Accounting for sequential trial effects in the flanker task: Conflict adaptation or associative priming?
The conflict-control loop theory proposes that the detection of conflict in information processing triggers an increase in cognitive control, resulting in improved performance on the subsequent trial. This theory seems consistent with the robust finding that conflict susceptibility is reduced following correct trials associated with high conflict: the conflict adaptation effect. However, despite providing favorable conditions for eliciting and detecting conflict-triggered performance adjustments, none of the five experiments reported here provide unequivocal evidence of such adjustments. Instead, the results corroborate and extend earlier findings by demonstrating that the conflict adaptation effect, at least in the flanker task, is only present for a specific subset of trial sequences that is characterized by a response repetition. This pattern of results provides strong evidence that the conflict adaptation effect reflects associative stimulus-response priming instead of conflict-driven adaptations in cognitive control.
- Eriksen, B. A., &Eriksen, C. W. (1974). Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task.Perception & Psychophysics,16, 143–149.Google Scholar
- Leuthold, H. (2004). Action monitoring and control: In search of common principles. In M. Ullsperger & M. Falkenstein (Eds.),Errors, conflicts, and the brain: Current opinions on performance monitoring (pp. 70–76). Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Science.Google Scholar
- Müller, H. J., Heller, D., &Ziegler, J. (1995). Visual search for singleton feature targets within and across feature dimensions.Perception & Psychophysics,57, 1–17.Google Scholar
- Stadler, M. A., &Hogan, M. E. (1996). Varieties of positive and negative priming.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,3, 87–90.Google Scholar
- Wühr, P., &Ansorge, U. (2005). Exploring trial-by-trial modulations of the Simon effect.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,58A, 705–731.Google Scholar