Memory & Cognition

, Volume 34, Issue 6, pp 1260–1272

Accounting for sequential trial effects in the flanker task: Conflict adaptation or associative priming?

  • Sander Nieuwenhuis
  • John F. Stins
  • Danielle Posthuma
  • Tinca J. C. Polderman
  • Dorret I. Boomsma
  • Eco J. de Geus
Article

Abstract

The conflict-control loop theory proposes that the detection of conflict in information processing triggers an increase in cognitive control, resulting in improved performance on the subsequent trial. This theory seems consistent with the robust finding that conflict susceptibility is reduced following correct trials associated with high conflict: the conflict adaptation effect. However, despite providing favorable conditions for eliciting and detecting conflict-triggered performance adjustments, none of the five experiments reported here provide unequivocal evidence of such adjustments. Instead, the results corroborate and extend earlier findings by demonstrating that the conflict adaptation effect, at least in the flanker task, is only present for a specific subset of trial sequences that is characterized by a response repetition. This pattern of results provides strong evidence that the conflict adaptation effect reflects associative stimulus-response priming instead of conflict-driven adaptations in cognitive control.

References

  1. Bish, J. P., Ferrante, S. M., McDonald-McGinn, D., Zackai, E., &Simon, T. J. (2005). Maladaptive conflict monitoring as evidence for executive dysfunction in children with chromosome 22q11.2 deletion syndrome.Developmental Science,8, 36–43.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Boomsma, D. I. (1998). Twin registers in Europe: An overview.Twin Research,1, 34–51.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Botvinick, M. M., Braver, T. S., Barch, D. M., Carter, C. S., &Cohen, J. D. (2001). Conflict monitoring and cognitive control.Psychological Review,108, 624–652.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Botvinick, M. M., Cohen, J. D., &Carter, C. S. (2004). Conflict monitoring and anterior cingulate cortex: An update.Trends in Cognitive Sciences,8, 539–546.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Botvinick, M. [M.], Nystrom, L. E., Fissell, K., Carter, C. S., &Cohen, J. D. (1999). Conflict monitoring versus selection-for-action in anterior cingulate cortex.Nature,402, 179–181.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Burle, B., Allain, S., Vidal, F., &Hasbroucq, T. (2005). Sequential compatibility effects and cognitive control: Does conflict really matter?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,31, 831–837.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. de Bruijn, E. R. A., Hulstijn, W., Verkes, R. J., Ruigt, G. S. F., &Sabbe, B. G. C. (2004). Drug-induced stimulation and suppression of action monitoring in healthy volunteers.Psychopharmacology,177, 151–160.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Durston, S., Davidson, M. C., Thomas, K. M., Worden, M. S., Tottenham, N., Martinez, A., et al. (2003). Parametric manipulation of conflict and response competition using rapid mixed-trial eventrelated fMRI.NeuroImage,20, 2135–2141.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Egner, T., &Hirsch, J. (2005). The neural correlates and functional integration of cognitive control in a Stroop task.NeuroImage,24, 539–547.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Eriksen, B. A., &Eriksen, C. W. (1974). Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task.Perception & Psychophysics,16, 143–149.Google Scholar
  11. Gratton, G., Coles, M. G. H., &Donchin, E. (1992). Optimizing the use of information: Strategic control of activation of responses.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,121, 480–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gratton, G., Coles, M. G. H., Sirevaag, E. J., Eriksen, C. W., &Donchin, E. (1988). Pre- and poststimulus activation of response channels: A psychophysiological analysis.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,14, 331–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hommel, B. (2004). Event files: Feature binding in and across perception and action.Trends in Cognitive Sciences,8, 494–500.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Hommel, B., Proctor, R. W., &Vu, K.-P. (2004). A feature-integration account of sequential effects in the Simon task.Psychological Research,68, 1–17.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Kerns, J. G., Cohen, J. D., MacDonald, A. W., III,Cho, R. Y., Stenger, V. A., &Carter, C. S. (2004). Anterior cingulate conflict monitoring and adjustments in control.Science,303, 1023–1026.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Kopp, B., Rist, F., &Mattler, U. (1996). N200 in the flanker task as a neurobehavioral tool for investigating executive control.Psychophysiology,33, 282–294.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Leuthold, H. (2004). Action monitoring and control: In search of common principles. In M. Ullsperger & M. Falkenstein (Eds.),Errors, conflicts, and the brain: Current opinions on performance monitoring (pp. 70–76). Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Science.Google Scholar
