiographical knowledge and autobiographical memories. In D. C. Rubin (Ed.),Remembering our past: Studies in autobiographical memory (pp. 67–93). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Conway, M. A., &Pleydell-Pearce, C. W. (2000). The constructions of autobiographical memories in the self memory system.Psychological Review,107, 261–288.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Costermans, J., Lories, G., &Ansay, C. (1992). Confidence level and feeling of knowing in question answering: The weight of inferential processes.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,18, 142–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dewhurst, S. A., &Conway, M. A. (1994). Pictures, images and recollective experience.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,20, 1088–1098.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Galea, S., Ahern, J., Resnick, H., Kilpatrick, D., Bucuvalas, M., Gold, J., &Vlahov, D. (2002). Psychological sequelae of the September 11 terrorist attacks in New York City.New England Journal of Medicine,346, 982–987.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Garry, M., Manning, C. G., Loftus, E. F., &Sherman, S. J. (1996). Imagination inflation: Imagining a childhood event inflates confidence that it occurred.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,3, 208–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Haddock, G., Rothman, A. J., Reber, R., &Schwarz, N. (1999). Forming judgments of attitude certainty, intensity, and importance: The role of subjective experiences.Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin,25, 771–782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hart, J. T. (1965). Memory and the feeling-of-knowing experience.Journal of Educational Psychology,56, 208–216.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Hasher, L., Goldstein, D., &Toppino, T. (1977). Frequency and the conference of referential validity.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,16, 107–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Herrmann, D. J. (1982). Know thy memory: The use of questionnaires to assess and study memory.Psychological Bulletin,92, 434–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Johnson, M. K., Foley, M. A., Suengas, A. G., &Raye, C. L. (1988). Phenomenal characteristics of memories for perceived and imagined autobiographical events.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,117, 171–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Johnson, M. K., Hashtroudi, S., &Lindsay, D. S. (1993). Source monitoring.Psychological Bulletin,114, 3–28.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Johnson, M. K., &Raye, C. L. (1981). Reality monitoring.Psychological Review,88, 67–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Jost, J. T., Kruglanski, A. W., &Nelson, T. O. (1998). Social metacognition: An expansionist review.Personality & Social Psychology Review,2, 137–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kelley, C. M., &Lindsay, D. S. (1993). Remembering mistaken for knowing: Ease of retrieval as a basis for confidence in answers to general knowledge questions.Journal of Memory & Language,32, 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Koriat, A. (1993). How do we know what we know? The accessibility account of the feeling of knowing.Psychological Review,100, 609–639.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Koriat, A., &Goldsmith, M. (1996). Monitoring and control processes in the strategic regulation of memory accuracy.Psychological Review,103, 490–517.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Koriat, A., Goldsmith, M., &Pansky, A. (2000). Toward a psychology of memory accuracy.Annual Review of Psychology,51, 481–537.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Koriat, A., &Levy-Sadot, R. (1999). Processes underlying metacognitive judgments: Information-based and experience-based monitoring of one’s own knowledge. In S. Chaiken & Y. Trope (Eds.),Dual-process theories in social psychology (pp. 483–502). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  36. Margalit, A. (2002).The ethics of memory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Mather, M., Johnson, M. K., &DeLeonardis, D. M. (1999). Stereotype reliance in source monitoring: Age differences and neuropsychological test correlates.Cognitive Neuropsychology,16, 437–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Mazzoni, G., &Nelson, T. O. (1995). Judgments of learning are affected by the kind of encoding in ways that cannot be attributed to the level of recall.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,21, 1263–1274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. McCloskey, M., Wible, C. G., &Cohen, N. J. (1988). Is there a special flashbulb-memory mechanism?Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,117, 171–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Metcalfe, J. (2000). Metamemory: Theory and data. In E. Tulving & F. I. M. Craik (Eds.),The Oxford handbook of memory (pp. 197–211). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Neisser, U., &Harsch, N. (1992). Phantom flashbulb: False recollections of hearing the news about Challenger. In E. Winograd & U. Neisser (Eds.),Affect and accuracy in recall: Studies of “flashbulb” memories (pp. 9–31). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Nelson, T. O. (1992).Metacognition: Core readings. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
  43. Nelson, T. O., Leonesio, R. J., Shimamura, A. P., Landwehr, R. F., &Narens, L. (1982). Overlearning and the feeling of knowing.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,8, 279–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Reiser, B. J., Black, J. B., &Abelson, R. P. (1985). Knowledge structures in the organization and retrieval of autobiographical memories.Cognitive Psychology,17, 89–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Reiser, B. J., Black, J. B., &Kalamarides, P. (1986). Strategic memory search processes. In D. C. Rubin (Ed.),Autobiographical memory (pp. 100–121). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Ross, M., Buehler, R., &Karr, J. W. (1998). Assessing the accuracy of conflicting autobiographical memories.Memory & Cognition,26, 1233–1244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Ross, M., &MacDonald, T. K. (1997). How can we be sure? Using truth criteria to validate memories. In M. S. Myslobodsky (Ed.),The mythomanias: The nature of deception and self-deception (pp. 181–201). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  48. Rothman, A. J., &Schwarz, N. (1998). Constructing perceptions of vulnerability: Personal relevance and the use of experiential information in health judgments.Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin,24, 1053–1064.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Rubin, D. C. (2005). A basic-systems approach to autobiographical memory.Current Directions in Psychological Science,14, 79–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Rubin, D. C., &Kozin, M. (1984). Vivid memories.Cognition,16, 81–95.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Schmidt, S. R. (2004). Autobiographical memories for the September 11th attacks: Reconstructive errors and emotional impairment of memory.Memory & Cognition,32, 443–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Schwarz, N., Bless, H., Strack, F., Klumpp, G., Rittenauer-Schatka, H., &Simons, A. (1991). Ease of retrieval as information: Another look at the availability heuristic.Journal of Personality & Social Psychology,61, 195–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Schwarz, N., &Vaughn, L. A. (2002). The availability heuristic revisited: Ease of recall and content of recall as distinct sources of information. In T. Gilovich, D. Griffin, & D. Kahneman (Eds.),Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment (pp. 103–119). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  54. Silver, R. C., Holman, E. A., McIntosh, D. N., Poulin M., &Gil-Rivas, V. (2002). Nationwide longitudinal study of psychological responses to September 11.Journal of the American Medical Association,288, 1235–1244.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Skurnik, I., Schwarz, N., &Winkielman, P. (2000). Drawing inferences from feelings: The role of naive beliefs. In H. Bless & J. P. Forgas (Eds.),The message within: The role of subjective experience in social cognition and behavior (pp. 162–175). Philadelphia: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  56. Sobel, M. E. (1982). Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural models. In S. Leinhardt (Ed.),Sociological methodology 1982 (pp. 290–312). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  57. Strack, F., &Förster, J. (1995). Reporting recollective experiences: Direct access to memory systems?Psychological Science,6, 352–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Talarico, J. M., &Rubin, D. C. (2003). Confidence, not consistency, characterizes flashbulb memories.Psychological Science,14, 455–461.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Tversky, A., &Kahneman, D. (1973). Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability.Cognitive Psychology,5, 207–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Wänke, M., Bohner, G., &Jurkowitsch, A. (1997). There are many reasons to drive a BMW: Does imagined ease of argument generation influence attitudes?Journal of Consumer Research,24, 170–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Weaver, C. A. (1993). Do you need a “flash” to form a flashbulb memory?Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,122, 39–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Whittlesea, B. W. A., &Leboe, J. P. (2000). The heuristic basis of remembering and classification: Fluency, generation, and resemblance.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,129, 84–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Williams, J. M. G., Healy, H. G., &Ellis, N. C. (1999). The effect of imageability and predictability of cues in autobiographical memory.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,52A, 555–579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Winkielman, P., Schwarz, N., &Belli, R. F. (1998). The role of ease of retrieval and attribution in memory judgments: Judging your memory as worse despite recalling more events.Psychological Science,9, 124–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Wright, D. B. (1993). Recall of the Hillsborough disaster over time: Systematic biases of “flashbulb” memories.Applied Cognitive Psychology,7, 129–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Psychonomic Society, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of CologneCologneGermany
  2. 2.New School UniversityNew YorkNew York

Personalised recommendations