  18. Mattler, U. (2003). Delayed flanker effects on lateralized readiness potentials.Experimental Brain Research,151, 272–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Mayr, U., Awh, E., &Laurey, P. (2003). Conflict adaptation effects in the absence of executive control.Nature Neuroscience,6, 450–452.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. McNeely, H. E., West, R., Christensen, B. K., &Alain, C. (2003). Neurophysiological evidence for disturbances of conflict processing in patients with schizophrenia.Journal of Abnormal Psychology,112, 679–688.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Müller, H. J., Heller, D., &Ziegler, J. (1995). Visual search for singleton feature targets within and across feature dimensions.Perception & Psychophysics,57, 1–17.Google Scholar
  22. Nieuwenhuis, S., Yeung, N., Van den Wildenberg, W., &Ridderinkhof, K. R. (2003). Electrophysiological correlates of anterior cingulate function in a go/no-go task: Effects of response conflict and trial type frequency.Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience,3, 17–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Notebaert, W., Soetens, E., &Melis, A. (2001). Sequential analysis of a Simon task: Evidence for an attention-shift account.Psychological Research,65, 170–184.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Pashler, H., &Baylis, G. (1991). Procedural learning: 2. Intertrial repetition effects in speeded choice tasks.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,17, 33–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Posthuma, D., Mulder, E. J. C. M., Boomsma, D. I., &de Geus, E. J. C. (2002). Genetic analysis of IQ, processing speed and stimulus-response incongruency effects.Biological Psychology,61, 157–182.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Ridderinkhof, K. R., Ullsperger, M., Crone, E. A., &Nieuwenhuis, S. (2004). The role of the medial frontal cortex in cognitive control.Science,306, 443–447.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Stadler, M. A., &Hogan, M. E. (1996). Varieties of positive and negative priming.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,3, 87–90.Google Scholar
  28. Stins, J. F., Polderman, J. C., Boomsma, D. I., &de Geus, E. J. C. (2005). Response interference and working memory in 12-year-old children.Child Neuropsychology,11, 191–201.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Stürmer, B.,Leuthold, H., Soetens, E., Schröter, H., &Sommer, W. (2002). Control over location-based response activation in the Simon task: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence.Journal of Ex perimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,28, 1345–1363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ullsperger, M., Bylsma, L. M., &Botvinick, M. M. (2005). The conflict adaptation effect: It’s not just priming.Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience,5, 467–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Wascher, E., Reinhard, M., Wauschkuhn, B., &Verleger, R. (1999). Spatial S-R compatibility with centrally presented stimuli: An event-related asymmetry study on dimensional overlap.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,11, 214–229.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Wühr, P., &Ansorge, U. (2005). Exploring trial-by-trial modulations of the Simon effect.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,58A, 705–731.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Psychonomic Society, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sander Nieuwenhuis
    • 1
  • John F. Stins
    • 1
    • 3
    • 4
  • Danielle Posthuma
    • 1
  • Tinca J. C. Polderman
    • 2
  • Dorret I. Boomsma
    • 1
  • Eco J. de Geus
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Cognitive PsychologyVrije Universiteit AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Erasmus MCRotterdamThe Netherlands
  3. 3.Department of Cognitive Psychology at the Vrije UniversiteitAmsterdamThe Netherlands
  4. 4.Institute for Fundamental and Clinial Human Movement Sciences at the Vrije UniversiteitAmsterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations